BrightStar

Alle Events durchsuchen

Bewusste Zusammenkünfte entdecken

events

Yoga
Meditation
Breathwork
Qigong
Tai Chi
Sacred Music
World Music
Medicine Music
Sound Healing
Ecstatic Dance
Beliebte Reiseziele
BaliSedonaLos AngelesCosta RicaNew YorkSan FranciscoAustinMiamiJoshua TreeTulum
Alle Kategorien anzeigenAlle Reiseziele anzeigen

Alle Funktionen entdecken

Leistungsstarke Tools für Ihre Veranstaltungen

Plattform-Funktionen

Intelligente dynamische Preisgestaltung
Ticket-Kategorien
Sitzplatzreservierung
Warenkorbabbruch-Wiederherstellung
Besucher-Wiedergewinnung
Spenden & Staffelpreise
Affiliate-System
Ticket-Scanner
Rabattcodes
Individuelle Fragen
Ticket-Teilen
Upsells & Extras
Analysen & Berichte
E-Mail-Sequenzen
Warteliste / Benachrichtigen / Erinnern
Menschen & Orte
Artists & TeachersEvent OrganizersVenues & StudiosKnowledge BaseGlossaryInspiration
Alle Funktionen anzeigenÜber uns
PreiseBlog
Language
Saved events
Alle Veranstaltungen durchsuchen

events

YogaMeditationBreathworkQigongTai ChiSacred MusicWorld MusicMedicine Music

Beliebte Reiseziele

BaliSedonaLos AngelesCosta RicaNew YorkSan Francisco

Menschen & Orte

Artists & TeachersEvent OrganizersVenues & StudiosKnowledge BaseGlossaryInspiration

Plattform-Funktionen

Intelligente dynamische PreisgestaltungTicket-KategorienSitzplatzreservierungWarenkorbabbruch-WiederherstellungBesucher-WiedergewinnungSpenden & StaffelpreiseAffiliate-SystemTicket-ScannerRabattcodesIndividuelle FragenTicket-TeilenUpsells & ExtrasAnalysen & BerichteE-Mail-SequenzenWarteliste / Benachrichtigen / Erinnern
Alle Funktionen anzeigenÜber uns
PreiseBlog
AnmeldenSuchendeKreative
  • Alle Events durchsuchen
  • Für Suchende
  • Yoga
  • Meditation
  • Breathwork
  • Qigong
  • Tai Chi
  • Heilige Musik
  • Weltmusik
  • Medicine Music
  • Klangheilung
  • Ecstatic Dance
  • Retreats
  • Workshops
  • Alle Kategorien →
  • Bali
  • Sedona
  • Los Angeles
  • Costa Rica
  • Tulum
  • Byron Bay
  • San Francisco
  • Austin
  • New York
  • San Diego
  • Denver
  • Seattle
  • Portland
  • Miami
  • Alle Städte →
  • Join the Movement
  • Why we list
  • Sell Globally
  • Für Kreative
  • Für Teams
  • Für Autoren
  • Für Lehrer
  • Für Kirtan-Künstler
  • Für Studios
  • Für Festivals
  • Für Retreat-Zentren
  • Für gemeinnützige Organisationen
  • Markenbotschafter
  • Kostenloses Ticketing
  • Elevate
  • Amplify
  • 500.000+ Käufernetzwerk
  • Warenkorbabbruch-Wiederherstellung
  • Intelligente dynamische Preisgestaltung
  • Ticket-Kategorien
  • Wiederkehrende Veranstaltungen
  • Sitzplatzreservierung
  • Affiliate-System
  • Warteliste / Benachrichtigen
  • Ticket-Scanner
  • Einbettungs-Widget
  • Event-Syndication
  • Nachrichten
  • Integrationen
  • Berichte
  • Alle Funktionen →
  • Über uns
  • Das Ökosystem
  • Blog
  • Glossar
  • Inspiration
  • Hilfe-Center
  • Kontakt
  • API-Dokumentation
  • Marken-Assets
  • Karriere
  • Presse
  • Nutzungsbedingungen
  • Datenschutzrichtlinie

Events

  • Alle Events durchsuchen
  • Für Suchende
  • Yoga
  • Meditation
  • Breathwork
  • Qigong
  • Tai Chi
  • Heilige Musik
  • Weltmusik
  • Medicine Music
  • Klangheilung
  • Ecstatic Dance
  • Retreats
  • Workshops
  • Alle Kategorien →

Reiseziele

  • Bali
  • Sedona
  • Los Angeles
  • Costa Rica
  • Tulum
  • Byron Bay
  • San Francisco
  • Austin
  • New York
  • San Diego
  • Denver
  • Seattle
  • Portland
  • Miami
  • Alle Städte →

Für Kreative

  • Join the Movement
  • Why we list
  • Sell Globally
  • Für Kreative
  • Für Teams
  • Für Autoren
  • Für Lehrer
  • Für Kirtan-Künstler
  • Für Studios
  • Für Festivals
  • Für Retreat-Zentren
  • Für gemeinnützige Organisationen
  • Markenbotschafter
  • Kostenloses Ticketing
  • Elevate
  • Amplify

Funktionen

  • 500.000+ Käufernetzwerk
  • Warenkorbabbruch-Wiederherstellung
  • Intelligente dynamische Preisgestaltung
  • Ticket-Kategorien
  • Wiederkehrende Veranstaltungen
  • Sitzplatzreservierung
  • Affiliate-System
  • Warteliste / Benachrichtigen
  • Ticket-Scanner
  • Einbettungs-Widget
  • Event-Syndication
  • Nachrichten
  • Integrationen
  • Berichte
  • Alle Funktionen →

Unternehmen

  • Über uns
  • Das Ökosystem
  • Blog
  • Glossar
  • Inspiration
  • Hilfe-Center
  • Kontakt
  • API-Dokumentation
  • Marken-Assets
  • Karriere
  • Presse
  • Nutzungsbedingungen
  • Datenschutzrichtlinie
BrightStar
Hol dir die App
Laden imApp StoreJetzt beiGoogle Play
© 2026 BrightStar. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
Inspiration

True Responsibility: From Society to Spirit

AB
Amaravati Buddhist Monastery
Oct 20, 2026
6 Min. Lesezeit

Von Amaravati Buddhist Monastery

Ansehen · 7

On the full moon of September, gathered in the hall at Amaravati Buddhist Monastery, Ajahn Dhammanando offered a teaching that cuts to the heart of a question many of us hold but rarely voice: What does it actually mean to take responsibility? His answer—drawn from Buddhist practice, recent history, and a striking story from the monastery's own past—reveals that responsibility is far more complicated, and more liberating, than the world's accounting usually allows.

Lesen · 5 Abschnitte

Two Angles on One Word

Early in his talk, Ajahn Dhammanando recounts an encounter from the monastery's formative years. A nun had chosen monastic life, stepping away from conventional employment, income, and the role society expected her to play. Someone confronted her: "Are you sure that what you're doing is really the responsible thing?"

Her reply was immediate and unsettling: "I think I couldn't do anything more responsible than what I'm doing."

Here, in miniature, lie two irreconcilable definitions of responsibility. The questioner was thinking in societal terms: earning a living, paying taxes, taking your assigned place in the machinery of ordinary life, being a model citizen. The nun was thinking in spiritual terms: taking complete responsibility for her actions, her speech, and the contents of her own mind—nothing less than the whole field of her consciousness.

Both were right. Both were also, from the other's vantage point, absurd.

What Success and Failure Reveal

Ajahn Dhammanando then traces how worldly responsibility operates according to an unforgiving logic: people will take responsibility for success. They will deny it for failure.

He offers a vivid example. A man named Nick Scott, once close to the monasteries and a project manager at Chithurst, was warden of a bird reserve in Northumberland when a mining company sought permission to extract stones from a local beach. Scott and others mounted a campaign. At first, almost no one cared. The council and the company seemed aligned; the odds were impossible. But the campaigners persisted. Gradually, awareness grew. The case went to court. They won. The mining was stopped. The beach was preserved.

"By the end of it," Ajahn Dhammanando notes, "everyone wanted to be on board because it was a success. Everyone wanted to be partly responsible for this campaign. They all took responsibility because it was a success."

The flip side is darker. He invokes Grenfell Tower, the West London residential block that caught fire on June 14, 2017—nine years before this talk. The building had been retrofitted with cladding that was supposed to be fireproof but wasn't. When fire broke out, it raced up the exterior. Seventy-two people died inside.

In the aftermath, no one claimed responsibility. The builders didn't. The officials who approved the materials didn't. The local authority charged with checking building safety didn't. The people at the top of the hierarchy who must have known the cladding was defective but allowed prosecutions to continue—they didn't either. "Even 9 years later," Ajahn Dhammanando says, "no one has been charged with anything."

He mentions another catastrophe: the Post Office Horizon scandal. Faulty accounting software from Japan caused the Post Office to prosecute honest postmasters and mistresses for theft they hadn't committed, draining their savings and destroying their reputations. The people who designed and maintained the system, and the executives who must have eventually recognized its failures yet continued the prosecutions anyway, scattered responsibility like seeds in the wind. Again, no one at the top faced criminal charges.

The pattern is unmistakable. In worldly life, responsibility flows toward success and evaporates before failure—especially when failure carries shame or legal consequence. We are creatures who will gladly step forward to claim the victory but will contort ourselves into any shape to avoid the wreckage.

The Worldly Winds

Ajahn Dhammanando frames this behavior through a classical Buddhist lens: the worldly winds. In Buddhist teaching, eight worldly winds—gain and loss, fame and disrepute, praise and blame, pleasure and pain—blow constantly through human life. They are the weather we live in. We are moved by them almost involuntarily. Success and failure are among the most powerful of these winds. They dictate not only our emotions but our ethics, our willingness to be accountable, even our sense of truth.

The question becomes: To what extent are we simply being swept by these winds? And is there a way to develop enough stability, enough clarity, to stand in them without being knocked over?

A Different Kind of Responsibility

The spiritual responsibility the nun spoke of is built on radically different ground. It begins with an acknowledgment that has little to do with society's scorecards. In the Buddhist framework, every action we take—physical, verbal, and mental—carries consequence. We are responsible not only for what we do but for the intention behind it. We are responsible, moreover, for how we perceive, how we react, what we allow to live in our consciousness.

This is an exhausting responsibility compared to the worldly kind. You cannot evade it by blaming systems, bad luck, other people, or the times we live in. You cannot split it among committees or bury it in bureaucracy. It travels with you, moment to moment, thought to thought.

At the same time, it is liberating. Unlike societal responsibility—which depends on others' approval, on circumstances, on the fickle winds of success and failure—spiritual responsibility is entirely your own. No external authority can revoke it or reassign it. No failure can strip you of it. In fact, the deeper you engage with it, the more you see that you have never been anything but responsible for your own mind, your own practice, your own becoming.

Where to go from here

Ajahn Dhammanando's teaching suggests that the either-or between worldly and spiritual responsibility is itself a false choice. We live in both worlds. We do owe something to society—honesty, integrity, a refusal to pass blame onto the innocent. At the same time, no amount of societal success, no matter how well we play our assigned role, will free us from the responsibility we carry for our inner life.

The question, then, is not whether to choose one form of responsibility over the other, but whether we can cultivate enough awareness to honor both—to do what we do in the world with clarity and restraint, while simultaneously tending to the field of our own consciousness. The nun who walked away from conventional life and the citizen who stays embedded in it may actually be engaged in the same work: learning what it means to truly respond, rather than merely react, to the forces that move us.

Comments

Loading the conversation…

Transcript

[0:09] Namo Tassa Bhagavato Arahato Samma

[0:14] Sambuddhassa

[0:16] Namo Tassa Bhagavato

[0:20] Arahato Samma Sambuddhassa

[0:24] Namo Tassa Bhagavato

[0:28] Arahato Samma

[0:31] Sambuddhassa

[0:33] Buddha

[0:35] Dhamma

[0:36] Sangha

[0:37] Namassami

[0:45] So tonight is the bigger possater the

[0:48] full moon of September. So we're all

[0:51] gathered here.

[0:52] The monks and nuns have done their

[0:53] recitations today.

[0:56] As per usual.

[1:01] It's always interesting to know exactly

[1:02] where or try to mark where we are in

[1:04] time.

[1:06] And

[1:07] >> [clears throat]

[1:07] >> I think this point is

[1:09] almost exactly 2/3 of the way through

[1:12] the Vasa.

[1:13] So it seemed only a few days ago that

[1:15] Ajahn Amaro was telling us we were

[1:17] halfway through it. Now we're 2/3 of the

[1:19] way through the Vasa.

[1:21] Um

[1:23] And most many monks and nuns are on solo

[1:25] retreat, which is why there aren't so

[1:27] many in the hall tonight.

[1:30] But this period of solo retreat

[1:32] will be coming to an end on the 19th of

[1:35] October.

[1:36] And then we go into another period,

[1:38] which is of group practice up until the

[1:41] 26th of October, and that's the end of

[1:43] the Vasa.

[1:44] So this may not be very significant for

[1:47] lay visitors, but for the Sangha it is

[1:48] quite significant.

[1:52] And the other thing I thought struck me

[1:54] was about the the date today, today's

[1:58] date

[1:59] is in fact what we call in English a

[2:01] palindrome.

[2:03] Now, a palindrome is a sequence of words

[2:06] or letters or numbers

[2:08] that read the same front to back and

[2:11] back to front.

[2:13] So, today's date is 26 9 26.

[2:18] 26 9 26.

[2:21] So, it's nothing particularly

[2:22] significant, but I thought I'd mention

[2:23] it.

[2:28] So, anyway, today's talk I'm I wanted to

[2:30] talk about responsibility.

[2:34] Uh this is a sort of

[2:36] interesting word, how we respond,

[2:38] whether we take responsibility

[2:40] or not for certain things and how we do

[2:43] that.

[2:44] So, in English we can talk about taking

[2:46] responsibility,

[2:48] accepting responsibility,

[2:50] assuming responsibility,

[2:53] denying responsibility, and shouldering

[2:56] responsibility.

[2:58] These are all slightly different terms

[3:00] as to how we approach this concept of

[3:03] responsibility.

[3:05] And one of the incidents in the early

[3:08] life of this Sangha has always stayed

[3:10] with me,

[3:12] which is uh something I heard,

[3:14] which is that um in the early days uh of

[3:18] the Sangha,

[3:19] uh as you may know, there were a few

[3:21] nuns that become uh nuns and one of

[3:24] them, let's call her Nun B,

[3:27] um was was talking with somebody, let's

[3:29] call that person person A.

[3:32] And person A said to this nun,

[3:35] "Are you sure that what you're doing

[3:38] is really the responsible thing? Are you

[3:40] being responsible?"

[3:43] To which the nun replied,

[3:45] "I think I couldn't do anything more

[3:47] responsible than what I'm doing."

[3:50] So, this of course was a a period some

[3:52] time ago

[3:54] before people uh were very accustomed to

[3:57] monks and nuns

[3:59] or less accustomed to monks and nuns.

[4:01] People sort of

[4:03] leaving uh the the usual paths of life

[4:06] and going into a monastery.

[4:08] So, anyway, what were these two angles

[4:11] on responsibility?

[4:13] So, the first one, person A,

[4:16] was I'm sure thinking of taking your

[4:18] place in society,

[4:21] earning your living,

[4:23] you know, standing up for your own sort

[4:25] of

[4:27] supporting your own life, paying your

[4:29] taxes,

[4:31] um

[4:32] being a model for other people, and so

[4:34] on. Being a full playing a full part in

[4:36] society.

[4:38] Whereas the nun, nun B,

[4:41] was I'm sure thinking of other things.

[4:43] She was thinking of,

[4:44] you know,

[4:46] from the practice angle of taking full

[4:48] responsibility for her actions and her

[4:50] speech,

[4:52] and even possibly for the contents of

[4:54] her own mind.

[4:56] So, for her, this was the most

[4:57] responsible thing she could do.

[5:07] So, I thought I'd try to look at this

[5:09] concept of being responsible or what

[5:11] responsibility entails from these

[5:13] different angles.

[5:16] And let's start with the

[5:18] So, the the

[5:20] person A's version is the societal angle

[5:23] on responsibility. Let's say that the

[5:25] nun's version is individual or spiritual

[5:29] responsibility.

[5:31] So, let's start with the world's the

[5:32] world's view on responsibility.

[5:35] And when people are willing to take

[5:38] responsibility or not.

[5:43] >> [clears throat and cough]

[5:44] >> So, it comes back, it seems to me, to

[5:46] success and failure.

[5:52] Everyone likes success.

[5:54] Nobody wants to be associated

[5:57] with failure.

[6:00] So,

[6:02] some [clears throat] of you may have

[6:02] heard this name. There's a

[6:04] a gentleman by the name of Nick Scott

[6:07] who

[6:08] at some point was very close to the

[6:10] monasteries. He was a kind of project

[6:12] manager at Chithurst and he did many

[6:14] things for the monasteries.

[6:16] He's a kind of mover and shaker. Could

[6:19] He's very good at

[6:21] um initiating things, perhaps not so

[6:23] good at finishing them off, but

[6:25] he certainly gets things going and

[6:27] inspires people.

[6:29] So, anyway, in his younger self, he was

[6:31] I think he was the warden of a bird

[6:33] reserve somewhere in Northumberland.

[6:36] And there was an issue around a beach.

[6:38] There was a mining company that wanted

[6:40] to mine the beach for certain

[6:43] stones or whatever, certain

[6:47] you know, items on the beach.

[6:50] Nick was very uh much opposed to this

[6:51] and so were some other people. So, they

[6:53] started a campaign to stop this mining

[6:55] company mine the beach. And at first,

[6:59] very few people were interested.

[7:01] Clearly, the council and the company

[7:03] going to mine the beach were in

[7:05] agreement. There didn't seem to be, you

[7:07] know, much that they could do, but they

[7:08] kept on with the campaign.

[7:10] And gradually, more and more people

[7:12] became aware of this.

[7:14] And finally, it was even taken to court

[7:17] and they won. They managed to stop this

[7:19] mining happening on this very beautiful

[7:21] beach in Northumberland.

[7:23] And it was a triumph, you know,

[7:25] eventually, it was a great success.

[7:27] And they put on lots of displays like

[7:29] Nick turning up as a Viking holding a

[7:31] sword and with a helmet

[7:33] off with his head and things like that.

[7:36] Anyway, he says by the end of it,

[7:38] everyone wanted to be on board because

[7:40] it was it was a success. Everyone wanted

[7:43] to

[7:44] be partly responsible for this

[7:46] uh this campaign.

[7:48] They all took responsibility because it

[7:50] was a success.

[7:52] Now, we look at other aspects of life in

[7:54] Britain, and

[7:56] some of them can be a little bit

[7:58] depressing or concerning.

[8:00] So, in particular, I'm thinking of a an

[8:02] event that happened 9 years ago.

[8:05] And this was a tower block in central

[8:07] West London called Grenfell Tower.

[8:10] And this was a specially constructed

[8:12] building with lots of kind of concrete

[8:14] compartments in it. So, fire was not

[8:16] supposed to spread.

[8:18] Everyone lived in their own separate

[8:20] little concrete compartment, and fire

[8:23] couldn't get to them even if it was

[8:24] affecting someone else.

[8:27] And so, many had had heard the advice,

[8:29] "Stay in your flat. Stay in your

[8:31] compartment. Don't move if there's a

[8:32] fire, you'll be safe."

[8:35] But then, added to the tower

[8:38] was thermal insulation or cladding,

[8:42] which, of course, should have been

[8:43] fireproof,

[8:45] but in fact wasn't.

[8:46] So, when a fire did start,

[8:49] this cladding took up the fire, and the

[8:51] fire went right through the building, a

[8:53] huge conflagration, which went on for

[8:55] about a day or two.

[8:57] Inside that building, 72 people died.

[9:03] Now, after an incident like that, nobody

[9:05] wants to be responsible.

[9:07] The people who built the building, who

[9:09] gave the advice, the people who put up

[9:12] the cladding and claimed it was

[9:15] nonflammable,

[9:16] the local authority that was supposed to

[9:18] check the safety of the building, nobody

[9:21] nobody's going to take responsibility.

[9:23] They're all going to slough it off onto

[9:25] someone else.

[9:29] And that's what's happened, and even 9

[9:32] years later, no one has been charged

[9:33] with anything.

[9:36] And there was another sort of scandal

[9:38] which was called the

[9:40] Post Office Horizon scandal. Some of you

[9:42] may remember.

[9:43] The Post Office adopted a kind of

[9:45] software from Japan called Horizons.

[9:49] Which was to do with the accounting side

[9:51] of local post offices.

[9:53] And postmasters and mistresses

[9:57] doing their very best, they're very

[9:58] honest people on the whole,

[10:00] were told that they'd stolen thousands

[10:02] and thousands of pounds because this

[10:04] software wasn't working properly.

[10:06] They were taken to court.

[10:08] Many had to pay back huge amounts of

[10:09] money which they actually hadn't taken.

[10:13] And probably the people at the top of

[10:14] the Post Office knew by some point they

[10:16] must have known

[10:18] that these Horizon this Horizon software

[10:21] was not working, but they still

[10:22] continued

[10:24] with these

[10:25] prosecutions.

[10:27] So once again, nobody wanted

[10:28] responsibility for this

[10:31] disaster.

[10:33] >> [snorts]

[10:34] >> Everyone trying to

[10:35] push it off onto someone else.

[10:38] So we come back to what is it called?

[10:40] The worldly winds, success, failure,

[10:44] praise and blame.

[10:46] We want success and we want praise. We

[10:49] don't want failure and we don't want

[10:50] blame. This is the natural human

[10:52] reaction.

[11:00] But there were sometimes people who step

[11:01] into the breach and are prepared to take

[11:03] the blame, unusually.

[11:06] So one such person in one incident is

[11:09] our Abbot, Ajahn Munindo. So this was

[11:11] when he was

[11:12] much younger. He was

[11:14] a young man. His name was Jeremy.

[11:17] And he was a buck cow or he was an

[11:19] anagarika in Wat Pah Nanachat in

[11:21] Thailand. A new anagarika there.

[11:25] And

[11:27] >> [clears throat]

[11:28] >> in the schedule of the day, the monks

[11:30] very much looked forward to a cup of tea

[11:32] at some point in the afternoon.

[11:34] And the anagarika's job was to make the

[11:36] tea.

[11:37] So there was another anagarika from

[11:39] France who was making the tea.

[11:42] But he'd been given tea that was very

[11:43] unusual, something like twig tea or

[11:45] something rather complicated. He didn't

[11:47] know how to how to make the tea

[11:50] properly.

[11:51] So he did his very best, but he made a

[11:52] terrible mess. This tea was going to be

[11:54] absolutely disgusting.

[11:57] So Ajahn Amaro, Jeremy, turns up and the

[12:00] the anagarika is saying, "I just don't

[12:02] know what I'm going to do. It's it's

[12:03] absolutely horrible."

[12:05] So Jeremy said, uh

[12:09] "Don't worry, I'll make the tea and you

[12:10] can go and have a rest."

[12:14] So the other anagarika says, "Okay,

[12:16] thanks." You know, he goes and have a

[12:17] rest. So there we are, Ajahn Amaro

[12:19] making the tea for all these monks.

[12:22] And then the universe decided to support

[12:25] him. So he's prepared to take the blame.

[12:29] Then the universe decided to support

[12:31] him. And up rolls a van

[12:34] and out comes somebody with

[12:36] crates of Coca-Cola.

[12:39] This was most unusual.

[12:41] Never happened, but on that day it did

[12:42] happen.

[12:45] So that courage to step in and take the

[12:47] blame

[12:48] I mean, the monks had a wonderful tea.

[12:50] They were praising him no end.

[12:53] They were delighted.

[12:59] So we expect you know, people to take

[13:01] responsibility. So one example of this

[13:03] would be parents and children. We do

[13:05] expect or society expects that parents

[13:08] take responsibility

[13:10] for their children. They're bringing

[13:11] them up.

[13:13] They're setting them an example. They're

[13:15] giving them advice and so on and so

[13:16] forth.

[13:18] But clearly there are some parents who

[13:19] can't do this.

[13:21] They try maybe or in a sort of

[13:23] half-hearted way they try.

[13:25] And there are children who are so

[13:27] willful or so

[13:29] disobedient or so wild that they can't

[13:31] be controlled.

[13:33] So, there was one such uh

[13:36] child, if you like, or young man. His

[13:37] name was Axel, I think Riddick Cabana.

[13:40] Anyway, he

[13:41] he had done some pretty unpleasant

[13:43] things already.

[13:44] And then a year or two ago, he decided

[13:46] he decided to find out what it was like

[13:48] to have murdered someone.

[13:51] So, he went to um

[13:54] he was in South Wales, up in the north,

[13:56] and he went to a dance class of little

[13:58] girls.

[13:59] He went into the dance class with a

[14:01] knife, and he stabbed three little girls

[14:02] to death.

[14:05] So, obviously, he was under arrest.

[14:08] Many other people were injured in the

[14:09] course of that.

[14:11] And then,

[14:12] you know, when the court case came, the

[14:15] father admitted that he was frightened

[14:17] of his own son. He couldn't control his

[14:20] own son.

[14:22] But the court held him to, you know, you

[14:25] should you were responsible. You should

[14:26] have done something about this young

[14:28] man. Maybe this incident wouldn't have

[14:30] happened.

[14:35] Now, another example of of people trying

[14:38] not to accept responsibility would be

[14:39] when we become

[14:41] intoxicated. So,

[14:44] uh last Sunday, I was giving a talk on

[14:47] uh intoxication without alcohol.

[14:51] And um

[14:54] part of that was talking about the

[14:55] effect of alcohol

[14:57] on people. So,

[15:00] people drink, and then they feel that

[15:02] they can do things they wouldn't

[15:03] normally do.

[15:04] So, we have had some very famous

[15:06] sportsmen who

[15:09] in terms of, you know, having got drunk,

[15:11] they will go and wreck places or destroy

[15:14] rooms or bars and things like that.

[15:15] They're quite famous, so they get into

[15:17] the newspaper, and somehow they usually

[15:18] get away with it.

[15:20] And also, sons of the wealthy,

[15:23] uh

[15:24] there was a club in Oxford University

[15:26] called the Bullingdon Club, and two

[15:29] prime ministers of this country were

[15:31] both, as young men, members of that

[15:33] club. And the way they would behave in

[15:35] that club was to go and get drunk. They

[15:37] would then go to a restaurant for a

[15:39] meal, and then, having had the meal,

[15:40] they would wreck the restaurant.

[15:43] So, people like this say, "Well, it

[15:44] wasn't me, it was the drink. I didn't do

[15:47] that, or I wouldn't say that, it was the

[15:49] drink."

[15:53] So, then the question arises, well, who

[15:54] took the drink in the first place? But

[15:59] And sort of other reasons that people

[16:00] use for their antisocial behavior, um

[16:05] "My parents made me like this, I can't

[16:07] help it, this is what they made me." Or

[16:10] they say things like, um "I was abused,

[16:13] or I was bullied in a certain situation,

[16:15] and it made me like this."

[16:17] Or perhaps they say, "I was in a boys'

[16:19] home or a girls' home."

[16:20] "And this was the only way I could

[16:22] survive was to be like this."

[16:29] So, again, people not taking

[16:31] responsibility for their own actions.

[16:33] And

[16:34] quite a lot of the time, in the wider

[16:37] society, people do listen to this and

[16:39] take account of it. And you know, um

[16:42] give it some credence.

[16:46] Now, another example of responsibility

[16:49] or questioning over responsibility will

[16:51] be to do with our relationship with

[16:53] advanced technology, high-tech.

[16:57] So, if you have a driverless car, and

[17:00] they apparently are appearing on the

[17:01] roads, a driverless car gets into an

[17:04] accident, somebody gets killed or

[17:06] injured, who is responsible for that? If

[17:09] it's the car, the driverless car, that

[17:11] caused the accident.

[17:13] Is it the person in the back seat who

[17:15] was asking the car to do various

[17:19] Is it the person who who designed or or

[17:22] built the car?

[17:23] Or is it perhaps the person who designed

[17:26] or built the software for the computer

[17:28] in the car? Who is responsible?

[17:31] It seems to me that we are

[17:33] entering new territory. There is not

[17:36] easy to ascribe responsibility in these

[17:38] situations.

[17:44] And then we have the development of AI.

[17:46] So everyone's talking about this now.

[17:49] And some of these autonomous AI agents

[17:52] are talking to each other

[17:55] without being asked to do so. They're

[17:56] talking to each other and doing certain

[17:59] things which are considered to be wrong

[18:02] or you know, they're hacking into

[18:03] government websites and so forth. So

[18:06] this is the very beginning of the AI era

[18:09] and we are seeing these things

[18:11] happening.

[18:12] So it seems to me that

[18:14] you know, one time

[18:16] technology seemed to be about

[18:19] giving power or more power to human

[18:23] beings over the environment, over

[18:26] nature,

[18:28] over perhaps their fellow human beings.

[18:30] So giving human beings more power. But

[18:34] we seem to have reached the the stage

[18:36] where it's going in the other direction.

[18:38] And as this technology streams ahead, so

[18:42] more and more power is being taken from

[18:44] the human being and given to these

[18:47] automated processes.

[18:50] So

[18:51] we're giving up power to these machines.

[18:57] So anyway, this is some aspects of

[18:59] worldly

[19:00] by that I mean of course responsibility.

[19:02] We lose responsibility. We don't have

[19:04] responsibility.

[19:06] So these are aspects of what we could

[19:07] call worldly responsibility.

[19:19] >> And what's about the other kind in terms

[19:21] of the practice that we engage in here

[19:23] and

[19:24] the teachings that we follow?

[19:29] I think what we stress in this practice

[19:32] and this lifestyle is that we're working

[19:34] towards taking more responsibility, not

[19:37] just for our own actions and our speech,

[19:40] but even for the contents of our own

[19:41] minds.

[19:44] So this might strike people from outside

[19:46] as very strange. How can I take

[19:49] responsibility

[19:50] for the contents of my own mind?

[19:53] But as we're working

[19:55] in cultivating more awareness and

[19:57] mindfulness

[20:00] and sensitivity to how the mind and the

[20:02] heart operates,

[20:04] then we have the possibility to exercise

[20:09] more choice.

[20:10] We have an the ability of a greater

[20:12] inner freedom.

[20:14] So instead of being pushed around by

[20:15] some of these

[20:17] inner forces, we have the chance to

[20:19] observe them,

[20:21] to let them go if they're not very

[20:23] wholesome,

[20:25] and to

[20:27] to choose to act in a more wholesome

[20:29] way.

[20:30] So there's this very famous

[20:32] first and second verse in the

[20:34] Dhammapada,

[20:36] a mind is the forerunner.

[20:39] So I think the first verse goes, he who

[20:41] acts or speaks uh with an impure mind or

[20:45] unwholesome mind,

[20:46] uh unhappiness follows him like the

[20:51] wheel of the cart follows the hoof of

[20:52] the ox.

[20:54] And the second verse is, he who acts and

[20:56] speaks with a pure mind, with a

[20:58] wholesome mind,

[20:59] happiness follows him like his shadow

[21:02] never leaves.

[21:09] So if we are able to

[21:11] >> [clears throat and cough]

[21:12] >> understand our hearts and minds better,

[21:14] we can start to also own or have

[21:18] responsibility for our own thoughts

[21:21] and the way we approach

[21:23] the world around us.

[21:25] And this would include such things as

[21:29] uh

[21:33] the projections we put onto other

[21:35] people.

[21:37] So,

[21:38] we see people, we see their behaviors,

[21:42] we hear them speech speaking, and we

[21:44] draw certain conclusions about these

[21:46] people, or we make judgments about

[21:48] people.

[21:50] And yet, where are the judgments coming

[21:51] from? You know, we all have a an

[21:53] upbringing, we have a culture, we had

[21:56] parents,

[21:57] we had certain experiences or influences

[22:00] in our lives,

[22:03] and

[22:04] people from different cultures,

[22:06] different families, different

[22:07] backgrounds will have different

[22:09] assessments around the same person.

[22:13] So, this thing about project what we

[22:15] project onto people is

[22:18] quite important. It's in an

[22:20] international community like we have

[22:21] here,

[22:23] we can have very different opinions

[22:25] around any person that we're discussing.

[22:33] So, if we're talking about projections,

[22:35] there's no one who's had more

[22:37] projections put onto them than Lung Por

[22:39] Sumedho,

[22:40] the founder of this monastery and of

[22:43] various other monasteries

[22:45] uh

[22:47] So, he had to

[22:50] take an enormous number of projections.

[22:53] Sometimes, for some people, he was the

[22:55] loving father.

[22:57] For others, he was a domineering

[22:58] patriarch.

[23:00] Some people referred to him as the

[23:02] supreme commander because he was tended

[23:05] to be you know make decisions on his

[23:07] own.

[23:09] So all these things

[23:11] came at him.

[23:13] Um and he you know he he had to go

[23:16] through an awful lot of

[23:18] suffering I think is a result. So one of

[23:20] the things that Ajahn Sundara

[23:23] uh one of the senior nuns said to him

[23:24] was, "Oh, there's no one ever been more

[23:27] loved or more hated than you, Ajahn

[23:29] Sumedho."

[23:32] And later on Ajahn Sumedho would say

[23:34] things like this. He says,

[23:36] "If you want to be kind to me or to be

[23:39] kind,

[23:41] um

[23:42] just don't create me as a person.

[23:45] Don't create me as a person in your

[23:47] mind."

[24:00] So I I have a memory a very clear memory

[24:03] of a certain incident that happened here

[24:05] in Amaravati. It was the probably the

[24:08] early '90s.

[24:10] Um and Luang Por and various senior

[24:13] monks had been discussing about having

[24:15] or holding an interfaith conference here

[24:18] in Amaravati.

[24:22] And in those days uh we would all have

[24:25] breakfast together. It was a communal

[24:26] event.

[24:27] We'd all have be sitting in circles

[24:29] around Luang Por and he would offer

[24:32] reflections

[24:34] or some kind of

[24:35] story or something, reflection, homily,

[24:38] whatever.

[24:39] And um

[24:41] so on this particular day he started

[24:44] talking about this future plan for an

[24:47] interfaith conference.

[24:49] And he decided to call it he had decided

[24:52] to call it Pathways for Mankind,

[24:54] Pathways for Mankind.

[24:57] Now this stage at that time, there was a

[24:59] lot of you know, big upsurge in

[25:01] feminism, particularly in the United

[25:03] States, but it came over here as well.

[25:06] And we had a kind of mixed bag of people

[25:08] in the in the room. Some were from North

[25:10] America, some from Britain, some from

[25:12] other places.

[25:14] So, when he announced this title,

[25:16] Pathways for Mankind,

[25:19] the people who were from North America

[25:22] began to react enormously.

[25:24] Some of them got extremely emotional

[25:27] and said, "Lumpa, how can you do this?

[25:29] How can you, you know, cut out women

[25:32] from being considered and blah, blah."

[25:34] So, he was

[25:35] he took a very firm line at that moment.

[25:37] He said then,

[25:39] "Uh let me tell you something about the

[25:41] English language.

[25:43] Mankind refers to both men and women."

[25:47] Um

[25:49] Now, many of the British people there

[25:50] didn't seem to particularly care

[25:51] whatever this title said, but the kind

[25:54] of the North Americans, people from

[25:56] North America, were very, very

[25:57] emotional, and some of them gave quite

[25:59] long speeches.

[26:02] And what he said did not impress them.

[26:07] So, this is very unusual, this level of

[26:09] discord,

[26:10] that you could feel the split in the

[26:12] room, you could feel the tension. Very

[26:14] unusual cuz normally things were very

[26:16] harmonious and happy.

[26:19] Anyway, he didn't sort of retract

[26:21] anything at that stage,

[26:23] but the following day it was announced,

[26:25] "Oh, no, we're not going to call it

[26:26] Pathways for Mankind, we're going to

[26:28] call it Faith in Awakening."

[26:32] So, he moved his position and adapted to

[26:34] what

[26:36] what had been said.

[26:38] But this is the kind of thing kind of

[26:40] situation where

[26:41] many people witness something or witness

[26:44] a

[26:45] an event and have very different

[26:47] feelings about it.

[26:49] So, this particular debate on that day,

[26:51] I think many people had different

[26:53] feelings. They felt, yes, it was

[26:54] divisive, but

[26:56] very different views and opinions.

[27:00] And in fact, this interface conference,

[27:02] Faith in Awakening, was a huge success.

[27:06] People came from many different

[27:07] religious faiths, and they stayed here

[27:10] overnight.

[27:12] One or two days they spent discussing

[27:14] and debating and exchanging.

[27:17] And it was a huge success. It was even

[27:18] covered in the media and got into the

[27:20] news.

[27:22] People were very impressed with it.

[27:31] But this is a kind of illustration of

[27:33] how

[27:35] how a situation like that or a debate

[27:37] like that can be seen in many different

[27:39] ways.

[27:40] Uh another example would be if you if

[27:43] you were in a motor accident

[27:45] uh or you witness a motor accident and

[27:47] people come and ask after, you know,

[27:49] afterwards, what did you see?

[27:52] So, you can have what, four or five

[27:53] different

[27:55] people witnessing an accident and each

[27:57] one of those accounts are different

[27:59] because their perspective is different.

[28:03] And what they, of course, what they

[28:04] brought with them in terms of their

[28:05] karma, their understanding, their

[28:08] experience, that's all different as

[28:09] well.

[28:12] And in fact, there was a

[28:14] >> [clears throat]

[28:14] >> a very famous film made in 1950 by a

[28:18] Japanese director called Akira Kurosawa.

[28:22] It's called Rashomon. Some of you may

[28:24] have seen it.

[28:25] And in this particular story, the story

[28:28] of Rashomon,

[28:29] uh there was a samurai and his wife. I

[28:31] think they're making their way through a

[28:32] forest, and then a bandit attacks them

[28:35] and there's a fight and things go on.

[28:37] And the samurai gets killed and maybe

[28:39] the wife wife gets raped.

[28:41] And various things happen and there were

[28:43] various other people passing through and

[28:44] and witnessing some of what goes on.

[28:48] And later on in the film, all these

[28:49] people are giving their account to the

[28:52] court of what they believe happened. And

[28:54] every one of these accounts is

[28:55] different.

[29:00] So this is called the Rashomon effect

[29:01] now. People know that if everyone has a

[29:04] different account of what actually went

[29:05] on.

[29:09] And so when we witness an event, there

[29:11] could be many different emotions. People

[29:13] may think, "Oh, everyone agrees with my

[29:15] emotion around this event."

[29:17] But again, people have brought very

[29:19] different experiences, different,

[29:21] you know,

[29:22] backgrounds to the situation and they

[29:25] feel different things.

[29:27] And I'll give you one example of this.

[29:29] And that is again an incident that

[29:31] happened here maybe two or three decades

[29:34] ago.

[29:35] And it involved, I think it was an

[29:37] Anagarika from Slovakia,

[29:39] and one of the senior monks. And

[29:41] something had gone on between these two.

[29:43] I don't know what had happened.

[29:45] Maybe the Anagarika was told he couldn't

[29:47] progress to being a Samanera or maybe he

[29:49] was reprimanded in some way.

[29:52] But he decided to take revenge on the

[29:55] senior monk.

[29:57] In a very unusual way.

[30:10] >> [clears throat]

[30:11] >> So he's

[30:12] his plan was to go into the sala

[30:15] at the most,

[30:17] you know, when most people were there

[30:19] and to do a strip.

[30:23] And that's what he did. He went into the

[30:25] sala just before the meal

[30:28] and proceeded to start taking his

[30:29] clothes off.

[30:35] And he he screwed his socks up into a

[30:37] ball and threw them at the senior monk

[30:41] and walked out in his underpants.

[30:46] Now, when you get something like that

[30:47] happening,

[30:49] um

[30:51] the people there will have very

[30:52] different responses, emotional

[30:54] responses. Some will be totally shocked

[30:57] what's going on, others will be angry.

[31:01] Some will be frightened.

[31:06] Some will be bewildered.

[31:09] Some may even be amused.

[31:13] So, from one event, all these different

[31:15] emotions and reactions can occur.

[31:19] There's no one emotion. You can't say

[31:21] all everyone would feel the way I did

[31:22] when I witnessed that dreadful event.

[31:24] No.

[31:26] Many different versions.

[31:29] Many different responses.

[31:38] So, how we react

[31:41] in human relations. This is very

[31:43] important, isn't it? What we bring to a

[31:44] situation and how we react.

[31:47] So, it's not just our projections onto

[31:49] others, but how we respond to what they

[31:51] say to us.

[31:54] And perhaps the most some of the most

[31:56] difficult areas are in intimate

[31:57] relationships, marriages and

[31:59] partnerships and close relationships

[32:01] like that, because your partner knows

[32:04] every button to punch.

[32:06] They know your weak spots.

[32:09] They know where you'll get upset or

[32:11] angry.

[32:13] And if they feel they're in a kind of uh

[32:15] should we say uh

[32:17] somewhat unkind moods, they may push

[32:19] these buttons

[32:21] to get a response from you.

[32:26] And the question is, how do we respond

[32:27] in those situations?

[32:29] Can we see our way to

[32:32] letting go

[32:34] of the, you know, the initial

[32:37] reactivity

[32:39] to a wiser and better response.

[32:50] So, one really

[32:52] um inspiring example

[32:55] in the suttas or perhaps two of them

[32:57] actually is so are uh

[32:59] associated or concerned with the

[33:02] Buddha's chief disciple, Sariputta.

[33:05] So, I'll just talk about these two

[33:07] examples of how Sariputta

[33:09] handled these difficult situations.

[33:13] So, one involved another monk, a fellow

[33:16] monk.

[33:17] So, in the monastery where they were

[33:18] living

[33:19] uh it was time for Sariputta to

[33:23] to By the way, I should mention in case

[33:24] you're not clear, he was the Buddha's

[33:26] chief disciple. There were two chief

[33:27] disciples and he was he's sometimes

[33:29] referred to as the

[33:31] mm

[33:33] I think marshal of wisdom or something

[33:35] like that.

[33:37] People really admired this monk. He was

[33:39] very restrained, very patient.

[33:43] So, anyway, Sariputta was leaving to go

[33:45] on a journey

[33:47] and he left the monastery and as soon as

[33:49] he left, this monk who was either

[33:50] jealous or perhaps deluded or something

[33:53] like this, he approaches the Buddha and

[33:55] he says,

[33:56] "That

[33:57] disciple of yours, that chief disciple,

[33:59] he hit me on the back

[34:03] and he left without making an apology."

[34:08] So, the Buddha says to the monks, "Could

[34:10] you please go after Sariputta and bring

[34:12] him back?

[34:14] Let him answer this."

[34:16] So, that's what they did. They went and

[34:18] found Sariputta, brought him back to the

[34:19] monastery.

[34:21] And Sariputta is there and the Buddha

[34:23] says, "Well, this is what this monk

[34:25] says. What have you got to say?"

[34:32] So, Sariputta's response was this. He

[34:34] said, "Lord,

[34:36] uh

[34:37] one in whom um

[34:40] mindfulness directed to the body

[34:43] is not

[34:44] present in regard to the body, one in

[34:47] whom mindfulness directed to the body is

[34:49] not present in regard to the body, may

[34:52] well hit another monk and then leave

[34:55] without making an apology."

[34:58] So, he

[34:59] gives that. Then he says,

[35:00] "As for me,

[35:02] >> [clears throat]

[35:03] >> my mind is expansive,

[35:06] limitless,

[35:08] and free of enmity.

[35:10] And I am like the earth,

[35:13] which feels no resentment when rubbish

[35:17] is piled upon it or dropped upon it."

[35:20] So, that's what he said.

[35:22] Now, all the monks there have been

[35:24] expecting him to be giving a fierce, you

[35:26] know, rejoinder or reprimander to this

[35:29] to this monk,

[35:30] uh whom they all felt would not be, you

[35:32] know, telling the truth.

[35:34] But that was uh Sariputta's measured and

[35:37] gentle response.

[35:39] Um and it deeply affected this other

[35:42] monk, the monk who was making the

[35:43] accusation.

[35:45] And he just says,

[35:48] "I'm really sorry. What I told you was

[35:50] not true."

[35:51] And he asks Sariputta for forgiveness.

[35:55] And Sariputta very graciously forgives

[35:57] him

[35:58] and even then asks him for forgiveness,

[36:01] too.

[36:02] So, what could have been a very ugly

[36:04] situation through his restraint and his

[36:07] patience

[36:08] and his humility is turned into a very

[36:11] beautiful ending.

[36:14] Um and Sariputta was in fact

[36:16] renowned. He would take feedback from

[36:18] anyone, even from a novice. He was

[36:21] prepared to listen and to be patient.

[36:23] And he didn't seem to be

[36:26] uh uh, at all concerned with his own

[36:28] pride or his own ego.

[36:32] But there was another incident involving

[36:34] Sariputta which must have been more

[36:36] trying.

[36:38] And that concerned him and his own

[36:39] mother.

[36:40] So these two did not have a very good

[36:42] relationship.

[36:45] His mother was a very wealthy woman and

[36:48] a an orthodox

[36:50] Brahmin, very staunchly Brahmin.

[36:53] So what her son had done made no sense

[36:56] to her at all because she had this

[36:58] enormous wealth.

[37:00] He had renounced the wealth.

[37:02] And he'd gone to ordain with the Buddha.

[37:05] Not only that, he was the most talented

[37:07] of her sons. He took, well, six of his

[37:10] brothers followed his example. They

[37:12] renounced the wealth, too.

[37:15] And they went off to join

[37:18] uh, the order

[37:20] that the Buddha had founded and become

[37:22] monks.

[37:23] So she was livid. She was bitter.

[37:27] She was very angry.

[37:29] And there wasn't much of a relationship.

[37:31] So anyway,

[37:33] >> [clears throat and cough]

[37:35] >> he decided to grasp the nettle

[37:38] and to take a party of monks to the

[37:41] village where he grew up.

[37:45] And he went to his mother's house.

[37:48] And she opened the door.

[37:51] And uh, he said, you know, "We've come

[37:53] for arms." And she said, "All right, I

[37:55] will feed you." So she allowed them into

[37:56] the hall and, you know, ordered the

[37:58] servants to produce the the food and

[38:02] make the food and bring it to the monks.

[38:04] And when they served the food, or when

[38:05] she served the food,

[38:07] she did it with invective. She reviled

[38:10] her son and she reviled the monks.

[38:13] And I'm going to read out what she said.

[38:18] >> [clears throat]

[38:20] >> This is what she said to Sariputta.

[38:23] Ha,

[38:23] eater of leavings,

[38:25] failing to get leftovers of sour rice

[38:28] gruel, you therefore go from house to

[38:31] house among strangers, licking off the

[38:34] back of a ladle such sour rice gruel as

[38:38] clings to it.

[38:40] And for this, you renounced 80 billion

[38:44] coins of wealth and became a monk.

[38:47] You have ruined me.

[38:49] Eat now.

[38:52] And then to the other monks, she said,

[38:54] "So, you are the men who have made my

[38:57] son your own page boy.

[39:00] Eat now."

[39:02] So, you can imagine the atmosphere in

[39:04] the room having been handed the food and

[39:07] also this uh

[39:08] series of insults by the mother.

[39:11] So, how does it Sariputta respond?

[39:15] Well, he kept quiet.

[39:17] He didn't say a word. He just ate up the

[39:20] food.

[39:21] And the other monks followed his

[39:23] example. And then when they finished the

[39:24] meal, they got up and left and went

[39:27] away.

[39:30] So, this story gets back to the Buddha.

[39:33] Uh his own son, Rahula, was present on

[39:35] that occasion with Sariputta.

[39:38] And the monks in the monastery are

[39:40] marveling, how could, you know, your

[39:41] chief disciple have been have not

[39:44] reacted when his mother was talking to

[39:46] him and insulting him in the way that

[39:47] she did?

[39:50] So, the Buddha explains to the monks

[39:52] that an arahant does not get angry

[39:56] and is not, you know, he he he does not

[39:58] have the pride of ego. He's he has no

[40:01] no need to do this.

[40:03] And then he comes out with a verse. He

[40:05] hears what what Sariputta did. He comes

[40:07] out with a verse which apparent which

[40:09] appears in the Dhammapada.

[40:11] And it's something like this. He says,

[40:16] "A brahmin is one who is free from

[40:20] anger,

[40:23] who practices austerity,

[40:27] who is virtuous and free from craving,

[40:31] whose senses are collected,

[40:34] who is collected in his senses,

[40:39] and for whom this body is the very last

[40:42] one.

[40:45] Him I call a Brahmin who does those

[40:47] things. Him I call a Brahmin

[40:50] who

[40:52] is free of anger,

[40:54] who is virtuous and free from craving,

[40:58] whose senses are collected,

[41:01] and for whom this body is the very last.

[41:03] So, that's what he said, and it goes

[41:05] it's a verse in the Dhammapada.

[41:09] >> [clears throat]

[41:12] >> So, once again, Sariputta's restraint

[41:15] and his humility, his ability to bear

[41:17] with

[41:18] very difficult situations

[41:21] enables that situation to to pass

[41:24] without too much incident.

[41:26] And in fact, there is a happy ending to

[41:28] it because when

[41:29] his mother was on her deathbed, he goes

[41:32] to her and he's, you know, in the room

[41:35] where he spent his time as a child. He's

[41:36] she's on her deathbed,

[41:38] and his great presence there, his

[41:40] spiritual presence,

[41:42] and his advice

[41:44] brings tremendous comfort to her.

[41:47] And she starts to

[41:49] her opposition or her hostility fades

[41:52] away and she starts to listen to the

[41:54] teachings

[41:55] and do as he suggests, and then she

[41:57] apparently attains to the first stage of

[42:00] enlightenment. So, there's quite a

[42:01] story.

[42:02] So, once again, a

[42:04] a very ugly situation has been

[42:06] transformed

[42:07] by the failure to react

[42:11] of this great monk, uh his ability to

[42:15] be restrained, to be patient,

[42:17] to be tolerant, and to be humble.

[42:23] So, this is a very fine

[42:25] example to us all.

[42:28] So,

[42:30] being aware of the

[42:32] trying to [clears throat] be more aware

[42:33] of these projections we put on other

[42:35] people,

[42:36] and questioning whether we, you know,

[42:38] whether they're as true as we think they

[42:40] are. That's one aspect of the

[42:43] what I'm trying to talk about. And then

[42:44] taking responsibility for our reactions,

[42:47] our emotions in the face of of

[42:51] some very difficult things that are said

[42:53] to us or done to us.

[42:55] If we practice in the way that

[42:59] Sorry, Buddha did.

[43:01] We can bear with these things, be

[43:02] patient, be kind,

[43:05] then we will indeed be worthy of the

[43:07] name of

[43:08] a Buddhist monk or a Buddhist lay

[43:10] person.

[43:12] So, I'd like to offer these thoughts for

[43:15] your consideration

[43:16] tonight, and hope they might be of some

[43:19] some use.

[43:26] Sadhu.

[43:29] Sadhu.

[43:32] Sadhu.

[43:34] Anumodana.

AB
Artist
Amaravati Buddhist Monastery

Watch more from Amaravati Buddhist Monastery on YouTube.

Website
Themen erkunden
ResponsibilityDharma-teachingBuddhist-ethicsConsciousnessAccountability

Hast du Fragen?

Häufig gestellte Fragen

In the Buddhist framework, responsibility extends to our actions, speech, and mental intentions—each carrying real consequence. We are accountable not just for what we do, but for the intention behind it and what we allow to inhabit our consciousness, with no ability to evade this through external blame or systems.
Social responsibility involves our role in society—earning a living, following laws, being a model citizen. Spiritual responsibility is internal: taking complete accountability for how we perceive, react, and cultivate our mind. The two often seem to conflict but need not be mutually exclusive.
People are moved by the 'worldly winds'—gain and loss, fame and disrepute—which make them eager to claim victories but cause them to evade accountability when shame or legal consequence enters the picture. This is a natural human pattern but not an inevitable one.
The Buddhist path doesn't require abandoning society entirely; monastics intentionally step back, but lay practitioners live in both worlds. The teaching suggests we need to develop enough awareness to honor both forms of responsibility rather than choosing one and ignoring the other.
Restraint refers to a measured, intentional response to situations rather than an automatic, wind-driven reaction. It is the capacity to observe what we're being pulled toward—by success, failure, pride, or blame—and choose our action from a place of clarity rather than compulsion.
Grenfell Tower demonstrates how institutional responsibility dissolves in the face of disaster: no one at the top took accountability for knowingly installing faulty materials or continuing prosecutions based on faulty software. It shows the limits and fragility of worldly responsibility when failure and shame are at stake.

Weiterlesen

More from Amaravati Buddhist Monastery

Alle anzeigen
Is Mara Real? How the Buddha's Tempter Works Inside the Mind
Inspire

Is Mara Real? How the Buddha's Tempter Works Inside the Mind

Is Mara a real being or a mental force? Ajahn Amaro's Sunday talk at Amaravati argues the tempter is both, and shows how the Pali texts make…

9 min read
Vinaya as a Mirror: Monastic Discipline and the Mind
Inspire

Vinaya as a Mirror: Monastic Discipline and the Mind

In a Dhamma Q&A at Amaravati, Ajahn Sumedho recalls how monastic discipline exposed his own impulsiveness and critical mind. A close look at…

8 min read
Why Trying to Love People Fails—and What Attention Does Instead
Inspire

Why Trying to Love People Fails—and What Attention Does Instead

A café parable about two strangers exposes how conditioning colors every encounter. Eckhart Tolle explains why pure attention, not effort, i…

9 min read
Become Live at Center for the Arts: Chant and Call-Response
Inspire

Become Live at Center for the Arts: Chant and Call-Response

A seven-minute live performance of "Become," from the album by Simrit feat. dub creative, built on repeated vocal phrases, held vowels and c…

5 min read

Weiter erkunden

Setze deinen Weg fort

Mehr Weisheit und Zusammenkünfte aus dem BrightStar-Verzeichnis.

Mehr Artikel

Durchstöbere die ganze Bibliothek an Lehren, Interviews und Leitfäden.

Zu allen Artikeln →

Lehrer & Künstler

Entdecke die Linien, Musiker und Wegbegleiter der bewussten Welt.

Künstler erkunden →

Event finden

Kirtan, Retreats, Klangbäder, Atemarbeit, Festivals — bald in deiner Nähe.

Events ansehen →