In a six-minute clip from the Aubrey Marcus podcast, the host asks the question that sits underneath a lot of modern spiritual searching: what is Jesus Christ doing right now? The answer does not come from a pulpit or a scholar. It comes through Lee Harris, who relays messages from the non-physical guides he channels, and those guides say Yeshua has never left this planet, is present more powerfully than ever, and can be reached by any person willing to ask to feel his love. Along the way the guides describe his presence as an angelic wingspan stretched over the earth, argue that religion built on control and condemnation has lost touch with his name, and call the current exposure of church abuses an important moment for humanity to question everything. What follows is a close reading of those claims: what they say, how they are built, and what a reader can do with them.
The clip opens mid-conversation. Aubrey Marcus names his subject plainly, "the avatar uh Jesus Christ," and the reply comes without preamble: a yes, and a claim that he has "never left this planet." Before the answer is fully delivered, the audio catches a sharp breath, a small sigh and gasp, the sound of a question landing on someone who has been waiting to hear it. That moment is worth noticing. The entire clip turns on a single assertion, that the figure many people were taught about in a childhood setting is still active in the present tense, and that his activity is intensifying rather than fading.
The guides go further than presence. They say that many are "becoming activated" by him, and they draw a distinction between the figure and the people who invoke him. There are those, the guides say, who "still use his name in vain and use his name as justification for hatred and war." According to the channeled account, Yeshua does not take offense. He forgives them, and the guides suggest these people are "somewhat unaware of the shadow in their heart" that wants to justify weaponizing his name. The word shadow recurs across the clip, and it is the hinge on which the rest of the argument turns.
The guides say he is angelic in form, and then they offer a picture. Their own caveat matters: they say they do not mean the image "to sound too basic," but they still give it.
"Imagine his wide wingspan wrapped all across the planet. He is essentially keeping everyone warm, covering everyone with his angelic light." (Lee Harris, channeling the guides, in the Aubrey Marcus podcast episode released February 25, 2026)
The image does two things at once. It is comforting: a wing that wraps the whole globe is a shelter, a warmth that reaches people regardless of where they stand. But the guides immediately add a qualification that keeps the picture from becoming a fantasy of safety. "It doesn't mean that things that are dark or destructive cannot play out underneath his wingspan," the channeled voice says. "Of course, they can." In other words, the presence is universal, but it is not a force field. Harm still happens. What changes, according to the guides, is whether a person is in relationship to the light above it.
That is why the guides insist on a specific condition: "People have to rise to meet him to feel his energy and they have to make a conscious connection to him to feel his energy." Presence alone is not enough. The wingspan covers everyone, but feeling it requires turning toward it. The guides tie this directly to prayer, calling it "why prayer is so effective" and "why the form of prayer is so effective." Readers from a contemplative background will recognize the logic. Many traditions have long held that grace is ambient and that attention is the doorway.
The most practical instruction in the clip is also the shortest. "If you choose to pray to Yeshua and connect with Yeshua, the simplest thing you can do is to ask to feel his love. Feel his love." The guides then model the words themselves, a plain request: "Yeshua, may I connect to your love?" They are firm about the answer: "And he will always say yes. He will always say yes. He is waiting for you to feel his love."
Notice what the practice does not require. There is no liturgy, no institution, no credential, no decades of study. There is a request made from the heart, and a claim that the request is always received. For a reader who has felt shut out of formal religion, that simplicity is the point. It moves the center of the practice from a building or a rulebook to a single honest sentence.
The guides also diagnose why that sentence is so hard to say for many people. "So many of you have not felt true love," the channeled voice says, and then explains the mechanism. When someone has never felt what it is to be truly loved and to love, "they have not opened up the flow of their heart yet." The guides are careful to add that this is "not anyone's fault." Their observation is that people crave true love but "are usually looking in the wrong places or thinking that it is outside them." The remedy they propose is inward: "When you connect to the love of Yeshua, you will feel it in your heart and your body." The body is named explicitly. Feeling, not belief, is treated as the proof.
This is the part of the clip that will draw the sharpest reactions, and it is worth reading slowly. The guides do not dismiss spiritual experience; they treat it as real. Their concern is what happens afterward. A person has a direct experience, says "I felt the love of Jesus," and then walks into a church where, in the guides' words, "they are told by the shadowy pastor the shadowy version of events and they believe that shadowy version of events."
The mechanism they describe is one of overcorrection. Because the person has felt something holy, the guides argue, they begin "blindly following all the rules without really questioning." The question they say is missing is a body-based one: "Does this rule feel loving in my body?" Without it, the seeker moves out of the heart and into the mind, trying to get back to the feeling by obeying. The clip lists the ordinary promises that fill that gap, going to school at the right time, getting married, earning enough to buy the car or the holiday that will finally make you happy, and answers each with a flat rejection. "No, no, no, no, no." The guides' conclusion is that "love and lies often intermingle," and that people who have been genuinely activated by Yeshua are targeted by those who would "bring them in under their umbrella and their guidance."
The guides then turn to imagery. "Isn't it interesting," the channeled voice asks, "that in your house of worship you are so often looking at a man nailed to a cross bleeding?" The question continues: in a house of love, why are worshippers asked to look at "the image of what humans did to another being"? The answer offered is blunt: "It is not an act of love. It is an act of war on the body and soul of another." Whatever a reader makes of that claim, it is a clear example of how the guides want the emotional weather of worship changed: from contemplating suffering to receiving love.
Even so, the guides do not condemn every institution. They say that religious institutions "are needing what we would call an upgrade," and they praise "many wonderful ministers, pastors, leaders of religious community" who are doing that work, along with the members of their communities. The line they draw is about use. "Where religion is used to control they are not working in the name of Yeshua. For he is love and omnipresence." The test, in other words, is not doctrine but purpose. A faith that tries to hate, annihilate, or police a group is, by the guides' account, operating outside the name it claims.
The clip ends on its most pointed claim: the exposure of church abuses is a sign of the times. The guides say that "for so many years it was taboo to question the leaders." Now, they argue, "the fact that the leaders are falling and being exposed for behavior that was not aligned with what they were espousing" is "a very important moment for humanity to question everything." The argument is less about any single scandal than about permission. When the authority of leaders stops being untouchable, the wider community is free to ask what else it has accepted without question.
That reasoning connects the whole clip. The guides' view of Yeshua is of a presence that is never distorted by those who misuse his name, "too far above all of that." Human institutions, by contrast, can be bent. The implication is that a reader who wants the real figure, rather than the one described by a "shadowy" pastor, must learn to tell the difference between the two, and the feeling in the body is offered as the instrument for telling it.
It is worth being honest about what this clip is and is not. It is a short excerpt of channeled guidance, delivered through an individual channel, and its central claims (that Yeshua is present, that he will always say yes to a request to feel his love, that the body can confirm the truth of a teaching) are spiritual assertions rather than things a camera or a record can verify. Readers from very different traditions will weigh them differently, and the clip itself invites that questioning. Its final message, after all, is to "question everything."
The most usable idea in the clip may be the smallest one: the question "Does this rule feel loving in my body?" It can be applied to any teaching, channeled or not. It asks the reader to notice contraction or openness, to check whether a practice leads toward love or toward fear of falling short. Whatever the metaphysics, that is a portable tool, and it is one the guides explicitly recommend.
If this clip raised questions, the full Aubrey Marcus podcast episode with Lee Harris is the place to get the surrounding context: the full episode on YouTube. Listen for what is said before and after the exchange about Jesus, since six minutes compresses a long conversation. Then try the practice the guides describe in a quiet moment, if it speaks to you: a plain request to feel love, followed by attention to the body rather than the mind. And keep the guides' own final instruction in view. Ask what feels true, what feels loving, and what still needs questioning.
