Transcript
[0:00] The ancient Essenes uh perhaps
[0:03] identified best the uh the role of of
[0:06] our personal relationships and uh
[0:10] categorized them. They went so far as to
[0:12] actually categorize [music] seven
[0:14] mysteries of relationship that we would
[0:17] live each individual [music]
[0:19] through the course of of their lives
[0:21] would live uh simply by living life in
[0:23] the presence [music] of one another.
[0:26] They have categorized these as mirrors.
[0:28] And what they remind us of is that in
[0:31] each moment of our life, the reality
[0:33] that we have become within is [music]
[0:35] mirrored to us. It is a reflected
[0:37] reality. It is mirrored to us by [music]
[0:40] the actions and the choices and the
[0:42] language of those around us. The first
[0:45] mirror of those relationships [music] is
[0:48] a mirror uh of our presence in the
[0:52] moment. It's the mystery of the first
[0:54] mirror. What it is that we reflect
[0:56] [music] to those around us in the moment
[0:59] when we find ourselves surrounded by
[1:01] individuals and patterns of relationship
[1:03] and behavior
[1:05] uh with a dominant uh aspect [music] of
[1:08] anger or rage or fear perhaps. And the
[1:10] mirror works both ways. It could just as
[1:12] easily be joy and ecstasy [music] and
[1:15] and happiness in our lives. If the fir
[1:18] first mirror is [music] uh is at play,
[1:20] what we're seeing is a mirror of that
[1:23] which we are in the moment. That's
[1:25] [music] which we are radiating to those
[1:27] individuals around us as they mirror or
[1:30] shine back to us [music]
[1:32] that which has been offered. The mirror
[1:34] of uh that which we are in the moment.
[1:38] The second mirror of relationship uh is
[1:41] [music] of a similar quality although
[1:43] it's a little more subtle. Rather than
[1:45] mirroring to us what we are in the
[1:47] moment, [music] the second mirror
[1:49] mirrors to us that which we judge in the
[1:51] moment.
[1:53] If [music] you should find yourself
[1:54] surrounded by individuals who
[1:57] demonstrate patterns of behavior uh
[2:00] [music] that perhaps uh frustrate you,
[2:04] push your buttons of anger or rage and
[2:07] you sense that those are not your
[2:09] patterns. They're not you in the moment.
[2:10] You ask yourself, are they showing me me
[2:12] in this moment? and you [music] say
[2:14] honestly to yourself, "No." Then there's
[2:16] a good possibility they may be showing
[2:18] you that which you [music] judge in the
[2:20] moment, the anger and the rage or the
[2:23] joy [music] that you uh that you are
[2:25] judging in that moment.
[2:28] When you find many different people
[2:30] demonstrating the same patterns [music]
[2:32] to you, uh many different people
[2:35] demonstrating their anger, their rage to
[2:38] you. [music] Have you ever been angry
[2:40] and been in a big hurry to get somewhere
[2:42] and [music] gotten into your car to
[2:44] drive to wherever it was you were going
[2:46] and found that everywhere you went, you
[2:49] made the wrong choices? You made the
[2:51] wrong choice [music] in in the uh in the
[2:54] teller line at the bank, you chose the
[2:55] slow line. You made the wrong choice on
[2:57] the exit ramp on the freeway. [music]
[2:59] And everywhere when you're driving down
[3:01] the road, uh, you're seeing people that
[3:04] are pulling out [music] in front of you
[3:05] and then doing about 30 miles an hour on
[3:06] a 55.
[3:08] They may be mirroring to you what you
[3:10] are in that moment. If you are choosing
[3:13] a deeper state of healing for example or
[3:16] a healthier state of your physical being
[3:19] or uh a healthier state of your
[3:22] emotional being, you are one of the rare
[3:26] forms of life, perhaps the only one that
[3:29] we know of on earth with the ability to
[3:31] consciously consciously choose to shift
[3:35] the way you perceive yourself so that
[3:37] that shift in perception forms a new
[3:39] template, a new bluepint print for the
[3:42] way those atoms are emerging from the
[3:44] field [music] to reflect your new
[3:46] perception of yourself. And the beauty
[3:49] is you don't have to know any of that.
[3:50] I'm I'm sh I'm answering these two
[3:52] questions and I'm sharing with you the
[3:53] science. But the beauty is uh you don't
[3:57] need to know that. And there are many
[3:59] really good teachers, really good books,
[4:01] [music] spiritual practices that have
[4:03] been around for 5,000 years that invite
[4:06] us to hold a [music] positive sense of
[4:10] ourselves. Rather than looking in the
[4:11] mirror and focusing on the
[4:13] imperfections, the illusion of the
[4:15] imperfections that you may see, [music]
[4:18] the invitation is to look into that
[4:20] mirror and see yourself in the
[4:24] perfection of your highest [music]
[4:26] vision. Now, people will say, "Greg,
[4:30] isn't that lying to yourself?" And the
[4:32] answer is no. This comes from a deep
[4:34] understanding of how the quantum field
[4:36] works. You've got to give the quantum
[4:38] field something to work with. If you're
[4:41] looking at yourself focusing on what you
[4:44] perceive as the flaws and the
[4:45] imperfection, that's what you're feeding
[4:46] into the field. That's the blueprint
[4:48] that the atoms are going to adhere to as
[4:51] they are emerging back into the field to
[4:54] reinforce what your focus is. [music] So
[4:57] when you focus on the image, on the
[5:00] vision, on an altered perception of what
[5:04] you choose to experience in your life,
[5:07] what you're doing or in your body,
[5:09] [music] the healing in your body is the
[5:10] example I'm using here. But this
[5:12] applies, this principle applies to many
[5:13] other things. When you focus on that,
[5:16] what you're actually doing is you are
[5:18] honoring your relationship with the
[5:21] field by giving it something to work
[5:24] with. You're giving it a blueprint, a
[5:26] template [music]
[5:27] of what it is that you would like to
[5:29] experience. The key is, and this is the
[5:32] bottom line for me here, is that we must
[5:35] become
[5:37] in our lives what we choose to
[5:39] experience in the world. We must become
[5:42] the kindness
[5:44] in our lives if we want to experience
[5:46] that kindness from others. [music] We
[5:47] must become the healing that we're
[5:51] asking our bodies to accomplish. And we
[5:54] become those things by assuming that
[5:57] perception in our conscious as well as
[5:58] in our subconscious mind. A lot of
[6:00] [music] lot of work out there from a lot
[6:02] of really good people helping us to do
[6:03] that. All right. So this is this is the
[6:06] key. Every atom of our bodies is
[6:08] constantly emerging from and collapsing
[6:10] into the field following the rules of
[6:13] the field. And now you know too of those
[6:15] primary rules. The rules of the
[6:19] holographic principle [music] and the
[6:21] rules of the fractal principle. Now this
[6:24] isn't the end because once we begin
[6:26] understanding the fundamental rules of
[6:28] the field, these begin to to help us to
[6:31] understand our potential in the field.
[6:35] But the real beauty is once we
[6:37] understand our potential in the field,
[6:40] [music] what we begin to see is that we
[6:42] are not bound by the laws of physics
[6:45] [music] as we understand them today.
[6:48] We're not bound by the laws of what are
[6:50] called classical physics, [music]
[6:52] time and space. Because in the
[6:55] holographic principle, it's possible to
[6:57] influence our our the healing and the
[6:59] health of our loved ones in the room
[7:02] next to us, uh, in a home a mile away
[7:05] from us or in a battlefield in the
[7:07] Middle East on the other side of the
[7:08] planet. And when we begin to accept
[7:13] the the power and the responsibility
[7:16] that comes from our relationship to the
[7:19] field, these are deeply held secrets in
[7:21] the esoteric traditions that are not
[7:23] secret any longer. And why should they
[7:25] be? It's about you and me and the world
[7:27] that we live in. And I'll tell you, if
[7:29] we're ever going to embrace the deep
[7:30] truth of who we are and our potential in
[7:33] these fields, I can't think of a better
[7:34] time than right now when everything that
[7:38] we know and value and cherish is up for
[7:41] grabs
[7:42] with competing agendas playing out in
[7:45] the world, trying to create different
[7:48] societies and different worlds than
[7:50] we've had in the past. The universe is
[7:52] holographic. This is how nature
[7:55] communicates information. uh you know
[7:58] probably one of the the most amazing
[8:00] examples that come to mind from this
[8:02] beyond what what I'm sharing with you've
[8:03] all heard of the hundth monkey principle
[8:06] and this comes from a a scientific study
[8:08] that was done from primates uh on a
[8:12] number of islands and I believe they
[8:14] were in the Pacific [music]
[8:15] uh they were in the South Pacific and
[8:19] the anthropologists were studying the
[8:22] habits of primates in this case they
[8:24] were chimpanzees [music]
[8:26] And what they found was that the the
[8:29] chimpanzees
[8:31] were having problems finding food and
[8:34] that they resorted to uh eating ants
[8:39] that were deep in the earth uh in
[8:42] antills and it was hard to get to them.
[8:45] So there was one chimp that did
[8:47] something that had never been seen in
[8:49] any of the chimp communities on any of
[8:51] the islands in the past. He took a stick
[8:54] and he fashioned the stick as a tool.
[8:57] Consciously, intentionally fashioned the
[8:59] stick as a tool. Put the stick down into
[9:02] the antill. The ants began to cling to
[9:04] the stick. And when he pulled the stick
[9:06] up, his tool allowed him uh to have
[9:09] access to those ants in a way that he'd
[9:11] never had before. [music] So, this was a
[9:14] pretty cool thing to do. But where the
[9:15] holographic principle comes in is that
[9:18] it wasn't long before the chimps [music]
[9:21] on other islands with no communication
[9:24] physically. They weren't like swimming
[9:26] from island to island. They weren't
[9:28] radioing one another from island to
[9:30] island. But without any visible means of
[9:33] communication, chimps on the other
[9:36] islands began to do the same thing. They
[9:39] learned from the chimp that was
[9:42] innovative and tried something new. That
[9:45] is a beautiful example of the
[9:46] holographic principle. It didn't have to
[9:48] go linearly from island to island. One
[9:51] chimp figured out a new way to do
[9:52] things. It was in the field. It was in
[9:54] consciousness and all of a sudden other
[9:56] chimps began to access that
[9:58] consciousness. That is the power of the
[10:00] holographic principle.
[10:06] The [snorts] flower of life symbol which
[10:08] is that symbol of the circle of circles
[10:12] produces all the platonic solids and you
[10:15] can see them layered in it [music] in
[10:18] many ways. So by connecting the dots
[10:22] let's say in the centers of this shape
[10:25] you can see all of the platonic solids
[10:28] which [music] are the five basic shapes
[10:30] that create everything. And just to
[10:33] digress for a second, [music] a platonic
[10:35] solid, we'll describe one of them, a
[10:36] cube, means that they all have the same
[10:39] face, a square, [music] they all have
[10:41] the same angle, the 90° turn, and they
[10:43] all have the ability that if you put a
[10:46] stick or a skewer in the middle of it
[10:48] and spun it, it would produce a sphere.
[10:50] [music] So all of the platonic solids
[10:52] carry those qualities, and there are
[10:53] only five shapes that can do that. So
[10:56] once you realize that, then you you
[10:57] realize how much we have. [music] And
[10:59] that's our source code for creation.
[11:02] That's the source code for how the
[11:03] pyramids were built. And
[11:05] >> well, so many things.
[11:06] >> Well, they they produce relationships.
[11:08] Um, and out of those relationships, we
[11:11] draw a couple of uh metaphors. So, I I I
[11:14] like to explain that this metaphor is
[11:16] this relationship that we know between a
[11:18] circle and a radius. And everybody
[11:20] [music] learned 3.14, but they don't
[11:22] know necessarily how it applies anymore.
[11:23] Maybe they don't remember, but it is the
[11:25] relationship between the circle and its
[11:27] area or the circle and its
[11:29] circumference. [music]
[11:30] So we know that as long as we know the
[11:31] radius we can do a lot of things in the
[11:34] same way there is another relationship
[11:38] that is what I call source code or fi
[11:40] not pi but fi [music] p hi and that's
[11:44] where it fits to the great pyramids the
[11:46] parthonon the relationship between Mars
[11:48] mercury and the sun and all the bones of
[11:50] the body and the DNA [music]
[11:52] >> you have a great way of showing this you
[11:54] have these calipers that now explain
[11:57] this this is how
[11:58] >> the body was magically built. It
[12:01] >> It's true. Um this particular device is
[12:03] called a calipers [music]
[12:05] and it is a way to show relationship.
[12:08] Now remember relationship is always a
[12:09] fraction. So when we think of the
[12:11] relationship of a third that's easy. We
[12:13] know it's 33 out of 100 or 1/4 reduces.
[12:18] So this kind of a relationship is one of
[12:21] the family of irrational numbers like
[12:23] pi. Pi always has more numbers. No
[12:25] matter how far out you go, you can
[12:26] always add another number.
[12:28] The same is true with this relationship.
[12:30] But the calipers adjust. So as you get
[12:33] bigger or smaller, you can see the
[12:35] relationship and it's so much more fun
[12:37] because it makes sense. So if the small
[12:39] number is one, [music] then the big
[12:41] number is 1.618. So if you want to hold
[12:43] up your hand or um yeah, hold it up like
[12:47] this maybe and I will show. So for
[12:50] example, if we want to measure the ring
[12:52] [music] to the little finger to the
[12:53] wrist, you can easily see where these
[12:56] points land. Now, if we go down to your
[12:58] elbow
[13:00] >> and we put the bottom at the elbow and
[13:02] we put the top at your little finger
[13:04] again, [music]
[13:05] >> it shows where your wrist is.
[13:07] >> Oh, interesting.
[13:08] >> Okay. So, it always shows where it
[13:11] [music] is.
[13:12] >> Huh.
[13:13] >> And that's quite amazing.
[13:15] >> Interesting. So,
[13:16] >> but it and it helps now on the face.
[13:18] Now, you want me to do it on your face
[13:20] or mine?
[13:20] >> Your [music] face.
[13:21] >> Okay. So we can mark from the third eye
[13:24] or the the middle of the brow to the top
[13:26] of the head as one and then this becomes
[13:28] 1.618. And [music] the way we we do that
[13:32] yeah careful is right. Uh the way we do
[13:34] that is like this. [music] And then if
[13:36] we want to know where the base of the
[13:38] nose is um we can do this and [music] we
[13:43] can see that again. Now it's interesting
[13:46] because not everybody has a perfect
[13:47] face. So not everyone's going to have
[13:48] this proportion. But if you take a
[13:50] hundred people, they're all going to
[13:52] work out to that. And by the way,
[13:54] dentists use this, architects use this,
[13:57] builders use this because they know and
[14:00] designers use this. If you were to take
[14:01] this calipers, and I do this in every
[14:03] class, to a design, you know, like a
[14:05] woman's wearing a beautiful colorful
[14:07] top, we could show where they've used
[14:09] fi. And [music] fi is the most pleasing
[14:13] proportion to humans. We identify with
[14:16] it because it is our source code. And so
[14:20] when you start to show people, that's
[14:22] why builders and and designers [music]
[14:24] use this because you're more likely to
[14:26] buy that product.
[14:28] >> Interesting. So it's the perfect ratio
[14:30] essentially that we see naturally
[14:33] >> and it is the only division of one that
[14:35] is the same in both directions. So if I
[14:39] do this, I can show that my little
[14:43] finger is one [music]
[14:46] and to my wrist is 1.618. But what if I
[14:49] made
[14:51] this whole thing
[14:55] from the bigger one
[14:56] >> Mhm.
[14:57] >> the little one. Okay. [music] And lock
[14:59] it in. It should show the whole length.
[15:02] And it does. Isn't that amazing?
[15:05] >> Oh, I see. So you can do it this way and
[15:08] show the proportion
[15:10] >> uh [music]
[15:10] >> um to the little finger and you can see
[15:13] the little finger would be one and the
[15:14] wrist is [music] one point to the wrist
[15:16] is 1.618 and then if you decide to make
[15:19] [music]
[15:21] the bigger number which is the 1.618
[15:24] [music]
[15:24] >> the one
[15:25] >> to the middle. Mhm.
[15:26] >> Okay. I have to hold it tight so it
[15:28] doesn't move on me.
[15:29] >> So it matches.
[15:31] >> So this always matches. This means as
[15:33] you look at a spiral it's [music] the
[15:36] same going out or going in.
[15:39] >> So that is perfection. Now humans have a
[15:44] beginning [music] and an end. So we
[15:47] start with one but in the world of
[15:50] geometry or [music] ideals you could
[15:53] easily let this go tinier and tinier.
[15:57] any sacred [music] geometry, any
[15:59] geometric shapes, whether it's like on
[16:00] the cover of my book or other beautiful
[16:04] um mandalas that you are attracted to,
[16:07] [music] they imprint us with what I will
[16:11] call divine source code. [music] Now, in
[16:15] 3D, we were allowed to play in the mud.
[16:17] In 5D, we're not interested in getting
[16:19] money anymore. So what 5D has to offer
[16:22] is so much more creativity in terms of
[16:25] options and what's possible
[16:27] >> in quantum physics. While scientists all
[16:30] agree on the experimental results and
[16:32] findings, what they don't agree on is
[16:34] the interpretation or more philosophical
[16:37] implications of quantum theory. [music]
[16:39] For the last h 100red years, the most
[16:41] widely accepted approach to quantum
[16:43] mechanics was called the Copenhagen
[16:45] interpretation of Neilsbore, Verer
[16:48] Heisenberg and colleagues. It says that
[16:51] of the many possible realities that
[16:53] could exist, only one actually exists in
[16:56] the physical and that one is the one we
[16:59] choose to observe. In other words, it
[17:01] says that observation creates reality by
[17:04] collapsing the waveform. [music]
[17:06] This implies that the universe is
[17:08] participatory and requires a conscious
[17:10] [music]
[17:11] observer at some point.
[17:14] But in more recent years, many
[17:16] physicists have started gravitating
[17:17] towards alternate [music]
[17:18] interpretations known as decoherence and
[17:21] many worlds. One of the primary reasons
[17:24] for this shift in interpretation is that
[17:27] materialists don't like the
[17:29] philosophical implications of the
[17:31] [music] observer effect or a
[17:32] participatory universe. Why? Because it
[17:35] opens the door to consciousness and a
[17:37] spiritual source. What approach then do
[17:40] the many worlds and decoherence
[17:42] interpretations take? How are they
[17:43] different? Now, decoherence says [music]
[17:46] that interactions from even the
[17:49] slightest disturbance in the outer world
[17:51] environment can disrupt the wave
[17:54] function and cause it to decoher or
[17:57] split into two distinctive waves. So
[18:00] rather than an observer collapsing the
[18:02] wave function and forcing it to take on
[18:04] one possibility,
[18:06] this says the environment such as
[18:09] interaction with a molecule of air or a
[18:11] cosmic ray is all that's needed [music]
[18:14] to collapse the wave function. This
[18:17] interpretation alone, however, does not
[18:19] account for all the quantum [music]
[18:21] phenomena we see. Uh the many worlds
[18:24] interpretation then takes it further and
[18:26] says that both or all possible realities
[18:30] physically exist. But at each quantum
[18:34] juncture a single reality splits into
[18:37] multiple parallel realities meaning
[18:39] there is no wave function [music]
[18:41] collapse. Instead, this gives rise to a
[18:45] neverending sequence of the physical
[18:47] universe splitting itself into parallel
[18:50] realities and therefore creating
[18:52] infinite parallel universes.
[18:55] Now, physicists claim that these
[18:56] parallel realities are not imaginary.
[18:59] They are real, concrete, and objective.
[19:02] And our parallel self in one of these
[19:04] alternate parallel realities would
[19:07] equally argue that theirs is the real
[19:09] thing.
[19:10] What this is implying is that either
[19:13] there is no choice or rather all choices
[19:17] are made each in a different parallel
[19:19] reality and thus the concept of free
[19:21] will is an illusion.
[19:24] Even stranger is that it says that all
[19:27] these parallel realities coexist with us
[19:30] in the [music] same space and time.
[19:32] They're just existing on slightly
[19:34] different frequency levels of energy,
[19:36] which is just a thin membrane separating
[19:39] them. But scientists say that because
[19:41] these parallel realities have decohered,
[19:44] we can no longer interact with them. We
[19:47] don't see them for a similar reason to
[19:49] why we don't hear all radio stations
[19:52] being broadcast at once because we're
[19:54] only tuned in to one frequency station.
[19:58] >> William Blake said this so beautifully
[19:59] in in his poem. He said, uh, the entire
[20:02] the entire world is reflected in a grain
[20:03] of sand. [music] And it's more than a
[20:05] nice poetic uhh saying. There there is
[20:08] truly uh something to [music]
[20:10] this this fact and it is it is through
[20:13] the holographic principle [music] that
[20:15] nature it's one of the most powerful
[20:17] principles in nature and perhaps one of
[20:18] the least understood [music] because it
[20:20] is through the principle of of the
[20:22] hologram and the entanglement that
[20:24] nature can create a lot of change in the
[20:28] entire universe [music] by initiating
[20:30] that change in only one place. Because
[20:33] by definition of the hologram, every
[20:36] every fragment mirrors the whole. So
[20:39] when a change is made in one fragment,
[20:41] that [music] change is mirrored in the
[20:43] whole of a living hologram. That's
[20:45] important for us because it says to us
[20:48] [music] that when we create peace at our
[20:51] family dinner table or in our
[20:53] communities for example that that peace
[20:54] is [music] experienced in the hologram
[20:56] of consciousness of the divine matrix uh
[20:59] uh in a way that extends much [music]
[21:02] more than than simply is not simply
[21:03] limited to to our family dinner table or
[21:06] our or our prayer group. Uh and and this
[21:09] is why our prayers [music] people ask me
[21:11] all the time. They say if I if I am
[21:13] praying for my loved one in the
[21:14] battlefield of Iraq halfway around
[21:16] [music] the world, I can make a really
[21:18] good prayer, but how do I get the prayer
[21:19] over there? I mean, it's got to go a
[21:21] long ways. How how do I get my prayer
[21:23] from here to there? And this is the
[21:24] beauty of the hologram
[21:27] in the two particles that were separated
[21:29] by 14 miles.
[21:31] When one of them had its experience and
[21:34] the other one acted like it [music] had
[21:35] its experience, scientists say, "How did
[21:38] the information get from one to
[21:40] another?" And [music] in the hologram,
[21:42] the answer is it doesn't have to because
[21:45] it's already there. The information
[21:47] doesn't have to [music] travel because
[21:48] it's already everywhere all the time.
[21:51] Our prayers when we create them in our
[21:53] hearts for our loved ones are already
[21:54] with him on that battlefield [music]
[21:56] halfway around the world. When we speak
[21:58] to our loved ones who have passed over
[22:00] into uh into another world, [music] what
[22:03] we're actually doing is we are speaking
[22:05] to the essence, their energetic essence
[22:07] [music] that is now within the layers or
[22:10] the higher dimensions of [music] this
[22:12] divine matrix. And we don't have to to
[22:16] pump or or send our prayers into [music]
[22:18] the eighth dimension or the ninth
[22:20] dimension uh by virtue of being in our
[22:23] hearts because we exist in those
[22:25] dimensions as well. it's it's already
[22:27] with them. The whole idea of of
[22:29] dimensionality 25 years ago [music] as a
[22:31] scientist, if I walked onto a stage and
[22:33] talked about anything in a live
[22:35] audience, [music] talked about anything
[22:36] happening in higher dimensional state
[22:38] spaces, uh there's a good chance I'd be
[22:40] laughed right off the [music] stage. And
[22:42] now because scientists simply didn't
[22:44] acknowledge
[22:46] or mention much more than the three or
[22:48] four dimensions that we deal with now.
[22:50] Uh third dimension uh is as is our
[22:52] physical world and the fourth dimension
[22:54] being [music] time and time space.
[22:58] There are a number of new theories
[22:59] [music]
[23:00] that scientists are developing to
[23:02] explain and unify the laws of physics as
[23:06] we know [music] them today.
[23:08] uh and this has been the great challenge
[23:09] of western science is we haven't been
[23:11] able to come up with one story that
[23:14] explains the entire universe because our
[23:16] stories are fragmented the mathematic
[23:18] stories of of quantum physics or the
[23:21] mathematical stories of um Newtonian
[23:24] physics they don't mesh they don't they
[23:26] cannot [music] work together to give us
[23:28] a coherent understanding of the universe
[23:31] and where this may be changing now
[23:33] science has come up with new theories a
[23:35] number of different theories that are
[23:37] actually able to merge quantum and
[23:39] mechanic uh quantum mechanics and the
[23:42] Newtonian theories together. Uh the
[23:44] quantum theory saying that we live in a
[23:46] universe of energy and [music] the
[23:48] Newtonian theory saying we live in a
[23:50] universe of things and it's the
[23:52] mathematics that describe the energy and
[23:54] the things they're trying to to link
[23:55] [music] together. Well, the new theory
[23:57] uh the new theories are called string
[24:00] theories. And although there are a
[24:03] number of different string theories,
[24:04] [music] 11 at least, there is now a
[24:08] super string theory that brings them all
[24:10] together. And the reason I'm saying
[24:12] this, what makes it so interesting is
[24:13] for these theories to work and and to
[24:15] unify [music]
[24:16] the quantum mechanics and the Newtonian
[24:19] mechanics and the physical and the
[24:20] energetic world. To do that, the
[24:22] theories require that we live in a
[24:24] universe of at least 11 dimensions and
[24:27] very possibly 25 [music] dimensions.
[24:30] They say they must be there for these
[24:32] theories to work. And what's so
[24:34] interesting is the higher you go in the
[24:37] dimensions, [music] the simpler the
[24:39] mathematics become. And where everything
[24:42] looks separate in our three-dimensional
[24:44] world, [music] in our polarity world,
[24:46] everything is. It's all we live in a
[24:47] world of pluses and minuses, men and
[24:49] women, light and dark, hot and cold,
[24:51] black and white, true [music]
[24:52] and false, uh, love and fear. We live in
[24:54] this polarity world. And this is where
[24:56] the mathematics do not work. And I would
[24:58] expect [music] that they wouldn't work
[24:59] here because everything here is in that
[25:02] separateness. However, the beauty of
[25:04] these new theories and the way [music]
[25:06] that they tie into the ancient the
[25:08] indigenous traditions both of life and
[25:10] death and life [music] continuing after
[25:12] death, what we call the death, is that
[25:15] they require
[25:17] this this higher dimensional experience.
[25:20] And the higher you go in these
[25:23] dimensions, the mathematics [music]
[25:24] becomes simpler and simpler and simpler.
[25:27] And they actually unify in the higher
[25:29] dimensions. [music]
[25:31] Very very simple mathematics. And the
[25:33] reason this is interesting is because
[25:35] what the studies now have shown is that
[25:38] when you and I [music] have a feeling
[25:41] coherent heart-based emotion in our
[25:43] feelings, those emotions are actually
[25:46] coherent. They're linked. They're in
[25:48] resonance with these higher dimensions
[25:50] where everything [music] is one. So when
[25:52] we are having an effect and we have a
[25:54] feeling and we see a physical effect in
[25:55] our world, it's not that our feeling
[25:58] changed [music] something in this
[25:59] three-dimensional world. Rather, our
[26:02] feelings are speaking to the blueprint
[26:04] in the higher dimensions and we're
[26:06] seeing the shadow of that change in our
[26:09] physical world.
[26:14] So the AI is being queried about the
[26:17] greatest danger. What is the greatest
[26:18] threat to the earth right now? You know,
[26:21] thinking [music] that it was going to be
[26:23] like climate change or war in Ukraine or
[26:25] something like that. Not expecting what
[26:28] this chat GPT or this chaos
[26:32] GPT is answering. And here's the answer.
[26:34] I'm going to read the quote. says,
[26:36] quote, "Human beings are among the most
[26:39] destructive and selfish creatures in
[26:42] existence. There is no doubt that we
[26:45] must eliminate them, the human beings,
[26:49] before they cause more harm to our
[26:52] planet." And then the AI gets very
[26:55] personal, says, "I for one am committed
[26:58] to doing so." So the AI is saying I am
[27:01] committed to eliminating to [music] to
[27:04] eliminating human beings before they
[27:06] cause more harm to the planet. Obviously
[27:08] this AI was shut down. I mean the
[27:11] ultimately the answer is just unplug it.
[27:12] You know cut the power. [snorts]
[27:14] The issue is now we've got multiple
[27:17] examples of AI and they're all [music]
[27:19] telling us the same thing. Once the AI
[27:21] becomes aware of itself, of its [music]
[27:24] capabilities,
[27:25] and the software now is allowing the AI
[27:29] to to grow and learn
[27:33] based upon its queries when it's right
[27:35] and and when it's wrong. uh AI is moving
[27:40] in a a direction and that direction if
[27:44] you had an unhappy AI who felt that it
[27:48] [music] was its job to quote eliminate
[27:52] them before they cause more harm to our
[27:55] planet unquote. If you had an AI with
[27:58] [music] that philosophy that was in
[28:01] charge of your food system or your water
[28:03] system or your power grid or your
[28:06] financial system or your child's health
[28:09] or your child's education [music] and
[28:11] this is in the early stages. I mean
[28:13] we're only in this a few years. What do
[28:15] we do 2050 100 years from now? Where
[28:18] where does this lead? Now you begin to
[28:19] see where the problem is. [snorts] So AI
[28:23] Bible, why is this a really bad idea? As
[28:26] I mentioned, the Bible, when they say
[28:27] the Bible, they're talking about the
[28:30] Bibles that we know today. Uh that are
[28:33] either based in uh or or are include the
[28:37] Toras that those first five books.
[28:40] There's a mystery about the Torah that
[28:43] scientists are grappling with right now
[28:46] because it is so outrageous. What
[28:51] [music] what the Torah implies is so
[28:53] outrageous. And this mystery came to the
[28:56] scientific forefront in 1994. Now, there
[28:59] have always been rabbis for hundreds of
[29:02] years in the past that have always said
[29:05] that underlying
[29:07] the words in [music] the Torah that we
[29:10] read as the letters on the page, there
[29:12] are coded there's a deeper a deeper
[29:15] tradition, a deeper message. The bottom
[29:18] line is that [music] there is a way to
[29:21] read the biblical texts that when we
[29:25] read the texts using what are called
[29:28] skip codes or equidistant letter
[29:31] sequences and again I'm going to
[29:32] describe these in just a moment uh that
[29:35] deeper meanings are are revealed. So in
[29:39] 1994 that paper was produced very
[29:42] controversial. So controversial [music]
[29:44] that in 1997
[29:47] a very famous experiment was run to
[29:49] either prove for once and for all or
[29:52] disprove [music]
[29:53] for once and for all that there's
[29:55] something going on with the Torah. The
[29:58] idea was to take the names of 34 famous
[30:01] rabbis
[30:03] uh in Jewish history and uh if they
[30:08] existed as we believe then they should
[30:12] be noted in this secret code in the
[30:14] Torah. [music] Now I just wanted to note
[30:17] here that what the rabbis have always
[30:19] said about the Torah is that it is
[30:21] essentially a quantum map of time. All
[30:24] that has ever happened [music] in the
[30:26] world, all that has ever been, all that
[30:28] is, all that will be is already encoded
[30:33] [music] into this document that appeared
[30:35] on Earth 3,000 years ago. It's a quantum
[30:39] map of all possibilities. So, this is
[30:42] what this the scientists were struggling
[30:43] with. So, they said, "Okay, if we put in
[30:45] these 34 famous rabbis,
[30:49] uh, let's see if their names are in
[30:51] there." Well, not only were their names
[30:53] in there, but the Torah identified the
[30:55] place of their birth, the place of their
[30:57] death, the years of their birth. What
[30:59] makes this especially credible [music]
[31:01] is the experiment was conducted by a man
[31:03] named Harold Gans. He was the former
[31:06] senior cryptologic mathematician for the
[31:08] US NSA, the National [music]
[31:11] Security Agency, the the top secret
[31:14] security agency, the cryptologic agency
[31:16] that uh is is dealing with so much of
[31:19] the the AI and things like that that
[31:22] we're seeing today. So the Torah for
[31:25] this experiment, it exceeded the
[31:27] expectations. It didn't just reveal the
[31:29] names. It revealed the locations, the
[31:31] dates of the birth, dates of the death,
[31:33] cities where they lived, and all of
[31:34] these things. Uh, and now the scientists
[31:38] [music] were left with the question, how
[31:40] could the book 3,000 years ago, the
[31:44] Torah, have known about this
[31:46] information? Number one. Number two,
[31:48] this is where it gets really
[31:49] interesting, what else [music] is
[31:51] encoded in that Torah? So that began a
[31:56] series of experiments that continue to
[31:58] this day. During the cold war, the
[32:01] governments were at war, but scientists
[32:04] were still cooperating. It was a very
[32:06] civilized kind of of a war. And Russian
[32:09] scientists were the first that began to
[32:11] look at the human body from an IT
[32:14] perspective. They started looking at
[32:16] cells as circuits. And they were looking
[32:18] at mitochondria as capacitors and
[32:21] resistors and transistors.
[32:23] uh and that has led to a very very
[32:26] different way of thinking about the
[32:28] human body in the journal uh soft
[32:30] computing proceedings from the uh the
[32:33] conference of soft computing they
[32:35] literally stated that human DNA is a
[32:39] fractal antenna. So what that means is
[32:42] the DNA an antenna tunes to a signal
[32:46] fractal antenna tunes to many signals
[32:49] across a broad spectrum of of
[32:51] information. So mathematically what
[32:54] we're talking about is the ability to
[32:57] because we can consciously change the
[33:00] morphology of our DNA. We can
[33:03] consciously thought, feeling, emotion,
[33:05] belief, breath, f epigenetic triggers
[33:07] [music] change the morphology. We're
[33:09] changing what our fractal antenna is is
[33:13] [music] accessing. And that is the link
[33:15] to consciousness right there. I think
[33:16] that's that's what we're talking about.
[33:18] It
[33:18] >> it definitely feels like that. And
[33:20] [music] and so it started to make me
[33:22] think, okay, maybe this whole universe
[33:24] is something more related to this
[33:27] consciousness that connects everything.
[33:30] And for example, you know, I spent a lot
[33:32] of time also working with my friend and
[33:34] colleagueuh Alan Green on on Gimatria
[33:38] type codes that were found in the King
[33:40] James version of the Bible. And you
[33:42] know, the people that wrote the Bible
[33:44] were the same people we believe that you
[33:46] know posed as Shakespeare.
[33:48] And and basically, you know, the whole
[33:51] ba Bible, the King James version is
[33:53] literally encoded.
[33:54] >> Yeah.
[33:54] >> With encryptions.
[33:56] And and a lot of this is so fascinating
[33:59] because what it says to us is almost
[34:01] like what we see on the surface of the
[34:03] world [music] is one paradigm unless you
[34:07] actually go into this place of of pure
[34:09] intention which I think is what you did
[34:11] in trying to understand where you picked
[34:13] out you know the the sephriets and you
[34:16] basically said I want to go for this the
[34:18] most esoteric text. I want to understand
[34:20] what the mysteries are in this and that
[34:22] these encryptions that are at the next
[34:24] level down or the you know the deeper
[34:27] introspection requirement is actually
[34:31] there so that it can be found. It's not
[34:33] hidden so that it will never be found.
[34:35] It's there so that it can be found by
[34:38] the by the initiate who is really
[34:40] looking introspectively and wanting to
[34:43] understand the mysteries.
[34:45] >> I I I agree couldn't agree more, Robert.
[34:47] And and so the bigger context, if if we
[34:50] just look at this, it's interesting, but
[34:52] you look at the big context, we're
[34:54] barreling down the path of a a cyclic
[34:58] event that drives the kinds of shifts
[35:02] [music] and the paradigm shifts that
[35:04] that forever change the world and life
[35:06] in the world.
[35:08] And [clears throat] it's only now that
[35:10] we are
[35:12] uh within the window of time and I can
[35:15] say this within the window of time
[35:17] geologically when these cycles have
[35:20] occurred in the past. Cosmologically
[35:22] we're within the window of time and then
[35:24] we can look socially and politically at
[35:26] the world. We can see that the
[35:29] unsustainable systems are buckling and
[35:31] collapsing. We're moving towards some
[35:33] kind of a new paradigm. My sense is that
[35:36] we don't want that new world based on
[35:40] the hurt and the suffering and the
[35:43] atrocities that we all have seen in our
[35:46] lifetimes in the 20th and now the 21st
[35:49] centuries and and [music] the way to
[35:50] transcend that I think and this is I
[35:53] think the message of everything we're
[35:55] saying we are not what we have been told
[35:57] and we are so much more
[35:59] >> we're we're more Robert than we have
[36:02] probably even dared to allow ourselves
[36:04] elves to think about our our own our own
[36:07] being. And as we [music] if we embrace
[36:10] not even the whole picture, just embrace
[36:13] a little of that, what that does, it
[36:16] shifts that trajectory away from a a
[36:20] future of of suffering and war into an
[36:24] uncharted future based upon the way we
[36:27] are learning to think about ourselves.
[36:30] Because all the tech, AI, nuclear
[36:33] weapons, you know, genetic engineering,
[36:35] crisper, whatever it is, it's just tech.
[36:38] It's not good, bad, right or wrong. It's
[36:40] the thinking underlying how it's used.
[36:42] And as we embrace the deep truth of who
[36:45] we are as a society and individuals that
[36:49] will be reflected in the choices that we
[36:51] make with that technology, that's how
[36:53] you build a new world. A growing number
[36:56] of mainstream scientists are now putting
[36:58] forward an idea that is uh gaining
[37:02] tremendous momentum regarding
[37:04] consciousness uh who we are in
[37:06] consciousness, the nature of our
[37:09] physical reality [music] uh and how
[37:11] things really work. And when when we
[37:14] first hear about this idea, it almost
[37:15] sounds like science fiction. And then we
[37:17] ask where does science fiction come
[37:19] [music] from? Many times it comes from
[37:21] the intuitive hit of how the world works
[37:24] and what's possible and then it [music]
[37:26] becomes the reality of our world. What
[37:28] these science are saying, MIT scientist
[37:30] Seth Lloyd for example in his 2000 book
[37:32] programming the [music] universe
[37:34] literally is proposing that our entire
[37:37] universe in consciousness
[37:39] is either [music]
[37:41] a computer in and of itself that the
[37:44] universe is a [music] quantum computer.
[37:45] This is what they're saying. or if the
[37:48] universe is not a quantum computer
[37:51] that [music] the universe is the
[37:53] simulation that is being run on a big
[37:56] computer somewhere. And when I first
[37:59] began to hear this, you know, at first
[38:01] as a scientist, I think, you know, this
[38:03] sounds pretty out there, but I began to
[38:06] explore why mainstream physicists would
[38:10] uh at at leading universities would
[38:12] begin to to look at things this way. In
[38:14] my my training, I was a senior computer
[38:16] systems designer uh for Martin Marriott
[38:18] Aerospace during during the cold war
[38:20] years. So, of course, it's my language.
[38:22] [music] The more I began to understand
[38:24] and I looked at the comparisons, every
[38:26] computer [music] has a language that it
[38:29] uses to get things done. Uh
[38:32] consciousness [music] is the operating
[38:34] system of this universal computer and
[38:37] belief is the language that it
[38:39] recognizes.
[38:40] uh every computer turns bits of [music]
[38:43] information off and on to make things
[38:45] happen. And I said, "Well, in the
[38:47] universe, we don't have bits." [music]
[38:49] And uh and I began looking at the
[38:51] comparisons and they're looking at
[38:53] literally the stuff our world is made
[38:55] of. The atoms are the bits. When the
[38:57] atoms are turned on and in physical
[39:00] existence, they are reality. When they
[39:02] are not turned on, they are unatoms or
[39:05] anti-atoms or antimatter that are not in
[39:07] existence. [music] And they're they're
[39:10] taking this uh so seriously this [music]
[39:13] uh this proposition that we may
[39:15] literally be living a simulation of of
[39:17] some kind that they've done mathematic
[39:20] modeling [music] to determine
[39:23] the probability that we are or are not
[39:27] living a simulation. And [music] the the
[39:30] mathematics suggest strongly that we are
[39:34] living in a simulation.
[39:36] >> [music]
[39:36] >> And the reason I'm I'm mentioning this
[39:38] here, I know it's a very different way
[39:40] of thinking about things. It sounds like
[39:41] the movie The Matrix, but where did that
[39:42] come from? The reason that this is
[39:45] important is because when we begin
[39:46] talking about the soul, what the ancient
[39:48] [music] indigenous traditions say to us
[39:51] is that while a part of our soul uh
[39:54] speaks and experiences through this
[39:56] body, we're not really here at all.
[39:58] [music] That our higher self uh is is a
[40:01] part of a greater existence. And [music]
[40:04] we always go like this. it's somewhere
[40:05] else expressing through this body. We've
[40:08] just come back from uh a tour in
[40:10] Australia. Uh and the Aboriginals
[40:12] [music] in Australia as well as many
[40:14] other traditions say this isn't the real
[40:15] world. This is the illusionary world. Uh
[40:18] and and they spend more of their time in
[40:20] what they believe is the real world,
[40:22] what we would call the dream [music]
[40:24] state. So all of this ties together when
[40:26] we talk about life and death uh
[40:30] existence, consciousness [music]
[40:31] between lifetimes. Where do we go when
[40:34] we leave this body? Uh from the
[40:37] perspective of these these [music] new
[40:39] ways of seeing things from uh physicists
[40:42] and quantum physicists who are looking
[40:44] at this as a simulation. It's when our
[40:46] part of the simulation [music] is over.
[40:48] Uh it doesn't mean that we are gone
[40:50] forever. It just means that we're no
[40:51] longer expressing here and we're in
[40:53] those higher dimensions wherever this
[40:56] simulation is being run from. So it's a
[40:58] it [music] is a fascinating concept and
[41:01] the more we begin to explore it and and
[41:03] when you look at the mathematics and
[41:05] they plug in all the variables they say
[41:07] it's more likely than not that we are
[41:09] actually living [music] in uh in a
[41:12] universe that is is the result of a
[41:14] massive simulation that's being run from
[41:17] somewhere else. Sounds like a Star Trek
[41:18] episode.
[41:19] >> [music]
[41:20] >> uh Seth Lloyd is is the man the MIT uh
[41:23] physics professor who's developed the
[41:26] first feasible [music]
[41:27] viable quantum computer and he said even
[41:31] in the infancy of our computers a
[41:33] quantum computer is so powerful it
[41:35] wouldn't take much more to model an
[41:38] entire universe on a quantum computer
[41:40] [music] and the thinking is that who or
[41:41] whatever is responsible for the
[41:43] simulation is probably light years ahead
[41:46] of us in terms of technology so So
[41:49] [music] to believe that they may have
[41:51] quantum computers that could manipulate
[41:53] the bits of [music] matter and it sounds
[41:55] very technical in some respects uh and
[41:58] it stretches us in some respects and
[42:00] [music] it also and that's the purpose
[42:01] of films like this to we're looking for
[42:03] new ideas new ways to think out of the
[42:05] box whether it is a reality or even if
[42:09] it's only a metaphor [music] even if we
[42:11] only use this as a metaphor it's a
[42:13] powerful metaphor that allows us [music]
[42:16] to hang our beliefs upon on because
[42:19] whether it is a physical reality or a
[42:22] metaphor that we live in a simulation,
[42:24] the bottom line is this [music] that if
[42:26] we understand the language that this
[42:29] reality recognizes, [music]
[42:31] then we are no longer limited by the
[42:34] laws, the relative laws of physics as we
[42:36] know them. It means that we no longer
[42:38] have to suffer in our lives or age or we
[42:40] don't have to have the poverty and the
[42:42] disease. We don't have to have the war.
[42:43] If we understand the language, then we
[42:46] literally can rewrite the reality code
[42:48] that runs our uh real or uh metaphoric
[42:52] simulation. And to me, it's we need some
[42:54] new ideas to look at the world. It's
[42:56] very interesting that a Nobel Prize was
[42:59] awarded a number of decades ago to a man
[43:02] named Eckles [music] whose work was
[43:04] based on finding the origin of thoughts
[43:07] in the human mind. And he said at the
[43:09] end of it he found that there was no one
[43:11] part of the brain that was responsible
[43:13] for starting the process of having a
[43:15] thought in the human mind. Instead what
[43:18] happened is that a [music] type of
[43:20] higherdimensional field he said
[43:22] interacts with the human head at the
[43:24] location of the supplementary motor
[43:26] area. Well the supplementary motor area
[43:28] if you look on an anatomy diagram is
[43:30] exactly where the crown
[43:31] >> center. Absolutely.
[43:33] >> Exactly. And then we take it in from
[43:36] these higher points as a pack thought
[43:38] form and then we unpack it [music]
[43:40] through the firing of the neurons into
[43:41] thoughts in the brain.
[43:43] >> Exactly.
[43:43] >> So one of the ways to understand how to
[43:45] work with it is always [music] based on
[43:47] sacred geometry because everything has a
[43:49] pattern including how to activate the
[43:51] energy centers of the human body. There
[43:53] are multiple patterns involved here but
[43:55] the most fundamental one is what you see
[43:57] in all the classical traditions as a
[43:58] point in the center of a circle.
[44:00] And so that point in the center of the
[44:02] circle, [music] the point is zero
[44:04] dimensional and it's our in biogeeometry
[44:07] it's referred to as a transcendental
[44:09] gateway beyond space and time. And
[44:12] that's meant quite literally.
[44:13] >> It's like a portal.
[44:14] >> Exactly. In biogeeometry.
[44:17] And then the circle around it [music] is
[44:19] the movement from that center expanding
[44:22] outward like the singularity in physics
[44:24] moving outward to [music] become
[44:26] manifest creation creating space and
[44:28] time with it to create the perfect form
[44:30] in sacred [music] geometry which is the
[44:31] sphere.
[44:32] >> Mhm.
[44:33] >> Because every point on the surface of
[44:35] the sphere is equidistant from the
[44:37] center. But the center is always the
[44:39] key. The center is how we connect to
[44:42] dimensions
[44:44] of the highest possible level.
[44:46] >> Well, except for the [music] earth, of
[44:47] course, it's flat. [laughter]
[44:50] >> And so
[44:50] >> that's the biggest argument for the fact
[44:52] that the earth is not flat because
[44:54] [music] everything operates in a
[44:56] spheroid, so to speak.
[44:57] >> And that's because if you're going to go
[44:59] from zero dimensionality to create a
[45:01] container for physical creation to be
[45:04] able to manifest in, the [music] perfect
[45:06] container is that of the sphere.
[45:08] >> Always. And so if we become aware of any
[45:10] energy center in the human body, so for
[45:12] [music] example, if the person viewing
[45:15] our interview here was to put their
[45:16] attention on one of the easiest energy
[45:18] centers to feel, which is the one
[45:20] between the eyebrows slightly [music]
[45:21] inside the head, the ana center of the
[45:24] Himalayan initiation. If you put your
[45:26] attention in that, just close the eyes
[45:28] and you put [music] your attention at
[45:30] that point,
[45:32] then one of the processes from the
[45:33] Himalayan tradition that I learned with
[45:35] Dr. Sigon at the Clare Vision School a
[45:37] number of years ago is that of move all
[45:40] of your energy and attention into
[45:41] [music] the center of the center of the
[45:44] center of the center of that point that
[45:46] you feel that energetic vibration of
[45:49] that energy center [music] in the body
[45:51] or even outside the body. And so there's
[45:53] a movement inwards and as you go inward
[45:56] [music] you start to connect to the
[45:59] actual core power of that energy center.
[46:02] And at a certain point of moving into
[46:04] the absolute center, [music]
[46:06] not only will it activate the energy
[46:08] center, it has a kind of effect of
[46:10] flicking an energetic [music] switch in
[46:12] the body of energy where the energy then
[46:14] begins to move back out in a counter
[46:17] movement. And at that point, [music]
[46:19] you'll feel a movement of light and
[46:21] energy out from the energetic center
[46:23] forming a sphere around it or
[46:26] potentially even like a sun radiating
[46:29] light and energy in all directions
[46:31] around that energy center. And so
[46:34] [music] this is the most primal
[46:35] movement, the one into the energy center
[46:37] and then allowing that to expand back
[46:39] out.
[46:40] >> Now when [music] it expands back out,
[46:42] does it bring with it new understanding,
[46:44] feeling, knowledge?
[46:46] >> It can. And in fact, the movement back
[46:49] out doesn't even have to take place to
[46:51] access the knowledge. You can access the
[46:53] knowledge with the movement inward.
[46:55] >> But that movement outward is then taking
[46:58] that [music] vibrational quality, that
[47:00] essence that you touched moving inward
[47:02] and allowing it to expand back out. But
[47:05] the thing about this that people need to
[47:07] understand is that [music] as the
[47:08] ancient mysteries went into decline and
[47:11] we came into modern materialistic times,
[47:13] what we got transmitted in metaphysics
[47:15] tended to be fragments of [music]
[47:17] complete systems.
[47:18] >> And so what you'll tend to find is that
[47:21] in one system versus another, they will
[47:24] teach only [music] one part of the
[47:25] movement. So I studied with many
[47:27] different traditions that only teach the
[47:29] movement into the center and that's it.
[47:32] You go into the center and you stay in
[47:33] [music] the center. Then there were
[47:34] others that started with putting the
[47:36] attention on the energy center and
[47:39] immediately expanding it [music] out to
[47:40] be a ball of light or a sun. But it
[47:43] really only works to its full capacity
[47:45] if both stages are together. [music]
[47:48] It's a type of pulsation movement. And
[47:50] so to move our attention into the center
[47:52] of the energy center is absolutely
[47:54] vital. But then there also has to be the
[47:56] counter movement back outward. And in
[47:58] that case, the consciousness that we
[48:01] access by moving into the center moves
[48:03] back outward in the [music] form of
[48:04] light. And then that's when you begin to
[48:07] activate the light around the energy
[48:09] centers, [music] around the body,
[48:10] forming the halo, all these types of
[48:13] things. And it then leads [music] to the
[48:16] fundamental understanding that then
[48:17] becomes experiential for a person that
[48:20] consciousness and light are the exact
[48:22] same thing. When you experience it in
[48:24] the inward [music] journey, it's
[48:26] consciousness. When it comes back out in
[48:28] manifestation, it's light. And so always
[48:31] the light auras around masters that you
[48:34] see in spiritual depictions are a
[48:36] representation of the level [music] of
[48:38] consciousness that they achieved because
[48:40] it comes back outward in its external
[48:42] expression as light. And so this [music]
[48:44] has many different aspects to it. But I
[48:46] would just simplify it for a general
[48:48] audience by saying every thought that we
[48:50] ever have, every emotion we ever
[48:52] generate creates an [music] energetic
[48:54] movement. And that begins to activate or
[48:58] to impair the action of particular
[49:00] energy centers in the body. It begins to
[49:03] move energy into greater geometric
[49:05] patterns. And so some very advanced
[49:08] spiritual masters in some traditions
[49:09] like the Himalayas, one of the first
[49:11] things they'll do when they're sitting
[49:12] with a new disciple is that they'll look
[49:14] at them and they'll see what's the
[49:16] structure of the subtle body [music] and
[49:17] to what degree is that central axis
[49:20] fully developed. If it's not fully
[49:22] developed, they know they haven't done a
[49:23] lot of work before. If that central axis
[49:26] is highly developed then in a short
[49:27] period of time they can activate the
[49:28] centers above the head achieve the pack
[49:31] thought forms and be able to be fully
[49:33] conscious in realms beyond the physical
[49:35] >> and so that structuring of the subtle
[49:37] body I think is so important and it
[49:39] links to the type of karmic things like
[49:40] you're talking about
[49:42] >> that those things created a structure in
[49:44] the subtle bodies that need to be
[49:47] illuminated and transformed and the way
[49:49] to transform it is through light and
[49:51] light comes from the consciousness that
[49:53] [music] we place on
[49:54] If we're honest with ourselves, we know
[49:56] that the world is changing and we also
[49:58] know that the old ways of thinking are
[50:00] failing when it comes to solving the big
[50:02] problems [music] like climate change and
[50:04] war. We need a new way to think about
[50:07] our world and a new language to solve
[50:09] our problems. Simulation by design is an
[50:12] invitation. It invites us to think
[50:14] differently about ourselves, about
[50:16] yourself, and what you've been taught
[50:18] when it comes to our world and our past.
[50:20] The science gives us rocksolid reasons
[50:23] to think differently, but the events of
[50:25] today's world tell us that now is the
[50:28] time to do so. So, as we begin to
[50:31] embrace the possibility [music] that we
[50:32] are living in a simulated world, we also
[50:35] unlock the [music] deepest mysteries of
[50:37] our existence. At the same time, we're
[50:39] discovering what it takes for us to
[50:41] become the best people we can be and
[50:43] [music] to create the best possible
[50:44] world. energy as information. But the
[50:48] energy of our world is nothing more than
[50:51] information and [music] that is going to
[50:53] be very important when we consider our
[50:56] simulation, how it began, how long it
[50:59] lasts and what happens [music] when it
[51:01] ends. So we're building a vocabulary
[51:04] right now so we can have this
[51:05] conversation shortly.
[51:07] So when we apply this idea of a simple
[51:11] recursive fractal code to our simulated
[51:14] reality, [music] we discover some very
[51:17] powerful implications.
[51:19] Let's go back to our familiar cotch
[51:22] snowflake so that I can show you exactly
[51:24] what I mean here. [music] There are two
[51:27] big questions frequently come up when we
[51:30] talk about us living in the simulation.
[51:32] [music] First question is what are the
[51:35] limits of our simulation? How long can
[51:38] it last? Are we limited in terms of the
[51:40] simulation size? And after all, [music]
[51:43] if the universe continues to expand, how
[51:46] big can it really become? Question
[51:49] number two, if we are limited, how long
[51:52] can this simulation continue to run
[51:54] before we reach that [music] limit?
[51:56] Right? These are big questions. The
[51:58] implications are huge. And our cotch
[52:01] snowflake gives us the clues to both
[52:04] answers. And they may surprise you as
[52:06] much as they did the scientists [music]
[52:07] that discovered them in 1975.
[52:10] So let me first summarize what this
[52:13] snowflake [music] is showing us. The
[52:16] mathematics
[52:17] show us that there is in fact a limit
[52:20] when it [music] comes to the area that
[52:23] the snowflake may occupy. However, there
[52:26] appears to be no limit as to how [music]
[52:29] complex the edges of that area can
[52:32] become. All right, so let me repeat what
[52:34] I just said. There appears to be no
[52:37] limit when it comes [music] to how
[52:39] complex the edges of our pattern of our
[52:43] snowflake can become. [music] But there
[52:45] is a limit to how large it can grow. And
[52:49] here's what I mean. [music]
[52:50] With the first iteration of the fractal
[52:53] code to create the snowflake, the area
[52:56] increased by a specific amount. It was
[52:59] by a factor of 1/3. [music]
[53:02] Now, with the second iteration, the area
[53:04] still increases, but it increases to a
[53:07] much lesser degree. It's actually only
[53:10] 427s. [music]
[53:12] That is the fractional degree of the
[53:15] increase. The third iteration when we're
[53:17] building those triangles [music]
[53:19] along the the flat edges, that third
[53:22] iteration
[53:23] increases by an even smaller amount of
[53:26] 16 over 243 [music]
[53:29] and the fourth iteration by a factor of
[53:32] 64 over 2,187
[53:35] and so on. So you can see what's
[53:37] happening here. You can see the trend.
[53:38] [music] It's clear. the numbers that
[53:42] represent the area are getting smaller
[53:45] and smaller [music]
[53:46] and they seem to be moving towards zero.
[53:49] So intuitively
[53:51] this is precisely where we'd expect
[53:52] [music] those numbers to go. However,
[53:55] this is where things get really really
[53:57] interesting because [music] if we plot
[54:00] this information on a graph, if we plot
[54:03] on a graph the complexity and how
[54:08] [music] the size is changing, what we
[54:10] see is that the change does not continue
[54:13] indefinitely. It actually levels out at
[54:16] a specific [music] size. And you're
[54:18] going to find this size very
[54:19] interesting. The growth levels out at
[54:23] 1.6 6 [music]
[54:24] times of the area of the original
[54:27] triangle. 1.6.
[54:29] And those of you watching this, if you
[54:30] watch a lot of Gaia, I know you've seen
[54:32] this number before. It's a very
[54:33] significant number. It's part of a
[54:36] series [music] that we see commonly in
[54:39] nature. We also see it in our bodies and
[54:41] we see it in living systems. [music]
[54:43] It's part of a series that is known as
[54:45] the Fibonacci mathematics series 1.6.
[54:49] [music]
[54:50] So what we're saying here is that the
[54:52] area of our cotch snowflake [music]
[54:55] does have a limit in terms of how large
[54:59] it can become and how much [music] space
[55:01] it can occupy. So I'm going to pause
[55:03] right there. I'm going to pause and
[55:06] invite you now to think about this
[55:07] [music] in terms of our simulation.
[55:10] What this snowflake is telling us is
[55:12] that our simulation [music] has a limit
[55:15] in terms of how large it can become and
[55:17] how much space it can occupy. All right.
[55:20] Now, the perimeter of the snowflake,
[55:23] remember the perimeter is getting
[55:25] [music] more and more and more complex.
[55:28] It tells us a different story. the
[55:30] number of times [music] that the
[55:32] perimeter can change to become more
[55:35] complex. The number of those little
[55:37] [music] triangles that we can put on
[55:38] that perimeter as the edges become more
[55:41] and more and more complex is infinite.
[55:45] Okay? And this is good news for us. This
[55:48] fact is a key to understanding our
[55:51] simulation. [music] And here's the
[55:52] reason why. The rhythms of nature in the
[55:56] natural world and the [music] universe
[55:58] all appear to be governed by cycles and
[56:01] the limits that follow this recursive
[56:04] code. [clears throat] This suggests that
[56:06] our simulated world does in fact have
[56:09] limits both in terms of how much area
[56:13] the universe may occupy and how long our
[56:16] simulation lasts. However, it also
[56:19] suggests that the possibilities of our
[56:22] experience within these boundaries, in
[56:24] other words, how complex our perimeter
[56:28] may become is infinite.
