Transcript
[0:00] Our consciousness interacts with a wider
[0:03] consciousness and in this interface a
[0:06] lot of
[0:07] interesting unexplained stuff happens.
[0:12] Um, I think it just so happens that
[0:16] consciousness, the survival of our
[0:18] consciousness post material death, um,
[0:22] manifests on this interface. But I think
[0:25] a range of other phenomena do as well. I
[0:27] mean, there's the near-death experience,
[0:29] there is the out-of-body experience,
[0:31] there's remote viewing.
[0:33] But in terms of the UFO phenomenon,
[0:38] I think that also resides somewhere on
[0:40] this interface in that at times the
[0:44] phenomenon takes on a physical aspect
[0:47] and there are and and and when it takes
[0:50] on that attribute, you could, again
[0:52] metaphorically, pick up a brick, throw
[0:55] it against that UFO, and that brick is
[0:57] going to go clang because in that moment
[0:59] that UFO is real. But there is another
[1:02] aspect to the UFO phenomenon which is,
[1:05] um,
[1:05] more metaphysical and has, as others
[1:09] have documented, um, psychic qualities
[1:12] to it.
[1:13] >> Keep watching to learn more. New
[1:15] Thinking Allowed is presented by the
[1:17] California Institute for Human Science,
[1:20] a fully accredited university offering
[1:23] distant learning graduate degrees that
[1:26] focus on mind, body, and spirit. The
[1:29] topics that we cover here, we are
[1:31] particularly excited to announce new
[1:33] degrees emphasizing parapsychology
[1:37] and the paranormal. Visit their website
[1:39] at c i h s dot e d u. The New Thinking
[1:44] Allowed magazine issue 10 on UFOs and
[1:47] UAP is now ready for free download and
[1:51] you can also order beautiful printed
[1:53] copies. Go to newthinkingallowed.org.
[1:59] For early access to our videos and live
[2:03] stream events, sign up for our free
[2:06] weekly newsletter at new thinking
[2:09] aloud.org.
[2:13] >> Book four in the New Thinking Allowed
[2:15] Dialogue Series is Charles T. Tart, 70
[2:19] Years of Exploring Consciousness and
[2:23] Parapsychology,
[2:25] now available on Amazon.
[2:37] >> [music]
[2:41] >> Thinking Allowed
[2:44] Conversations [music]
[2:45] on the leading edge of knowledge and
[2:47] discovery with psychologist [music]
[2:50] Jeffrey Mishlove.
[2:54] >> [music]
[2:57] >> Hello and welcome. I'm Jeffrey Mishlove.
[3:00] Our topic today is high strangeness UFOs
[3:04] and the afterlife. My guest is Nick
[3:08] Cook, who is the author of 20 fiction
[3:11] and non-fiction titles, including The
[3:14] Hunt for Zero Point, Inside the
[3:17] Classified World of Anti-Gravity
[3:20] Technology,
[3:21] as well as a popular parapsychological
[3:24] thriller, The Grid. He is the former
[3:28] aviation editor of Jane's Defence
[3:31] Weekly. This interview was
[3:34] recorded in a hotel room in Las Vegas
[3:38] where the two of us were attending the
[3:40] Bigelow Institute of Consciousness
[3:43] Studies award ceremony for their essay
[3:46] competition.
[3:48] And now I'll switch over to that video.
[3:52] Welcome, Nick. Why don't we start with
[3:54] the story of your grandmother's death?
[3:58] >> My parents divorced when when I was
[4:01] five.
[4:03] And my sister and I moved in to live
[4:07] with my grandparents, who lived in a
[4:09] sort of quite a large rambling
[4:11] country house in the southeast of
[4:13] England.
[4:15] And about
[4:17] halfway through the time we were there,
[4:19] so we were there for about sort of 3
[4:20] years, so maybe an hour a a year and a
[4:22] half into
[4:24] uh our our living with my grandparents,
[4:26] my grandmother sadly died.
[4:29] And she was
[4:31] uh American, so she sort of did the
[4:33] reverse thing. She came over to England
[4:37] um and married my grandfather.
[4:40] Uh
[4:41] quite a sort of stiff upper lip family,
[4:44] not used to discussing feelings, but my
[4:47] grandmother was a very sort of
[4:49] passionate, you know, as you'd expect
[4:51] from um
[4:53] my American cousins.
[4:55] Passionate and and sort of hot-blooded.
[4:58] And she was also actually interested in
[5:01] the paranormal.
[5:02] So, maybe a
[5:04] couple of days after she died, my father
[5:08] came back to console my grandfather
[5:12] at the house.
[5:14] Now, there had been some rather strange
[5:16] goings-on since my grandmother had died.
[5:19] She used to go up to the attic
[5:22] because she couldn't sleep. She was an
[5:23] insomniac. And she would sweep out the
[5:25] attic. And when she'd been alive, you
[5:28] could hear the clack clack clack of her
[5:29] broom
[5:31] um working against pieces of furniture
[5:33] and the sideboard in the attic. And my
[5:36] father was awoken by this one night to
[5:39] hear this going on. But that wasn't the
[5:41] strangest thing. The strangest thing was
[5:44] he and my grandfather were having a
[5:46] discussion about my grandmother's will.
[5:49] And they disagreed on a point.
[5:51] And at that moment, there was a lamp
[5:54] between them, heavy Victorian lamp that
[5:57] lifted up,
[5:59] did a bit of a tilt and a wobble, and
[6:00] then
[6:01] plonk very loudly back down on the table
[6:04] between them again.
[6:06] Now, obviously, I was only, I don't
[6:08] know, six or seven or something when
[6:10] this happened. So, I I I didn't know
[6:12] anything about it at the time.
[6:13] But my father, who was an engineer and
[6:16] quite a rational person,
[6:18] told the family, this sort of got handed
[6:21] down in family lore
[6:24] afterwards, and including to my sister
[6:26] and me. And
[6:28] you know, it's when you get testimony
[6:30] like that from someone you know and
[6:32] trust, as I obviously did with my dad,
[6:35] who was intensely curious about this
[6:37] incident. I mean, he was obviously at
[6:39] very upset at the time that his mother
[6:41] had died.
[6:42] But he always wanted to know how that
[6:46] lamp had got to pick up in the way that
[6:48] it did, how energy had been transferred
[6:51] from somewhere to that lamp.
[6:54] Um and
[6:56] the sort of the whole consciousness
[6:57] aspect of it, he kind of put to one
[7:00] side. But that was really one of those
[7:03] sort of inciting moments in my life when
[7:06] I thought, well, there's got to be an
[7:08] awful lot more to our existence than is
[7:11] merely set out by sort of our 3D
[7:15] four-dimensional physics.
[7:17] Um so, yeah, that was the story of my
[7:20] grandfa- my grandmother and the lamp.
[7:22] >> There were other events in your family
[7:24] as well?
[7:25] >> Definitely, uh there were. Um
[7:29] I mean, more recently,
[7:31] my
[7:33] uh uh
[7:34] my mother-in-law, um who died in 2014,
[7:37] we all of there were
[7:39] maybe seven or eight of us from
[7:42] her extended family who attended um her
[7:45] while she was dying, including my wife.
[7:49] Um and
[7:51] uh my wife was holding her mom's hand.
[7:54] And at the precise moment that my
[7:56] mother-in-law died,
[7:59] uh my wife, instead of
[8:02] uh the reaction that obviously I
[8:04] anticipated, which was that she would be
[8:06] extremely um upset and distressed at
[8:09] this moment as
[8:11] anyone would be.
[8:12] Um
[8:13] she stood up
[8:15] and said, announced to everyone in the
[8:17] room that all is all is well.
[8:20] And we were all a bit Well, everyone was
[8:23] shocked from what was happening in the
[8:24] room anyway.
[8:25] Um but
[8:27] I was stunned. I mean, I thought,
[8:30] why are you saying this? Because your
[8:32] mom, your you know, dear beloved mom has
[8:34] just this second passed away, and yet
[8:37] you're telling the room that all is
[8:39] well.
[8:40] And I suppose maybe an hour or two later
[8:42] when we were sitting down and I asked my
[8:44] wife about this. I said, why did you say
[8:46] this? And she said to me, weren't you
[8:48] there as well?
[8:50] And I went, where? And she went, well,
[8:52] in that space where uh time stopped, but
[8:56] it stretched infinitely. I was connected
[8:59] to everything. I knew everything. This
[9:01] place was more real than real. And it
[9:05] was imbued with a feeling that I can
[9:07] only describe describe as all
[9:09] encompassing
[9:11] joyous love.
[9:13] And I thought,
[9:16] what is this thing that she's
[9:17] describing? Um I came from a very nuts
[9:22] and bolts background. I'm a technology
[9:25] journalist.
[9:26] But I'm a curious person.
[9:28] And I wanted to know
[9:32] how this person whom I trusted,
[9:35] obviously intimately, we'd been
[9:38] at that point, maybe 25 years. Um and I
[9:42] wanted to know what she was talking
[9:44] about. And when I But when I Googled
[9:46] this thing,
[9:47] um I realized that what she was
[9:49] describing was something called a shared
[9:51] death experience.
[9:53] And
[9:55] that was sort of one of the I suppose it
[9:57] was actually the primary inciting thing
[10:01] that made me want to go and research
[10:03] consciousness because I had to try and
[10:08] rationalize
[10:09] what my wife had discovered. And in a
[10:12] sense, that also linked back to my
[10:15] grandmother's experience, you know, this
[10:16] experience of that my dad had told me
[10:18] about
[10:19] um about my grandmother in the lab. So,
[10:21] those two things combined really set me
[10:23] off on this path and this journey.
[10:25] >> I gather that at the same time you were
[10:28] beginning to explore consciousness, you
[10:31] had already had some exposure to the UFO
[10:34] field.
[10:35] >> For some 15 odd years, I had been the
[10:38] aerospace editor of a publication called
[10:40] Jane's Defence Weekly, uh which is a
[10:42] sort of it's a military affairs journal.
[10:45] It's bought by professionals in the
[10:47] field in the defense field, in the
[10:50] intelligence community field as well.
[10:54] It's a really serious publication and I
[10:56] enjoyed writing for it immensely because
[10:57] it got me all over the world. Uh it got
[11:00] me to meet some very interesting people
[11:03] and to pursue my curiosity about, you
[11:06] know, things sort of um
[11:09] interesting technologically, but also
[11:10] kind of secret things, too.
[11:13] So, uh
[11:15] during some of the early years that I
[11:17] was involved in the job, I was
[11:20] particularly involved in uncovering
[11:24] uh for the magazine um stories about
[11:26] very secret defense projects,
[11:28] particularly aerospace projects that
[11:30] were going on in the US.
[11:32] Um where most, if not all of the really
[11:35] interesting technology was to be had, at
[11:38] least the cutting edge technology.
[11:40] Um, some of this
[11:42] technology, particularly to do with
[11:43] technologies like stealth,
[11:46] you know, were highly secret, but also,
[11:48] um, so shrouded in secrecy that some of
[11:51] the things that people said they saw in
[11:53] the skies, particularly in the desert
[11:55] southwest, um, were often mistaken for
[11:58] UFOs.
[11:59] So, in that sense, my nuts and bolts
[12:03] rationalist job in this very serious
[12:06] publication started to cross over into
[12:10] the UFO domain. But, I was very keen to
[12:13] separate out
[12:15] the stuff that you could explain by
[12:18] technology, science, and engineering
[12:21] with the stuff that couldn't be
[12:22] explained in that way.
[12:24] And, I wrote a book, um,
[12:27] about this called The Hunt for Zero
[12:28] Point, which was my attempt to, uh,
[12:33] segregate out the stuff that you could
[12:35] explain by exotic technology, and
[12:38] that, you know, might, I speculated, be
[12:42] to do with a breakthrough in propulsion
[12:44] physics. So, perhaps some new
[12:47] esoteric form of energy and propulsion
[12:52] which would look an awful lot like you a
[12:56] UFO if you were to build one here on
[12:58] Earth.
[12:59] Um, and I think I sort of did that, at
[13:01] least to my curiosity and satisfaction.
[13:03] I was able to, uh, look at terrestrial
[13:07] technology, and ask the question,
[13:11] are what people commonly say are UFOs,
[13:14] could any of that stuff have been built
[13:16] here on Earth in great secrecy? And, I
[13:18] think, unquestionably, some of it could
[13:20] have been. But,
[13:22] to my mind,
[13:24] a there was a significant proportion of
[13:26] sightings that could not be explained by
[13:30] anything that I would remotely describe
[13:32] as rational.
[13:33] And that always left me intrigued.
[13:37] But I had to sort of professionally put
[13:39] it to one side.
[13:41] Until the US Navy comes out through the
[13:45] New York Times, which had a big story in
[13:47] 2017
[13:50] about how the US Navy had been
[13:52] encountering a plethora of UFOs
[13:58] off the west coast and east coast of the
[14:00] US encountered amongst its carrier
[14:03] battle groups. And these sightings were
[14:07] so well documented and so strange that
[14:12] it sort of emboldened me to go, "Look,
[14:15] you know,
[14:16] this stuff really needs to be
[14:18] acknowledged and talked about now." And
[14:20] I felt confident enough post 2017 to
[14:25] really get my teeth into the subject in
[14:27] a way that I had not before.
[14:29] >> Based on your essay in the Bigelow
[14:31] Institute competition, you see a
[14:34] relationship between survival after
[14:37] death and these mysterious UFO sightings
[14:41] and a wide spectrum of other phenomena.
[14:44] >> If I could come at it the other way or
[14:47] another way, which is to go, you know, I
[14:49] spent a long time looking at exotic
[14:51] technology, nuts and bolts technology.
[14:54] And
[14:56] you know, metaphorically giving that a
[14:58] really good kick, you know, kicking the
[14:59] tires of it.
[15:01] And I realized that when I'd done that,
[15:02] I could explain the stuff that had been
[15:04] built on Earth unquestionably.
[15:07] But that
[15:08] that that other category of sightings
[15:11] which defied a rational explanation
[15:14] needed another approach
[15:16] in my opinion. It it couldn't be
[15:19] explained or analyzed critically by
[15:23] looking at it from a sort of nuts and
[15:24] bolts perspective.
[15:26] >> And you're referring to the reports of
[15:28] the Navy that were released in 2017?
[15:32] You don't believe that there's a
[15:33] mechanical explanation for those
[15:36] sightings?
[15:37] >> Well,
[15:38] I'm sort of jumping ahead a little bit
[15:39] here because I think that there are
[15:41] both. I think the phenomenon
[15:44] the UFO phenomenon is
[15:48] in a sense it gets to the heart of my
[15:50] essay.
[15:51] Because what I'm talking about in the
[15:53] essay is what I call an interface where
[15:57] our consciousness
[15:59] interacts with a wider consciousness and
[16:02] in this interface a lot of
[16:05] interesting unexplained stuff happens.
[16:09] Um, I think it just so happens that
[16:13] consciousness, the survival of our
[16:15] consciousness post material death, um,
[16:19] manifests on this interface.
[16:22] But I think a range of other phenomena
[16:23] do as well. I mean there's the
[16:25] near-death experience, there is the
[16:27] out-of-body experience, there's remote
[16:29] viewing.
[16:31] But in terms of the UFO phenomenon,
[16:35] I think that also resides somewhere on
[16:37] this interface in that at times
[16:41] the phenomenon takes on a physical
[16:43] aspect
[16:44] and there are and and and when it takes
[16:47] on that attribute, you could, again
[16:49] metaphorically, pick up a brick, throw
[16:52] it against that UFO, and that brick is
[16:54] going to go clang. Because in that
[16:56] moment that UFO is real.
[16:58] But there is another aspect to the UFO
[17:00] phenomenon which is, um,
[17:03] more metaphysical and has, as others
[17:06] have documented, um, psychic qualities
[17:09] to it.
[17:11] And there is so much high strangeness
[17:13] around the phenomenon when it is in that
[17:15] state
[17:17] that it then takes on another attribute,
[17:20] this non-physical attribute. And so many
[17:24] people have tried to analyze the UFO
[17:26] phenomenon from the nuts and bolts side.
[17:29] I thought the only way that I felt I
[17:32] could make any headway myself was to
[17:34] come at it from the other direction,
[17:36] which was from this metaphysical,
[17:39] consciousness-related
[17:41] aspect, wherein
[17:43] the appearance of other phenomena
[17:46] alongside
[17:48] the
[17:49] uh the UFO itself. To wit,
[17:52] perhaps poltergeist phenomena,
[17:54] to wit, perhaps um
[17:57] instances of uh psychokinesis,
[18:01] uh telepathy, uh even
[18:04] uh strange as it may sound,
[18:07] you know, crypto the appearance of
[18:09] cryptozoological creatures alongside
[18:12] these reported phenomena.
[18:14] All of that seems to
[18:16] uh reside on this spectrum.
[18:18] And so
[18:20] uh
[18:21] that's the direction that I wanted to
[18:23] take a look at it from.
[18:25] >> Out of the blue, at some point, you
[18:27] received a grant from a billionaire to
[18:29] begin to explore this area.
[18:32] >> Yeah, it's extraordinary the way these
[18:35] uh things work because
[18:37] um I
[18:39] after my wife's
[18:42] uh shared death experience with her mom,
[18:44] uh I wanted to um
[18:48] get my teeth into the whole
[18:49] consciousness field.
[18:51] But it wasn't my field. So, sort of
[18:53] professionally, I had no excuse at all
[18:56] to go off and investigate it. Um you
[18:58] know, we've all got to put bread on the
[18:59] table, and my uh profession
[19:02] uh lay elsewhere.
[19:04] But in addition to being
[19:06] a uh non-fiction writer, I occasionally
[19:11] dip into the world of fiction, and I
[19:13] write thrillers.
[19:15] Um I felt that
[19:17] having done a bit of background research
[19:19] on what happened to my wife and her
[19:21] mother-in-law and my mother-in-law, her
[19:23] mom,
[19:24] um this this shared death phenomenon,
[19:27] um
[19:28] I I put some of that research into this
[19:30] thriller, a book that came out in 2019
[19:33] called uh The Grid,
[19:36] which deals with this this aspect.
[19:39] Um
[19:40] But I became so intrigued by it still
[19:43] that I wanted to continue that research,
[19:46] but I had no means
[19:48] legitimately uh to pursue it
[19:50] professionally.
[19:51] But
[19:52] uh
[19:53] I I [laughter] I expressed this ambition
[19:57] through a um
[19:59] a little sort of
[20:01] aphorism mantra that I wrote on my wall
[20:03] at the beginning of 2019,
[20:05] which was I said, "I would like to uh
[20:10] this is a sort of goal for the next year
[20:12] or or the year ahead. I would like to uh
[20:16] work with the world's leading um
[20:20] researchers in the consciousness field."
[20:24] Um
[20:25] and left it at that. I had no means
[20:29] by which to accomplish this or achieve
[20:31] it because it was so outside the field
[20:34] that I had been working in and up to
[20:37] that point. But then, lo and behold,
[20:40] I get this grant from um a a uh a
[20:44] philanthropic
[20:46] um
[20:47] individual who I met, and he said, "Uh I
[20:51] would like
[20:52] to help." But in fact,
[20:54] we've never discussed what my interests
[20:56] were, but somehow he intuited that what
[21:00] I was interested in was this
[21:01] consciousness field, and wanted to put
[21:04] some money towards helping my research
[21:06] it. And that's happened, and and that
[21:08] that is what happened. I got this grant
[21:10] from him to pursue the subject of
[21:12] consciousness for the next 2 years,
[21:15] which ultimately gave me the research
[21:19] material that I put into the Bix essay.
[21:22] >> I know for example along the way you met
[21:24] my good friend Gail Huson, who has been
[21:27] a guest on this channel several times.
[21:30] She's a remarkable individual who
[21:32] recommended to me that we should get
[21:34] together. She thought the world of you.
[21:37] >> Well, I think the world of Gail. She she
[21:40] is
[21:41] Gail is as you know Jeff is she's a
[21:44] shaman.
[21:46] She again
[21:48] shamanism was something way outside my
[21:52] knowledge base.
[21:54] But when I was researching the
[21:58] consciousness field, I was particularly
[22:00] interested to approach
[22:03] the the the field of consciousness from
[22:05] a sort of omnidirectional
[22:08] aspect. So I wanted to
[22:11] I wanted to get in touch with
[22:14] experiences
[22:16] in multidisciplinary realms. So you
[22:19] know, remote viewing, near death
[22:21] experiences, out of body experiences,
[22:24] shamans,
[22:26] channelers, you know, the plethora.
[22:29] And
[22:31] through talking to each of them, I
[22:32] wanted to see whether there were there
[22:34] were any shared characteristics of their
[22:36] experience that might inform the
[22:39] consciousness field as a whole for me.
[22:44] I had no idea how to begin approaching a
[22:47] shaman. I didn't know any.
[22:49] We don't have too many
[22:51] who live around us or lived around us at
[22:53] the time in Southwest London.
[22:55] So I approached Dean Radin
[22:59] because I had a
[23:02] mutual we have a mutual friend and he
[23:05] put me in touch with a range of
[23:06] experiences
[23:08] including Gail Highson.
[23:10] And so through Dean
[23:13] because it came through Dean whose you
[23:15] know reputation in this field is
[23:17] stellar.
[23:18] I knew that in a sense he'd already done
[23:20] the due diligence on these people.
[23:22] I didn't need to check them out to know
[23:25] whether they were reliable or kosher or
[23:27] you know any of that stuff. He
[23:29] Dean had already done that. Um and that
[23:33] was how I met Gail and she was able to
[23:36] tell me you know remarkable things about
[23:37] how she works and her own experiences of
[23:40] shamanism and
[23:42] so
[23:44] thanks to Dean.
[23:45] >> You found some common elements in these
[23:48] diverse areas. Some people might think
[23:51] that shamanism for example is completely
[23:54] separate from UFOs.
[23:56] >> To my satisfaction anyway I was able to
[23:59] find a good many common elements between
[24:01] these experiences.
[24:04] Who include amongst them of course of
[24:06] course those who have experimented with
[24:10] psychedelics. Um
[24:13] you know
[24:14] whether it's LSD or DMT or whatever. Um
[24:17] and
[24:18] what I found I found two striking I mean
[24:22] this is this was a
[24:24] a non-scientific
[24:26] survey. I didn't um
[24:29] I didn't gather the data with the rigor
[24:31] that would be in part that would be
[24:33] approved of in a sort of empirical study
[24:37] but it it passed muster for me that
[24:40] there were a number of commonalities
[24:42] amongst all of these experiences which
[24:45] led to
[24:47] two common things for me that were I
[24:49] mean there were a range of common things
[24:51] but two things stood out when I put when
[24:53] I cross reference the data. One of which
[24:56] was
[24:57] encounters with entities. There were
[25:01] beings, spirit-like beings, entities, I
[25:04] mean, call them what you will,
[25:06] that
[25:07] all of these experiences said they
[25:09] encountered when they were in state,
[25:13] whatever that state
[25:15] was or however they came to be in that
[25:17] state.
[25:18] In Gail's case, it was a shamanistic
[25:21] encounter, but in Eben Alexander's, of
[25:24] course, it was a near-death experience.
[25:27] Um
[25:29] So, that was one interesting point for
[25:30] me. They they had this common point of
[25:33] reference of uh encounters with beings
[25:37] whom they felt to be
[25:39] um
[25:40] uh uh uh
[25:41] consciousnesses in their own right, in
[25:43] that they had
[25:45] uh uh uh
[25:46] their own, if you like,
[25:48] individuality about them and their own
[25:50] individual mode of expression.
[25:53] The second was um a uh a uh uh uh uh
[25:59] an encounter with what they felt was
[26:01] the
[26:02] came under a different range of names.
[26:05] Source,
[26:06] uh
[26:07] the source, a source, the source, the
[26:10] creator, the absolute, um a point of
[26:15] infinite vibration and light
[26:19] that I suppose some might call God.
[26:23] Um and that for me was
[26:26] uh those were the two really interesting
[26:29] points that stood out in this
[26:31] omnidirectional sort of survey that I'd
[26:33] done,
[26:34] which uh told me something deeply
[26:39] numinous about the quality of
[26:40] consciousness, um but which again
[26:44] allowed me to believe that this is a
[26:48] subject that
[26:50] can and should be explored by mainstream
[26:53] science in a way that mainstream science
[26:56] has not to this point perhaps, but I I
[26:59] see signs that it is increasingly
[27:01] engaging in
[27:04] the study of consciousness and a
[27:06] recognition perhaps
[27:08] that consciousness is primary and matter
[27:11] secondary.
[27:13] But, you know, we're not there yet
[27:14] obviously, but I I I feel that there are
[27:16] encouraging signs that the flip may be
[27:20] on its way.
[27:21] >> Let's go back to the UFO sightings
[27:23] reported by the military. Did you in
[27:27] probing those experiences
[27:29] discover numerous qualities there?
[27:33] >> If I can take this back to the report
[27:35] that was commissioned on UFOs by the
[27:38] United States Congress
[27:39] and which appeared
[27:42] in June 2021
[27:45] on the phenomenon. This was delivered by
[27:48] the defense and intelligence community
[27:50] to Congress
[27:52] um as a sort of you know, here's what we
[27:55] know about UFOs or UAP to give them
[27:59] their kind of kosher acronym
[28:01] unidentified aerial phenomena.
[28:06] Many people were disappointed by this
[28:08] report because they said it didn't go
[28:10] far enough to explain what the US
[28:14] defense and intelligence communities
[28:15] knew about UFOs. I happen to think it
[28:18] was a a real breakthrough because it was
[28:20] a real acknowledgement that there is a
[28:21] phenomenon here that needs to be taken
[28:24] seriously.
[28:26] Um
[28:27] in amongst the sort of the the data in a
[28:30] very slimmed down, I think it's a seven
[28:32] page unclassified version of the report.
[28:35] It it it pays heed to a small section of
[28:40] sightings that totally defies
[28:42] explanation.
[28:44] Now, that is the portion that everyone
[28:46] is interested in. It's you know, it's
[28:48] not the bit that you can um um
[28:51] uh
[28:51] possibly uh
[28:53] analyze and dismiss as
[28:56] top secret technology that may be
[28:58] developed by the Russians or the Chinese
[29:00] or whatever. I mean, what people really
[29:02] want to know about is that
[29:04] subset of data that really defies
[29:07] explanation.
[29:08] And with that subset, there is no doubt
[29:12] that
[29:13] uh
[29:13] there are there there there are a range
[29:16] of strange phenomena that accompany the
[29:19] UFO itself.
[29:21] And I think it's because that range of
[29:24] phenomena is so strange, you know, um
[29:28] the researcher Jacques Vallée, whose
[29:30] work is I think exemplary in
[29:34] um detailing what that the just the sort
[29:37] of the strangeness of that phenomena, uh
[29:39] something in fact he dubbed high
[29:40] strangeness,
[29:42] um because that phenomena is so
[29:45] off-putting to people who just want to
[29:48] come up with an answer to the technology
[29:51] of UFOs,
[29:53] they have dismissed it.
[29:55] And they've only analyzed the UFO as a
[29:58] nuts-and-bolts phenomenon itself. And I
[30:01] think that's wrong. I I think because
[30:03] you know, as Jacques Vallée and others
[30:05] have have documented,
[30:07] unfortunately for those who want to um
[30:11] sort of analyze this rationally and
[30:13] critically, uh
[30:15] it it is accompanied by this uh
[30:18] stuff that defies an explanation. And
[30:21] that's very off-putting to people who
[30:24] want to be taken seriously on UFOs as a
[30:28] well, as perhaps
[30:30] you know, the defense and intelligence
[30:31] communities would want to analyze it in
[30:33] the same way that they would analyze a
[30:36] threat
[30:37] from a threat nation.
[30:39] Um
[30:40] and it can't be done like that,
[30:42] unfortunately.
[30:43] >> Can you give an example of high
[30:45] strangeness?
[30:47] >> Well, okay.
[30:48] Uh I'm trying to think of a specific
[30:52] uh UFO case example. I mean, there are
[30:54] so many of them.
[30:55] >> One that was included in the government
[30:57] report?
[30:58] >> Well, the the the the government report
[31:00] in the unclassified version was so
[31:03] watered down that it it all it talked
[31:06] about was a handful of sightings since
[31:11] 2004
[31:13] that it had looked at.
[31:15] Um and of course, as
[31:18] anyone who's ever done any research in
[31:20] the field knows, um the phenomenon, the
[31:24] UFO phenomenon, owes its existence, I
[31:27] mean, it goes way back, but certainly in
[31:29] the modern era, you could say that it's
[31:31] been charted since 1947.
[31:35] >> Mhm.
[31:36] >> When the you know, the the the Kenneth
[31:38] Arnold first sighted what he described
[31:41] as
[31:42] flying objects that looked like saucers
[31:44] skipping over the surface of a pond,
[31:46] which gave rise to the
[31:48] uh the the the the description flying
[31:50] saucer.
[31:51] Um
[31:52] so, since that era, there have been so
[31:55] many sightings. But in the report that
[31:58] was given to Congress,
[32:00] the intelligence community and the
[32:02] defense community said, "We're only
[32:03] going to look back to 2000 to 2004 and
[32:08] analyze data since 2004."
[32:11] Sort of suggesting that that was the
[32:13] only data that was worth looking at.
[32:17] But actually, what that managed to do
[32:20] was obscure the long trail of sightings
[32:24] history going back to 1947, in which
[32:27] there is so much good data, including
[32:31] some pretty scary stuff, ostensibly,
[32:34] which is about how UFOs have
[32:38] consistently
[32:40] interfered with the nuclear deterrent.
[32:44] Um
[32:45] which uh
[32:47] is extremely well documented and has
[32:49] been for a very long time.
[32:51] Um and I suspect probably that is why it
[32:54] has been left out because you do not
[32:57] want to acknowledge, if you are in
[33:00] charge of the nation any national
[33:01] defense, that there are things in your
[33:04] sky which defy rational explanation
[33:08] at least
[33:09] uh explanation uh to your rational mind.
[33:13] >> It seems that nuts and bolts machines,
[33:15] let's say that come from another world
[33:17] somewhere, might well be interested in
[33:20] our nuclear developments here.
[33:23] >> Indeed. And I think that that is a sort
[33:26] of part of this all in that
[33:29] that is one way of looking at it, that
[33:30] you have to, if you are charged with
[33:34] um analysis of something that is
[33:37] appearing in your sky which you can't
[33:39] explain, you have to consider, if this
[33:42] is your job, that it may be a threat. Um
[33:46] on the other hand though, of course, it
[33:48] might not be. If if it is truly esoteric
[33:51] in nature, it may be bound up in all
[33:54] sorts of other things in including, you
[33:56] know,
[33:57] going back to that discussion
[33:59] we were having earlier about, you know,
[34:02] this perceptual interface. If um
[34:06] if if if I am
[34:10] perceiving things in a space that is
[34:12] governed by an aspect of consciousness
[34:15] that is not well understood, it is
[34:17] entirely possible that these things, you
[34:20] know, whether they are
[34:22] ghosts
[34:23] uh uh or
[34:25] UFOs are appearing on this interface, my
[34:28] perceptual interface,
[34:30] um
[34:31] as some manifestation of
[34:35] um, say perhaps, you know, Jung's
[34:37] collective unconscious. Uh, I mean, Jung
[34:40] himself was very interested in the UFO
[34:42] phenomenon and felt that it was both
[34:45] sort of precognitive and reflective in
[34:47] some way, you know, some perhaps some
[34:50] aspect of of
[34:53] of our group mind that is reflected in
[34:56] the way that we perceive things.
[34:58] Um, so
[35:00] yes, there is a nuts and bolts aspect to
[35:02] it, but at the same time, that doesn't
[35:04] explain every aspect of of it, either.
[35:07] >> Speaking personally, I have lots of data
[35:10] that I think would link UFO phenomena to
[35:13] life after death, but I'm just curious
[35:16] as to what data might have been revealed
[35:19] by the US government along these lines.
[35:22] >> I don't think the US government has
[35:24] revealed any data that connects the UFO
[35:27] phenomenon
[35:29] to other aspects of, you know,
[35:32] paranormality or the
[35:35] or consciousness,
[35:37] precisely for that reason. And I think
[35:40] it is because it is, along with everyone
[35:43] else, it is struggling to make uh, those
[35:46] kinds of connections. And were it to
[35:49] make those connections,
[35:52] I think that in their minds, there would
[35:55] be ridicule attached to it, you know,
[35:57] cuz you're starting to veer away from
[36:01] something which has a sort of defense
[36:03] aspect to it, which is nuts and bolts,
[36:05] into this esoteric realm, wherein you
[36:08] make yourself open to criticism that you
[36:11] are, you know, you've quotes lost the
[36:13] plot. You're you're veering into the
[36:15] subject
[36:16] but is, you know, more, uh,
[36:19] commonly explored by religion or
[36:21] philosophy or, you know, and that's not
[36:23] the role of defense or the intelligence
[36:26] community, they would say, and and I
[36:29] think that is why
[36:31] to a lack of progress has been made in
[36:35] the analysis and examination
[36:38] by {quotes} defense-type people of this
[36:42] phenomenon. It's because they're they're
[36:44] looking at it through a very narrow
[36:46] aperture, which is the nuts and bolts
[36:48] aspect of it.
[36:50] >> Do you think they are hiding
[36:51] information?
[36:52] >> Well, inevitably
[36:55] if a government
[36:57] is is analyzing something that it
[36:59] doesn't understand it is going to hide
[37:01] stuff because it doesn't want to display
[37:03] its own ignorance. Um, that exposes a
[37:06] vulnerability uh, in a nation's security
[37:10] or in
[37:11] anyone's security.
[37:13] Um, that is that that's that's a very
[37:15] uncomfortable place to be in if you are
[37:17] charged with national security. So, uh,
[37:21] yes, there is a great deal of secrecy
[37:24] uh, surrounding the subject, but I don't
[37:26] think it's
[37:27] all to do with, you know, what many
[37:30] people believe, which is that
[37:32] it's because, you know, the government
[37:34] is hiding away crashed extraterrestrial
[37:37] craft or because it's got aliens in
[37:39] freezers. I think a lot of it is just to
[37:42] hide its own ignorance, actually.
[37:45] >> I don't know if you're familiar with a
[37:46] book I wrote over 20 years ago around
[37:49] the same time you were working on the
[37:51] hunt for zero point energy, which
[37:54] undoubtedly takes you back to Hal
[37:56] Puthoff's research.
[37:58] I met Hal Puthoff myself in 1976
[38:02] and he dumped a big file into my lap. He
[38:05] said, "Please take it off of my hands.
[38:08] We don't want it here at SRI. It's too
[38:10] controversial."
[38:12] A man who called himself the PK man. He
[38:16] could produce UFO sightings at will and
[38:19] did so.
[38:20] >> And and who was the PK man?
[38:22] >> His name was Ted Owens.
[38:25] >> No, I don't know about that. I I if I
[38:28] Well, I will get the name of your book
[38:30] that book off you after this cuz I'd
[38:31] love to read it. Um yes, I did obviously
[38:35] I I I I know Hal Puthoff. I've met him
[38:38] quite a few times and we've talked about
[38:40] well, predominantly about the zero point
[38:43] energy aspect of his research. Uh
[38:46] we've spoken less about the remote
[38:48] viewing side of his um career. Uh
[38:52] but um
[38:55] in all the realms that he's been
[38:56] involved in,
[38:57] uh yes, there there there are some very
[38:59] interesting things. I I would love to
[39:01] read that.
[39:02] >> If I may, let me share with you one
[39:04] story because I think it is on point. It
[39:07] is the example that you would need to
[39:09] make this connection clear, I think.
[39:12] He, when I first met him, he had a stack
[39:14] of papers this high
[39:17] >> [laughter]
[39:17] >> of demonstrations he had produced. And I
[39:20] noticed several instances in which he
[39:22] said, "I'm going to produce a UFO and
[39:25] you will see it within a certain time
[39:27] and space parameters."
[39:29] And that happened.
[39:31] They were reported in newspapers. And
[39:33] so, I asked him, "Can you do that for
[39:36] me?" It was back in 1976.
[39:40] I had all of Hal Puthoff's files at that
[39:43] point. He was so glad to get it out of
[39:45] his office. I was a graduate student
[39:48] then and just beginning my explorations
[39:51] in parapsychology.
[39:53] So, Ted Owens said, "Yes, I can create
[39:56] three UFO sightings
[39:59] that will occur within a 90-day window
[40:01] within 100 miles of San Francisco."
[40:05] And at one point, he called me up in the
[40:07] middle of this experiment. He was very
[40:10] excited and he said, "Jeffrey, I can
[40:12] feel it coming. This is going to be big.
[40:15] This is going to be a sighting that will
[40:18] be seen by hundreds of people. It will
[40:21] be photographed and a picture will be
[40:23] published on the front page of one of
[40:26] your local newspapers. And three days
[40:30] later, that is exactly what happened.
[40:34] >> Wow. Well, I would have to see that. I
[40:36] I'm I'm not aware of that. I'm
[40:38] particularly interested, of course, if
[40:41] Hal handed that data off to you, and I'd
[40:45] love to read about it because that
[40:46] sounds fascinating. And
[40:49] this So, that, Jeff, is what you're
[40:52] saying is an example of a crossover
[40:54] between the UFO phenomenon and mind.
[40:57] >> Yes.
[40:58] >> How we are able to
[41:00] either project it or reflect it or
[41:04] And I agree, there is that crossover.
[41:06] And it's
[41:08] it's taken on a new form now in
[41:10] something which I'm sure you're aware of
[41:12] called CE5, Close Encounters of the
[41:15] Fifth Kind, wherein experiences invite
[41:19] contact with the phenomenon.
[41:21] I'm not altogether sure it's a good
[41:23] idea, by the way, in all cases, but
[41:25] anyway, that's what they do. And this
[41:28] often elicits encounters with orbs and
[41:32] UFO-like phenomena,
[41:34] uh wherein the phenomenon appears to
[41:37] these experiences when they call for it.
[41:41] So, it is clearly to my mind, and
[41:44] because that is very well documented, by
[41:46] the way, by the way, it's not, you know,
[41:47] often solo experiences who are calling
[41:51] these things down, but you know, they
[41:53] are witnessed by
[41:54] multiple people,
[41:56] that
[41:57] that is that is the crossover. That is
[42:01] another example of how these two
[42:04] apparently separate fields interact. And
[42:08] that's the space that I want to look at
[42:11] next.
[42:12] >> I'll give you another example. It
[42:14] relates even more directly to the
[42:16] question of survival. Ten Owens, a very
[42:19] interesting man, I've written a book
[42:21] about him called The PK Man. It hasn't
[42:24] sold a lot of copies yet, but I do keep
[42:27] talking about it.
[42:28] >> It's going to get one more sale now.
[42:30] >> [laughter]
[42:31] >> He died in 1987.
[42:33] He was living at the time in Fort Ann,
[42:36] New York. A tiny little town. And he was
[42:40] living in a farmhouse outside of town.
[42:42] He said that he had received messages
[42:45] from the UFOs
[42:47] to rendezvous with him there.
[42:49] He produced in my research with him 168
[42:54] demonstrations of psychokinetic
[42:56] phenomena that he claimed were mediated
[42:59] by his contact with he he called them
[43:02] the space intelligences, hyperspace
[43:05] entities who hovered above the earth in
[43:08] an invisible UFO. And he claimed that
[43:11] they had directed him to Fort Ann, New
[43:14] York. That's where he died,
[43:16] incidentally, of sclerosis of the liver.
[43:19] He drank a lot.
[43:20] He was fact he was a very heavy drinker.
[43:23] He seemed to produce a lot of
[43:25] psychokinetic phenomena while
[43:27] enibriated.
[43:29] But before he died, he sent me a number
[43:31] of newspaper clippings showing UFOs
[43:35] appearing around Fort Ann, New York, and
[43:37] also a letter of testimony from his
[43:41] neighbor who claimed that UFOs were
[43:44] hovering right above his farmhouse.
[43:48] And he died shortly thereafter.
[43:51] >> Time and again, you hear this kind of
[43:55] story. And it it it you know, it becomes
[43:57] important.
[43:59] It certainly has become important to me
[44:01] when I've, you know,
[44:03] I've got it from sources that I trust.
[44:05] You know, we we talked at the beginning
[44:06] of all of this about
[44:08] the importance of of of getting [snorts]
[44:10] information at least to begin with when
[44:12] you're exploring this subject from
[44:14] sources that you trust. In my case, it
[44:16] was from my father and from my wife. But
[44:18] in my work as a
[44:22] senior [snorts] editor at Jane's Defense
[44:24] Weekly, you know, I was introduced to
[44:27] for example, not only Hal Puthoff, but
[44:30] Ingo Swann.
[44:32] And Ingo was, you know, if you like, uh
[44:36] one of the other
[44:38] godfathers or fathers of remote viewing
[44:40] alongside Hal.
[44:42] Uh and
[44:43] I had a chance, several chances in fact,
[44:45] to talk to him about his work, which as
[44:48] you know, many people know, was funded
[44:49] by the government for a long time. Um
[44:53] Yeah, and and as a defense journalist
[44:56] myself, I looked for patterns. I In
[44:58] fact, I followed the Woodward and
[45:00] Bernstein mantra of follow the money a
[45:02] lot. And when you've got 15 and plus
[45:05] years of constant funding by the defense
[45:09] and intelligence community into a thing,
[45:11] in this case remote viewing, you know,
[45:13] that's when I sort of sit up and take
[45:15] notice.
[45:16] So,
[45:17] through Hal and through Ingo,
[45:21] uh and actually even through Uri Geller,
[45:24] who I've also met, um who again, he
[45:28] invited me to his home after he'd read
[45:30] The Hunt for Zero Point, and he did the
[45:33] spoon bending thing for me. You know,
[45:36] Uri was again, he was also funded by the
[45:38] CIA to
[45:40] do things. SRI, Stanford Research
[45:43] Institute,
[45:45] analyzed his work. Hal was involved in
[45:47] that. So, you know, these things
[45:50] they all have a very solid
[45:53] uh
[45:54] base to them for me. Um
[45:57] but that's just that's the foundational
[45:59] stuff. You know, I I think if we're
[46:02] going to make progress going forward, we
[46:04] need to look I think it's probably Hal
[46:07] Puthoff who describes it as the frontier
[46:09] of the frontier.
[46:11] And and
[46:13] those that will entail exploring aspects
[46:16] of
[46:17] of consciousness which will be deeply
[46:20] uncomfortable to some areas of science
[46:23] because it will exhibit
[46:27] high strangeness of the kind talked
[46:29] about by Jacques Vallée.
[46:31] >> It seems as if at least
[46:33] since maybe the early 1950s, there was
[46:36] an official policy of the government to
[46:38] try and debunk these high strangeness
[46:41] reports in order to avoid public panic.
[46:44] >> Definitely. And and you know, that has
[46:46] been a part of my work as well. I mean,
[46:48] coming out of
[46:50] the defense journalism realm,
[46:53] you know, you do become acutely aware
[46:56] that not all the information that you
[46:58] get is necessarily the truth or correct.
[47:04] You have to employ a very rigorous
[47:07] filter to try and work out what is truth
[47:10] and what isn't, particularly when you're
[47:12] dealing with
[47:13] aspects of national security.
[47:15] So, yes, the whole UFO field has been
[47:18] ridden with disinformation and as is
[47:21] well documented
[47:23] in the 1950s
[47:25] and 1960s when
[47:28] the CIA amongst others was behind a
[47:30] range of new technology that was
[47:32] appearing in the skies such as the U-2
[47:34] spy plane
[47:36] and the very fast flying A-12 hypersonic
[47:40] aircraft. That
[47:44] that that meant that well, they were
[47:47] aware that the UFO phenomenon was
[47:50] something you could hide this technology
[47:52] behind. And if you mixed up Um, little
[47:56] bit of truth
[47:59] with a whole range of disinformation.
[48:03] You know, you could get some of that
[48:04] stuff to stick and it was a very useful
[48:07] curtain behind which you could
[48:10] hide real secrets and a real technology.
[48:13] So, yeah, you
[48:14] you have to be aware of all of this
[48:16] stuff and I I I think in a way
[48:18] that
[48:20] consciousness itself being a somewhat of
[48:24] being a a highly malleable thing um
[48:27] is
[48:29] prone to um
[48:31] you know, when when you feed all of this
[48:33] disinformation into this interface that
[48:36] you know, I've been trying to
[48:39] um describe and trying to find the words
[48:42] to describe it in my Bigelow essay as
[48:44] well.
[48:45] Um
[48:46] that interface becomes in a sense bent
[48:49] out of shape itself by a range of
[48:54] different inputs. One of those inputs
[48:56] being the human input which is
[48:58] characterized in this case by
[49:01] uh misinformation and disinformation
[49:03] from intelligence communities.
[49:05] >> Nick, where do you think things are
[49:07] going from here? Do you have any sense
[49:10] of the future of this investigation?
[49:14] >> You know, in my own field um
[49:17] so, you know, coming out of that
[49:19] aerospace and defense background
[49:22] um
[49:23] recognizing that
[49:25] huge breakthrough has been made in in
[49:27] the middle of 2021 with this UAP study
[49:31] that was um
[49:33] delivered to Congress by the office of
[49:35] uh
[49:36] uh
[49:38] the defense and intelligence community.
[49:41] that
[49:42] um
[49:43] people are going to sit up and take
[49:44] notice. Sadly,
[49:46] in the defense and intelligence realm,
[49:48] this is now going to be a thing.
[49:51] I regret to have to say that I think
[49:54] there will probably be some form of race
[49:58] to
[49:59] uncover some of the darker aspects of
[50:02] this amongst the great rival block
[50:07] powers. So,
[50:10] China, Russia,
[50:12] the United States,
[50:14] my own country, the UK, and I think
[50:17] others will be racing to try to
[50:19] understand what all of this means. And
[50:22] sadly again, I think there will be a
[50:25] >> [snorts]
[50:26] >> a
[50:27] >> [laughter]
[50:29] >> a prism, a lens that they are going to
[50:31] look through, which is going to see this
[50:34] in terms of
[50:35] weapons technology
[50:37] and advances to be made in the field of
[50:41] intelligence gathering and what have
[50:44] you. I mean, we've
[50:45] we've seen this in the past, of course,
[50:47] with remote viewing.
[50:48] Remote viewing
[50:50] came out of,
[50:52] extraordinary to to acknowledge in in
[50:55] many ways, a race between the Soviet
[50:58] Union as it was then and the United
[51:00] States to gain a sort of psychic upper
[51:04] hand
[51:05] uh
[51:06] between themselves.
[51:07] Um
[51:09] I'm a little fearful that that race now,
[51:12] triggered by this whole new UFO thing,
[51:15] might
[51:17] be a race to acquire technology
[51:20] that would replicate sort of UFO, UAP
[51:24] type uh
[51:27] platforms is the sort of the uh
[51:30] vernacular in in the defense world. Um
[51:34] I think that
[51:37] that is why it's going to be incredibly
[51:39] important for science to get engaged in
[51:41] this.
[51:42] All of science, not just defense
[51:44] science.
[51:46] Um
[51:46] this is a phenomenon that deserves to be
[51:49] understood and it deserves to be made as
[51:52] transparent as possible
[51:54] because I think the last thing that any
[51:56] of us
[51:57] wants is to see a sort of new
[52:00] I don't know what you'd even call it, a
[52:02] sort of esoteric arms race in this area.
[52:06] That is not what it it is about. I
[52:08] think, you know, my own explorations of
[52:10] this subject and perhaps dare I say it,
[52:14] your own too, Jeff. Uh, it certainly
[52:19] shown me that this is a
[52:23] subject that is it is
[52:26] uh, it is not to be suborned by any
[52:30] particular
[52:31] interest groups. You know, consciousness
[52:33] is something that, uh,
[52:38] >> [laughter]
[52:39] >> we need to explore this subject for the
[52:41] greater good.
[52:43] Uh, and I think the greater good of
[52:44] humanity and that is really only going
[52:46] to come through,
[52:47] um,
[52:48] uh, transparency and the whole of
[52:51] science engaging in this because it is
[52:55] so,
[52:56] um, elusive that only by a whole whole
[53:01] of science approach to our trying to
[53:04] understand it, are we going to make any
[53:06] progress in,
[53:07] you know, chipping away at it.
[53:08] >> I have a hypothesis I'd like to share
[53:11] with you. I think the universe itself is
[53:14] conscious.
[53:15] >> Of course, me too.
[53:16] >> And when you, for example, put out the
[53:19] intention that you wanted to meet with
[53:21] the world leaders of consciousness
[53:23] research and then out of the blue you
[53:25] got a two-year grant to do exactly that,
[53:29] I think it was the universe responding
[53:31] to your intention.
[53:33] >> Well, thank you. I I and that is the
[53:35] way, um,
[53:37] funnily enough, I see it as well.
[53:39] Uh,
[53:39] I read uh, and enjoyed hugely in your
[53:44] own Big Ideas essay, the discussion
[53:45] about uh metaphysical realism. Uh the
[53:49] idea that the universe itself is
[53:51] conscious uh
[53:53] and responsive and alive. I have prodded
[53:56] it enough, I hope in a nice way,
[54:00] um but I to know that that is true. You
[54:03] put the intention out there and if the
[54:06] intent intention, I think, aligns with I
[54:09] don't know. Um and I
[54:11] For simplicity's sake, let's call it a
[54:13] greater good. Uh that
[54:16] the universe will respond in that sense.
[54:19] Consciousness will respond. And
[54:24] of course that is
[54:26] unexplained.
[54:27] That is so mysterious that it it can do
[54:31] that.
[54:32] But yet
[54:34] you know, there are enough instances of
[54:36] it. Um
[54:37] In your case, in my case, we all know
[54:40] people who have done that and the
[54:42] universe has in some way responded. Um
[54:45] you know, let's
[54:47] let's test that.
[54:49] Uh in a more widespread way and say,
[54:52] "Look, if you know, uh whole communities
[54:55] can put out that intention. Um I mean,
[54:58] we are at a perilous point in um
[55:02] you know, humanity's evolution. Uh we're
[55:04] faced with
[55:06] existential threats like climate change.
[55:09] Um you know, we seem to have regressed,
[55:11] unfortunately, in a sort of national
[55:12] security setting um to a kind of
[55:15] something that equates to a uh
[55:17] kind of Cold War mentality. Um
[55:21] so, the more that this sort of intention
[55:25] can be put out there to um
[55:29] explore consciousness in a positive way,
[55:31] you know, I think, hopefully, the more
[55:33] the universe will respond uh
[55:37] in a positive way back. So, anyway,
[55:39] that's my hope and, uh, uh, uh,
[55:42] dream for the future.
[55:43] >> Well, Nick Cook, this has been a
[55:46] delightful conversation. It's very
[55:48] exciting for me to have it with someone
[55:51] with your background in the aerospace
[55:53] and defense industries and technology.
[55:56] It adds a whole new layer for me, and I
[55:59] think for the viewers of New Thinking
[56:01] Allowed. Thank you so much for being
[56:04] with me.
[56:05] >> Thank you for having me on.
[56:07] >> And for those of you listening or
[56:09] watching, thank you for being with us.
[56:14] >> [music]
[56:22] [music]
[56:28] [music]
[56:33] [music]
[56:35] >> New Thinking Allowed is presented by the
[56:37] California Institute for Human Science,
[56:40] a fully accredited university offering
[56:43] distance learning graduate degrees that
[56:45] focus on mind, body, and spirit. The
[56:49] topics that we cover here. We are
[56:51] particularly excited to announce new
[56:53] degrees emphasizing parapsychology
[56:57] and the paranormal. Visit their website
[56:59] at cihs.edu.
[57:03] >> The New Thinking Allowed magazine issue
[57:06] 10 on UFOs and UAP is now ready for free
[57:10] download, and you can also order
[57:12] beautiful printed copies. Go to
[57:15] newthinkingallowed.org.
[57:18] >> Book four in the New Thinking Allowed
[57:20] dialogue series is Charles T. Tart, 70
[57:25] years of exploring consciousness and
[57:28] parapsychology,
[57:30] now available on Amazon.
[57:33] >> For early access to our videos and live
[57:37] stream events, sign up for our free
[57:40] weekly newsletter at
[57:42] newthinkingaloud.org.