BrightStar

Sfoglia tutti i Events

Scopri incontri consapevoli

events

Yoga
Meditation
Breathwork
Qigong
Tai Chi
Sacred Music
World Music
Medicine Music
Sound Healing
Ecstatic Dance
Destinazioni popolari
BaliSedonaLos AngelesCosta RicaNew YorkSan FranciscoAustinMiamiJoshua TreeTulum
Vedi tutte le categorieVedi tutte le destinazioni

Esplora tutte le funzionalità

Strumenti potenti per far crescere i tuoi eventi

Funzionalità della piattaforma

Prezzi dinamici intelligenti
Categorie di biglietti
Posti assegnati
Recupero carrelli abbandonati
Recupero visitatori
Donazioni e prezzi variabili
Sistema affiliati
Scanner biglietti
Codici sconto
Domande personalizzate
Condivisione biglietti
Upsell e componenti aggiuntivi
Analisi e report
Sequenze email
Lista d'attesa / Notifica / Promemoria
Persone e Luoghi
Artists & TeachersEvent OrganizersVenues & StudiosKnowledge BaseGlossaryInspiration
Vedi tutte le funzionalitàChi siamo
PrezziBlog
Language
Saved events
Sfoglia tutti gli eventi

events

YogaMeditationBreathworkQigongTai ChiSacred MusicWorld MusicMedicine Music

Destinazioni popolari

BaliSedonaLos AngelesCosta RicaNew YorkSan Francisco

Persone e Luoghi

Artists & TeachersEvent OrganizersVenues & StudiosKnowledge BaseGlossaryInspiration

Funzionalità della piattaforma

Prezzi dinamici intelligentiCategorie di bigliettiPosti assegnatiRecupero carrelli abbandonatiRecupero visitatoriDonazioni e prezzi variabiliSistema affiliatiScanner bigliettiCodici scontoDomande personalizzateCondivisione bigliettiUpsell e componenti aggiuntiviAnalisi e reportSequenze emailLista d'attesa / Notifica / Promemoria
Vedi tutte le funzionalitàChi siamo
PrezziBlog
AccediRicercatoriCreatori
  • Sfoglia tutti i Eventi
  • Per i ricercatori
  • Yoga
  • Meditazione
  • Breathwork
  • Qigong
  • Tai chi
  • Musica sacra
  • World music
  • Musica medicina
  • Sound healing
  • Danza estatica
  • Ritiri
  • Workshop
  • Tutte le categorie →
  • Bali
  • Sedona
  • Los Angeles
  • Costa Rica
  • Tulum
  • Byron Bay
  • San Francisco
  • Austin
  • New York
  • San Diego
  • Denver
  • Seattle
  • Portland
  • Miami
  • Tutte le città →
  • Join the Movement
  • Why we list
  • Sell Globally
  • Per i creatori
  • Per team
  • Per gli scrittori
  • Per gli insegnanti
  • Per gli artisti kirtan
  • Per gli studi
  • Per i festival
  • Per i centri ritiro
  • Per le no-profit
  • Ambasciatore del brand
  • Biglietteria gratuita
  • Elevate
  • Amplify
  • Rete di 500K+ acquirenti
  • Recupero carrelli abbandonati
  • Prezzi dinamici intelligenti
  • Categorie di biglietti
  • Eventi ricorrenti
  • Posti assegnati
  • Sistema affiliati
  • Lista d'attesa / Notifica
  • Scanner biglietti
  • Widget incorporabile
  • Distribuzione eventi
  • Centro messaggi
  • Integrazioni
  • Report
  • Tutte le funzionalità →
  • Chi siamo
  • L’ecosistema
  • Blog
  • Glossario
  • Ispirazione
  • Centro assistenza
  • Contatti
  • Documentazione API
  • Risorse del brand
  • Carriere
  • Stampa
  • Termini di servizio
  • Informativa sulla privacy

Eventi

  • Sfoglia tutti i Eventi
  • Per i ricercatori
  • Yoga
  • Meditazione
  • Breathwork
  • Qigong
  • Tai chi
  • Musica sacra
  • World music
  • Musica medicina
  • Sound healing
  • Danza estatica
  • Ritiri
  • Workshop
  • Tutte le categorie →

Destinazioni

  • Bali
  • Sedona
  • Los Angeles
  • Costa Rica
  • Tulum
  • Byron Bay
  • San Francisco
  • Austin
  • New York
  • San Diego
  • Denver
  • Seattle
  • Portland
  • Miami
  • Tutte le città →

Per i creatori

  • Join the Movement
  • Why we list
  • Sell Globally
  • Per i creatori
  • Per team
  • Per gli scrittori
  • Per gli insegnanti
  • Per gli artisti kirtan
  • Per gli studi
  • Per i festival
  • Per i centri ritiro
  • Per le no-profit
  • Ambasciatore del brand
  • Biglietteria gratuita
  • Elevate
  • Amplify

Funzionalità

  • Rete di 500K+ acquirenti
  • Recupero carrelli abbandonati
  • Prezzi dinamici intelligenti
  • Categorie di biglietti
  • Eventi ricorrenti
  • Posti assegnati
  • Sistema affiliati
  • Lista d'attesa / Notifica
  • Scanner biglietti
  • Widget incorporabile
  • Distribuzione eventi
  • Centro messaggi
  • Integrazioni
  • Report
  • Tutte le funzionalità →

Azienda

  • Chi siamo
  • L’ecosistema
  • Blog
  • Glossario
  • Ispirazione
  • Centro assistenza
  • Contatti
  • Documentazione API
  • Risorse del brand
  • Carriere
  • Stampa
  • Termini di servizio
  • Informativa sulla privacy
BrightStar
Scarica l'app
Scarica suApp StoreDisponibile suGoogle Play
© 2026 BrightStar. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Inspiration

Inheriting a Psychedelic Legacy: Butterflies and the Archive

EF
Essentia Foundation
Oct 23, 2026
8 min di lettura

Da Essentia Foundation

Guarda · 5

Klea McKenna remembers the adults more than the ceremony. In one of the earliest scenes of her interview with the Essentia Foundation, she describes an ayahuasca circle in which she and her brother lay in sleeping bags on the floor while the grown-ups, in her words, were "losing their minds." She says that as a child you don't register that anything is strange. It is simply the weather of your life. That single image holds the whole conversation: a daughter of psychedelic philosopher Terence McKenna and ethnobotanist Kathleen Harrison, now a visual artist and writer, looking back at an unconventional youth and asking what it means to inherit both a family's visions and its archive. The talk moves from her parents' worldview to her own, from the slippery meaning of the word "culture" to the practical, almost forensic work of preserving decades of recorded talks through the Lux Natura Archive.

Lettura · 6 sezioni

What did growing up inside a psychedelic household actually look like?

McKenna's answer is characteristically precise. The childhood was unconventional, she says, but "most children you sort of what you get is all you know." It is only after leaving the family of origin, and comparing notes with other people, that the strangeness becomes visible. Her parents traveled constantly for their work, and they had what she calls a parenting attitude of "take your kids wherever you're going and just kind of let them go." The children played alongside local kids in Central and South America while a local babysitter was found so the adults could do their work.

The family lived in rural California, then in Hawaii, where, as she puts it, they lived "off the grid, like no electricity, no telephones, no anything." She calls that stretch "a kind of magical period," and it was during those years that she became aware of what she now understands as animism. The sense that the landscape is a living presence, not a backdrop, is the thread she pulls through everything that follows, including her photography.

Her distinctive relationship to nature, she is clear, was not solely her father's design. The relationship to plants and the natural world, she says, "was largely my mom's agenda as well." Her mother's influence is the quiet center of the account. Klea's reading of the family is that the person who actually felt the connection to nature was her mother, and that those values were then "translated through his intellect." Terence was gifted with language, and the ideas he built into talks and books carried the feeling that Kathleen Harrison lived.

Did Terence McKenna mean "culture is not your friend" literally?

This is the most interesting intellectual move in the interview, and it comes at about the five-minute mark, when the host raises the famous line. Terence McKenna's suspicion of culture, and his call to "return to nature," is one of the signature refrains in the archive. Klea does not dismiss it. She takes it apart.

"I actually think he sort of is like misusing the word culture or at least he needs more different words because he uses the word culture to mean a specific thing and then he uses it in other context to mean something entirely different."

— Klea McKenna, Essentia Foundation interview, 05:53

Her proposed reading is that he often meant "society" when he said "culture." What he meant, she argues, was "not so much that culture is bad but that the culture that is handed to you by default should be questioned and you should invent your own culture within your own communities." Then she adds a line that lands with a laugh in the room: "I think it was that American mainstream culture was bad."

The distinction matters for anyone who has read the phrase as a blanket rejection of human civilization. In Klea's account, the critique was narrower and more usable: the default inheritance of a society is not automatically yours to accept. That is a demand for conscious choice, not for withdrawal. She also notes that the meaning of the word has drifted over the forty-odd years since many of these talks were given, which is a reminder that archives do not just preserve statements; they preserve statements inside the vocabulary of their moment.

She is candid that she now listens to her father differently. She has been "archiving his work," and is developing a podcast drawn from the archival talks, which means spending long hours with recordings she once heard as family background. That act of close listening is where her revised reading comes from.

How do you carry psychedelic insight into ordinary life?

The interview returns repeatedly to a question the opening montage poses directly: how do you hold on to the insights you grasp in moments on psychedelics, and how do you bring them into your ordinary life? Klea's answer is not a method so much as a set of observations about the gap between experience and articulation.

She draws a distinction between the knowing that happens in the body and the knowing that happens in language. Her father was exceptionally good at articulating ideas, she says, but the felt sense behind those ideas was her mother's. This is a useful correction for anyone who treats a psychedelic thinker's books as the whole of the experience. The words are a translation, and translations lose something.

The question of how psychedelic experience relates to scientific theory and lived knowledge runs through the second half of the conversation as well. Klea approaches it with the sensibility of an artist rather than a debater. She is less interested in proving a claim than in making the experience legible enough to be shared, which is exactly what she is doing with the archive.

Why does catching butterflies describe Terence McKenna's life?

Her first major archival project began with her father's large butterfly collection. It is the artwork that opened the door to the archive, and she offers it as a metaphor for his life and for the problem of knowledge itself.

"You're chasing something alive and but once you capture it, you know, if you want to really study it, you cannot, you know, you have to kill it."

— Klea McKenna, Essentia Foundation interview, 27:58

The image is simple and precise. A psychedelic insight is a living thing: it moves, it resists being pinned down, and the act of fixing it in words or a display case changes what it is. Her art project, which she describes as a kind of healing ritual, is an attempt to sit with that tension rather than resolve it. The archive, in her hands, is less a museum of answers than a careful record of pursuits.

Her description of art as inheritance and mourning, given at the 23-minute mark, makes the same point from another angle. Working through her father's collection is a way of grieving him while also extending his work into a new form. It is a practice of holding on without freezing.

What is the Lux Natura Archive for?

The archive, which lives at terencemckenna.com, is the institutional expression of this project. It collects the talks, the materials, and the ideas that shaped a body of work now being revisited by a new generation. Klea's role in it is both personal and editorial: she is the one listening closely enough to notice when a word has changed meaning, and deciding how to present that for an audience that may hear "culture" in a different register than her father did.

That editorial stance is, in the end, the most generous thing about this conversation. Klea does not defend her father against his critics or canonize him as a prophet. She treats him as a thinker whose vocabulary needs translation, whose most useful ideas came out of her mother's lived knowledge, and whose instruction to "invent your own culture" still asks something of anyone who hears it today.

Where to go from here

If this conversation opened a door for you, the best next step is to listen to the source material. The Essentia Foundation interview, conducted by Hans Busstra at the Interdisciplinary Conference on Psychedelic Research, runs for about an hour and twenty-four minutes and is worth hearing in full. Klea McKenna's own work, including her camera-less photography, is collected at kleamckenna.com. The Lux Natura Archive and the official Terence McKenna podcast, which draws on the archival talks, are both at terencemckenna.com, and the Lux Natura YouTube channel is at youtube.com/@Lux.Natura.

Read the phrase "culture is not your friend" the way Klea reads it: as a question about which inheritance you accept by default, and which you choose to build yourself.

Comments

Loading the conversation…

Transcript

[0:00] you know, an Iawaska circle where then

[0:02] me and my brother are just like there

[0:04] sleeping in sleeping bags on the floor

[0:06] while the grown-ups are like, you know,

[0:08] losing their minds.

[0:09] >> How was that? That's

[0:11] >> again like you don't know that

[0:12] something's strange when you're a kid.

[0:14] It just is kind of

[0:16] >> I met visual artist Clea McKenna,

[0:19] daughter of psychedelic philosopher

[0:21] Terren McKenna [music]

[0:22] and ethnobbotonist Kathleen Harrison.

[0:24] For people like my parents, [music] our

[0:27] inner life is often as interesting or

[0:31] more interesting [music]

[0:32] than the outer world.

[0:34] >> Nature is some kind of minded entity.

[0:40] >> This feeling that the [music] landscape

[0:43] is alive and that it has an agenda like

[0:46] a will. I can see all the problems and

[0:50] [music] processes in my own life like

[0:52] reflected back to me and all the

[0:54] solutions.

[0:54] >> Clea is now archiving her parents'

[0:57] legacy and that started with an art

[0:59] project on Terren's [music] large

[1:01] butterfly collection

[1:03] catching butterflies. I mean that to me

[1:06] is sort of like a metaphor for for his

[1:08] life in a sense because you're chasing

[1:09] something [music] alive and but once you

[1:12] capture it, you know, if you want to

[1:13] really study it, you cannot, you know,

[1:15] you have to kill it. How do you hold on

[1:18] to the insights that [music] you grasp

[1:20] in moments on psychedelics? How do you

[1:23] hold how do you bring that into your

[1:25] down life?

[1:27] >> Return to nature. Culture is not your

[1:31] friend. The clock is ticking.

[1:33] >> When I [music] stand in a tropical

[1:35] rainforest, I feel as though I am

[1:37] standing in a library that is on fire.

[1:40] I think [music] what he meant was not so

[1:42] much that culture is bad, but that the

[1:47] culture that is [music] handed to you by

[1:48] default should be questioned and you

[1:50] should invent your own culture.

[1:58] A warm welcome at the Asencia

[1:59] Foundation's YouTube channel. I'm here

[2:01] in Harlem at the conference on

[2:03] psychedelic research and I have the

[2:05] pleasure of meeting Clea McKenna. Clea,

[2:07] a warm welcome. Thank you.

[2:09] >> You are a visual artist um who makes

[2:13] films, writes and your work has been

[2:15] published internationally and you are

[2:16] currently a Guggenheim fellow on

[2:20] photography and you master the craft of

[2:23] cameraless photography.

[2:25] >> Yes.

[2:26] >> Which is I think a direct way of playing

[2:28] with light, right? More direct than

[2:30] normal photography and it gives like

[2:32] beautiful images. We can show some of

[2:34] your work to our audience. I think it's

[2:35] it's beautiful. And you now also um are

[2:40] archiving the work of your father

[2:42] because you're the daughter of

[2:44] ethnobbotonist Kathleen Harrison and

[2:46] psychedelic philosopher Terrence McKenna

[2:48] that many of our audience will know and

[2:52] you are archiving the legacy of your

[2:54] parents um in the Lux Nura archive. So,

[2:58] it's just great to touch upon your work,

[3:01] the archive, your far father's legacy,

[3:04] and how all of that plays uh together.

[3:08] Um my first question to you I think many

[3:12] people of course hearing that you're the

[3:14] daughter of Terrence McKenna will be how

[3:16] it must have been to have the youth you

[3:19] have with a father doing this work your

[3:20] mother and to in reading also about this

[3:24] in the latest biography on your father

[3:28] it seems that to say that this was sort

[3:30] of an unconventional youth would be like

[3:32] even an understatement right

[3:34] >> yes so I guess where to start on how you

[3:38] reflect back on your youth and how it

[3:40] shaped you as a person but also as an

[3:41] artist.

[3:42] >> Yeah. Um

[3:44] yes, it it was unconventional but I

[3:47] think that you know like most children

[3:49] you sort of what you get is all you know

[3:53] and so there's a way in which as a child

[3:54] you sort of just accept this is how it

[3:57] is. Um, and it's only really once you

[3:59] maybe leave your family of origin and

[4:03] compare your life with other people that

[4:05] you realize how unusual it was or what

[4:08] what was lacking or what was there or,

[4:11] you know,

[4:12] >> [snorts]

[4:12] >> um,

[4:15] but yes, it definitely [sighs and gasps]

[4:18] shaped my artwork and my world view for

[4:21] sure. Um, not entirely. I'd like to

[4:24] think some of my vision is my own, but

[4:26] uh [gasps]

[4:28] I think certainly

[4:30] an awareness of um well relationship to

[4:34] nature that is just very uncommon in um

[4:39] you know western capitalist society kind

[4:41] of and that was given to us partly by

[4:46] the choices my parents made where to

[4:48] live what to value you know but also by

[4:52] their own worldview. view and perhaps

[4:54] more so by indigenous worldviews that we

[4:56] were exposed to as kids, you know,

[4:58] because as my parents would travel and

[5:00] do their work and we traveled a lot in

[5:02] Central and South America,

[5:04] >> um

[5:06] they sort of had the parenting attitude

[5:08] of take your kids wherever you're going

[5:09] and just kind of let them [laughter]

[5:13] go, you know, and so that meant we're

[5:15] playing alongside with the other kids

[5:17] wherever we are. and were kind of, you

[5:20] know, they'd find a local babysitter for

[5:22] us to go off and do while they do their

[5:23] thing. And um I think that exposure to

[5:29] different ways of living had a big

[5:31] impact. Um and I see that in my own

[5:35] artwork and in my own

[5:39] relationship to the world in ways that I

[5:41] thought was just kind of normal. And

[5:43] then the longer I am alive, the more I

[5:46] realize it is it is unique by

[5:48] comparison, at least within my own

[5:50] culture. Um, yeah.

[5:53] >> Yeah. And I think especially what you

[5:54] said that sort of choice your parents

[5:56] made for living in in culture and of

[5:59] course your father very much sort of uh

[6:02] followed that path through his own

[6:04] psychedelic experiences and had this

[6:06] sort of it's hard to say not not

[6:09] negatively but he had a sort of distrust

[6:10] in culture or sort of suspicion on

[6:12] culture like that we have to be be aware

[6:15] what culture does and we radically need

[6:17] to move back to nature. So uh that must

[6:20] have been strange to you. I I I can

[6:23] assume right sort of that how do you see

[6:25] that sort of that that sort of nature

[6:27] versus culture?

[6:29] >> Yes. I actually like listening to him

[6:32] now which I've been doing lately because

[6:34] I'm you know archiving his work and

[6:37] we're developing a podcast that pulls

[6:39] from all the archival talks. Um, I

[6:41] actually think he sort of is like

[6:44] misusing the word culture or at least he

[6:47] needs more different words because he

[6:49] uses the word culture to mean a specific

[6:51] thing and then he uses it in other

[6:53] context to mean something entirely

[6:55] different. And I think when he's talking

[6:56] about it in a negative sense like the

[6:58] culture is not your friend thing.

[7:02] >> I think he means more like society than

[7:05] culture. Do you know what I mean? M

[7:07] >> or maybe it's that over the last 40

[7:09] years our use of that word has evolved

[7:11] and now what it means is a little

[7:13] different than what it meant then. Um

[7:16] I think what he meant was not so much

[7:21] that culture is bad but that the culture

[7:25] that is handed to you by default should

[7:28] be questioned and you should invent your

[7:30] own culture within your own communities

[7:32] and within you know what I mean? I don't

[7:34] think it was that like culture as a

[7:36] concept was bad. I think it was that

[7:37] American mainstream culture was bad.

[7:40] [laughter]

[7:42] >> Yeah. And that's why you because you

[7:43] your your childhood was sort of in

[7:45] between the US and Hawaii where you were

[7:48] homeschooled, right? So you spent quite

[7:49] a lot of time like really in nature.

[7:52] >> Yes. Yes, we did. And that was also, you

[7:55] know, the relationship to plants and to

[7:57] to nature was largely my mom's agenda as

[8:01] well. And you know I think when I look

[8:04] at the way he talks about it he

[8:09] he is articulating it and he understands

[8:12] that intellectually and obviously he's

[8:14] very good at articulating ideas but I

[8:17] think that the person who was feeling

[8:19] that was my mom

[8:21] >> and then her values were being

[8:22] translated through his intellect you

[8:24] know.

[8:25] >> Ah that's interesting.

[8:26] >> Um but yes we lived very rurally in

[8:28] Hawaii. I mean, even in California, we

[8:30] lived rural in a small town out in the

[8:32] country. Um, you know, swimming in

[8:34] creeks and playing in the forest and all

[8:36] of that, but it wasn't, it was still

[8:39] California, you know. And then in

[8:41] Hawaii,

[8:43] excuse [clears throat] me, in Hawaii, we

[8:44] lived um off the grid, like no

[8:46] electricity, no telephones, no anything.

[8:51] Um, and that was definitely a kind of

[8:54] magical period. That was more also my

[8:57] early childhood. And then we moved back

[8:59] to California.

[9:00] >> Um,

[9:02] and yeah, it was a magical time for sure

[9:05] and a time when I became very um

[9:09] conscious of what I now understand as

[9:12] animism.

[9:13] >> But this feeling that the landscape is

[9:16] alive and that it has an agenda. Every

[9:19] not and when I say it, I don't mean like

[9:21] the earth, although that too. I mean

[9:23] like every little element in a

[9:26] landscape, you know, bug, plant, moss,

[9:31] that all of it has an agenda. So, not

[9:33] just that it's alive and that it's

[9:35] interconnected, but that it has like a

[9:37] will

[9:38] >> kind of I think was impressed upon us.

[9:41] And so what that does to your experience

[9:43] of being in nature, I've learned now, is

[9:46] that

[9:48] it is very hard to perceive nature as

[9:52] just like placid and beautiful. And this

[9:55] is in relation to being an artist and

[9:57] thinking about

[10:00] human perception of nature through art

[10:01] history, right? because that's my

[10:03] education is

[10:06] how most modern people perceive nature

[10:09] is a kind of um pastoral beauty. It's

[10:13] like a symbol of something

[10:16] >> calm, you know, and that is not at all

[10:18] how I experience nature. experience

[10:20] nature as um

[10:23] very active as many characters with many

[10:26] needs and wills and agendas all vying

[10:29] for what they want, you know. And so

[10:31] that makes the experience of being in a

[10:34] natural space much more like

[10:38] psychologically complicated and busy.

[10:40] It's more like being at a party with a

[10:42] lot of people and you're kind of aware

[10:44] of like people's social agendas and like

[10:46] oh he likes her but she doesn't want to

[10:49] talk to this person but you know but if

[10:51] you think of every plant and animal and

[10:52] organism that way then it makes things

[10:54] very um a little bit overwhelming.

[10:58] >> That's beautiful. I think what you said

[10:59] about sort of that animistic worldview

[11:01] and also the complexities it has and not

[11:04] this romantic view that that many of us

[11:06] have when we think about nature and um

[11:10] of course people who have had

[11:11] psychedelic experiences can sort of more

[11:14] relate to this I guess to the will of

[11:17] the the world around us

[11:19] >> and a big question I have is what

[11:20] psychedelics what the role was in your

[11:22] upbringing did your parents keep it sort

[11:24] of as a separate thing as their work was

[11:27] it integrated and were you introd uced

[11:28] early on to psychedelics.

[11:31] >> Yes, it was very integrated and they

[11:35] were of the opinion not to hide anything

[11:38] from their kids.

[11:40] >> Um, and I remember very clearly, you

[11:43] know, some of their closest friends even

[11:44] had kids who they who where the parents

[11:48] did hide it. So, we go over to their

[11:49] house and then they say, "Oh, you know,

[11:51] we can't get stoned until the kids are

[11:53] in bed." And my brother and I were

[11:55] always just like, "Okay." like

[11:57] [laughter] they also they know the kids

[11:58] know you know kids know everything.

[12:01] >> Um so no my parents were very open very

[12:04] they didn't hide anything. They talked

[12:06] with us a lot about all of it and it

[12:10] might be surprising to people to know

[12:11] that it was not just some loosey goosey

[12:14] like drugs are great. They had very

[12:18] strong moral judgments about which drugs

[12:21] are okay and which ones aren't

[12:23] >> and they laid that on heavily including

[12:25] a real judgment around alcohol

[12:28] >> as like that doesn't count you know like

[12:30] and that's for like normal people

[12:33] [laughter] that's not for us.

[12:34] >> Yeah. Um [clears throat] so yes they

[12:37] they it was around we were I mean prior

[12:40] to ever like taking psych they didn't

[12:42] give us psychedelics as small children

[12:44] although we did start very young but um

[12:47] but we were around other people taking

[12:49] psychedelics a lot

[12:50] >> including things like you know an

[12:52] Iawaska circle where then me and my

[12:54] brother just like there sleeping in

[12:56] sleeping bags on the floor while the

[12:58] grown-ups are like you know losing their

[13:00] minds.

[13:01] >> How was that? That's

[13:02] >> again like you don't know that

[13:04] something's strange when you're a kid.

[13:05] It just is kind of um

[13:10] >> but and then I would say, you know, in

[13:13] our we both started experimenting with

[13:15] with drugs of all kinds when we were

[13:18] probably like 13 about and um

[13:24] you would think that that then would be

[13:26] a very open conversation with given who

[13:28] my parents were. But I think that

[13:30] teenagers have a human nature to be

[13:34] secretive.

[13:36] >> You know, it's like part of being a

[13:37] teenager is about individuating from

[13:39] your parents.

[13:40] >> And so even then we were sneaky about

[13:45] things.

[13:46] >> Um [laughter and snorts] and sometimes

[13:47] not. You know, it'd be like I'd be

[13:48] sneaky and and get, you know, take

[13:51] mushrooms for me and my friends and then

[13:53] I'd also go with my mom to a peyote

[13:55] ceremony. So both were happening.

[13:58] secrecy and openness, you know. Um,

[14:02] but but my my psych psychedelic

[14:05] preference has always been psilocybin.

[14:08] That is the one I prefer. Um, and it

[14:11] still is. And yes, it has a it plays a

[14:14] role in my life for sure. Even in the 25

[14:16] years when I sort of like checked out of

[14:18] the psychedelic scene, um, and did my

[14:22] life, built a family, built an art

[14:24] career, um, psilocybin's always kind of

[14:27] a like

[14:29] touch point of like if I if it's been

[14:32] too long since I've done mushrooms, I'm

[14:34] like, I need to check back in with that,

[14:36] >> you know?

[14:37] >> And how do you relate to everything your

[14:39] father wrote about sort of the

[14:42] mushrooms? And I'm I'm asking this also

[14:43] in a personal level. For instance, I'm

[14:45] just as a sort of a analogy um I'm

[14:48] brought up like very Christian. So for

[14:50] me the route towards psychedelics was a

[14:52] long one. I only did my when I was

[14:53] [laughter]

[14:54] >> 35 or so and

[14:56] >> it's been like shocking uh and and be

[14:59] beautiful.

[15:01] But uh I'm telling you this because I I

[15:03] long pursued sort of to the worldview my

[15:05] my father had as of like Orthodox

[15:08] Christianity uh Protestant Christianity

[15:10] and uh always felt sort of this tension

[15:13] you have your own experience of what you

[15:14] think is God and then you have the the

[15:16] view of your parents right and uh and

[15:18] exactly what you say want to keep your

[15:20] own you make it your own I'm just

[15:21] curious how that was for you because you

[15:24] are then having these experiences being

[15:26] the daughter of worldwide being

[15:28] recognized as deep psychonaut and sort

[15:31] like a guru to many people.

[15:33] >> Was it to you ah now I'm I'm getting

[15:35] what my father's writing and saying all

[15:37] or was it like different? It's like

[15:39] that's his worldview. I'm having

[15:40] different experiences on these

[15:42] substances.

[15:44] >> I think that I never really placed it

[15:48] clearly like in conversation.

[15:51] >> I like I didn't really place it as like

[15:53] disagreeing or agreeing. I sort of found

[15:58] my experiences to be very personal, you

[16:03] know, and um I think there's definitely

[16:06] like some of the values that I absorbed

[16:09] from his and my mom's perspective, you

[16:12] know, like for example, some years ago

[16:15] when micro doing started to become

[16:17] popular and everyone's talking about

[16:19] their micro doing regime and whatnot, um

[16:22] I was like, [sighs and gasps]

[16:24] you know, And I realized, oh right, I

[16:26] very much absorbed the like five grams

[16:28] in silent darkness. Like this is this is

[16:30] my my lineage. Um I like big doses. But

[16:35] but there are also ways in which like

[16:37] the content of those experiences was

[16:41] my own. And also, you know, I think

[16:43] people assume that I like listened to

[16:47] all of his

[16:49] talks, which I

[16:53] I absorbed his ideology through osmosis,

[16:56] but not because I was like reading all

[16:58] of his books or listening to his talks.

[17:00] I was a kid, you know, he he died when I

[17:02] was 19. M so and then I did you know in

[17:05] the couple of years after he died I read

[17:07] several of his books and of course I

[17:09] attended many of his lectures when he

[17:11] was alive but from that point onward I

[17:13] didn't listen to a lecture of his for 20

[17:15] years

[17:16] >> because why would I you know

[17:18] >> um until more recently so

[17:23] >> I don't know I think part also another

[17:26] part that I have absorbed in a way that

[17:28] is his idea but that has also held me

[17:31] separate from it is that he really

[17:33] believed in the value of of individual

[17:36] lived experience

[17:38] >> and sort of in like never letting there

[17:41] be a middleman.

[17:42] >> Mhm.

[17:44] >> In lots of parts of life and I absorbed

[17:46] that. So I don't ever participate in

[17:48] anything organized, you know, I just do

[17:51] things my way and um in terms of like

[17:55] anything spiritual or psychedelic and um

[18:00] so that in a way is following in his

[18:02] footsteps, but it also means I also

[18:04] don't let him be the middleman for my

[18:06] experience, you know, if that makes

[18:08] >> Yeah, that's very interesting. Yeah,

[18:09] it's sort of it's being it's sort of

[18:11] practicing what he told and that means

[18:13] also not taking him as sort of the

[18:15] serious too seriously. And when you said

[18:17] sort of his ideology indeed I think

[18:20] >> what to me made your father such a

[18:23] beautiful

[18:25] person is that he he really tried sort

[18:27] of go to the other edge in these

[18:30] experiences and then to be critical to

[18:32] be to to to to try and be rational about

[18:35] it first. bring it back, think about it,

[18:38] link it with everything he he knew and

[18:40] he read like crazy.

[18:42] >> But it is sort of this way of

[18:44] intellectualizing it in a sense and

[18:46] bringing it in the rigor of science. And

[18:47] I think that's has been has been his

[18:48] legacy and has been tremendously

[18:50] important in the psychedelic world and

[18:52] bridging those worlds.

[18:55] Um but also it can be sort of some how

[18:58] do I say this sort of a a a disconnect

[19:00] between that direct experience and of

[19:02] course trying to intellectualize it

[19:03] because he ended up with like big

[19:05] theories also.

[19:07] >> Yes. Yes.

[19:07] >> That yes can be scrutinized I mean if

[19:11] you go through an irrationally. So how

[19:13] do you see that sort of that

[19:14] >> but but they were theories that were

[19:16] dependent on lived experience which like

[19:19] one of the things that's striking to me

[19:21] now being here at this conference is

[19:24] that everything is data driven

[19:26] >> you know which is so different than the

[19:29] psychedelic culture I was raised in. Um

[19:31] it was much more you know there was no

[19:34] data so how could you depend on data

[19:38] >> um you had to just depend on on

[19:40] philosophy basically you know and and

[19:42] and lived experience and so

[19:46] >> for his time maybe he it seemed like he

[19:49] was trying to take these ideas and

[19:51] filter them through some kind of

[19:52] legitimizing scientific perspective but

[19:55] I I don't think that's really what was

[19:57] happening. I I mean he was not a

[19:59] scientist. he was not a doctor, you

[20:01] know, um he was really more of a

[20:04] philosopher who was informed by all of

[20:06] these fields.

[20:08] >> But now listening to these lectures

[20:10] here, um you know, these people are

[20:14] really really

[20:16] >> into the data

[20:18] >> and so so it's it's a very different

[20:20] approach.

[20:21] >> Yeah, it is. And your father was also of

[20:23] course an artist, right? In a sense.

[20:26] >> I I think so. I mean when I look at it

[20:28] now I see his work I experience his work

[20:30] as art partly because

[20:33] [clears throat]

[20:35] that taking that perspective to it

[20:37] allows me to enjoy it without picking it

[20:41] apart you know um

[20:45] also I'm an artist and I've spent my

[20:47] whole life looking at art and it's how I

[20:50] the strategy I know for engaging with

[20:53] something outside of me is to look at it

[20:55] as art and to

[20:58] not try to judge it based on like, well,

[21:00] is this factual? Do all the factors line

[21:03] up? Is it is he being consistent? Is he

[21:07] saying the same thing in this talk as

[21:08] this talk? You know, because I get

[21:10] questions like this from people like,

[21:11] well, in this one talk in 1984, he said

[21:13] this, but then in ' 91 he said this. So,

[21:15] what do you think he believed? I'm like,

[21:17] I don't know. Like,

[21:18] >> it's to me this is not important at all.

[21:21] Um, and that is again very like him, you

[21:23] know. He he used to say always don't let

[21:25] the truth get in the way of a good

[21:27] story. So I I guess [laughter]

[21:29] >> I like that. I like that. I can also see

[21:31] like it's verbal art only listening to

[21:33] McKenna talks if you've had especially

[21:35] if you had your first psychedelic

[21:36] experience. It's just

[21:38] >> a word of art what he does. You know he

[21:40] plays with the experience and he he

[21:42] links it to everything. But you

[21:44] shouldn't take it all literal literal of

[21:46] making these links as you say. But it is

[21:48] funny that a lot of people did do that

[21:50] in the archive you you presented here.

[21:52] For instance, you have these funny notes

[21:54] in the archive of people asking your

[21:56] father, "What did the mushrooms say we

[21:58] should do about Bush?" about George

[22:00] Bush, [laughter]

[22:01] >> like this guru, what like like this

[22:03] oracle.

[22:03] >> Well, and people all the also even the

[22:05] criticism of him as a public figure is

[22:08] that he, you know, advocated for drug

[22:10] use in a way that was unsafe, not

[22:12] everyone can handle five grams, these

[22:14] kinds of things. And to me, I'm like,

[22:16] well,

[22:18] >> again, he's not a doctor. He's not your

[22:20] doctor. He's not prescribing it. And if

[22:21] you're the kind of person who's taking

[22:23] advice from strangers online, you need

[22:25] to question your own intellect, you

[22:28] know, like that is not it is not

[22:30] instructions for life. In my opinion, it

[22:33] is a combination of philosophy,

[22:37] literature,

[22:39] um, you know, because of his way with

[22:41] language and performance.

[22:43] >> And the whole identity, the whole

[22:44] persona of him was a a a performance

[22:48] that he crafted, you know, and so the

[22:51] way I evaluate that is

[22:55] does it make me feel something? like

[22:58] when I listen to his talks or see him

[23:00] see a video of him talking

[23:02] >> do I feel moved by it either like it's

[23:06] expanding my mind or my heart and if I

[23:08] do then that's good art and that's the

[23:10] measure

[23:11] >> and I don't I I'm not that concerned

[23:13] beyond that kind of it I don't know yeah

[23:16] >> I like what you're saying that he played

[23:17] these roles also when you uh I found

[23:21] that emotional to to read how you spoke

[23:23] about an art project you did and I think

[23:25] it was your first step into this work of

[23:27] archiving the legacy of your father.

[23:30] After his death, he he left you a as a

[23:33] legacy a box with 2,000 butterflies,

[23:35] right, that he had collected early on in

[23:37] his career in the 60s and 70s, I think a

[23:39] lot in Asia. Um, you unpacked those,

[23:42] went through them, and photographed them

[23:45] in a book called The Butterfly Hunter.

[23:47] It's a beautiful book and I've only I

[23:50] haven't ordered the real book, but I've

[23:51] seen the pictures online and we see

[23:54] these butterflies on the the scraps of

[23:56] newspapers that he wrapped them in. So,

[23:58] you get these butterflies with tax about

[24:00] Reagan and sort of the politics of the

[24:02] day with the butterflies.

[24:04] >> I found it a beautiful art project.

[24:06] >> Thank you. [clears throat]

[24:07] >> And also how you spoke about it because

[24:09] it was to you this combination of

[24:11] processes, right? On the one hand, you

[24:13] were just archiving it and making art,

[24:16] but it was also mourning your father's

[24:18] death as you spoke about it. Could you

[24:20] tell us about that that process and what

[24:21] it meant me meant for you?

[24:23] >> Yeah. So, he died in 2000 and it was

[24:27] messy around his death. there were a lot

[24:29] of people involved who were sort of like

[24:31] vultures and um

[24:34] >> by the time he died we sort of checked

[24:38] out like we I think both my brother and

[24:40] I were just like we want out of this

[24:42] scene and um

[24:45] and then went on with our lives and yes

[24:47] I inherited this large trunk like a

[24:50] steamer trunk um filled with butterflies

[24:53] that had not been spread. I also

[24:55] inherited some drawers of ones he had

[24:58] spread and mounted.

[25:00] >> Um, but this trunk was filled with ones

[25:03] that were just wrapped, like you said,

[25:05] in whichever paper he had available to

[25:07] him while traveling. So, travel

[25:10] documents, typewriter pages with his

[25:12] writing on it, um, American news

[25:15] magazines, foreign newspapers, things

[25:17] cut out, you know, because you fold them

[25:18] into this triangle to fit the butterfly

[25:20] inside, folded flat. And uh

[25:26] in 2008 was when I did that project. So

[25:29] it was 8 years after he died. And

[25:31] because of the sort of mess around the

[25:34] time when he died, there had not really

[25:36] been a proper like family memorial.

[25:39] There had not really been a proper

[25:41] mourning process.

[25:42] >> Um which I see as as a failure now. I

[25:45] would do it very differently. But um I

[25:48] think yes that doing that project eight

[25:50] years later was a way of processing and

[25:54] mourning and [snorts]

[25:57] >> you know and it was very poignant

[25:58] because you're also dealing with the

[26:00] actual you know all these little dead

[26:02] physical bodies of the insects

[26:04] >> and

[26:06] >> they are fragile you know and they're

[26:08] crumbling in your hands kind of and um

[26:12] >> and they smell very strong of

[26:14] formaldahhide and mothball balls, you

[26:16] know, because he had packed that in the

[26:18] in the

[26:19] >> trunk.

[26:20] >> And so the smell I found would give me a

[26:23] headache if I did it for more than an

[26:25] hour. So I sort of had a daily I was in

[26:27] graduate school at the time in art

[26:29] school and I had a ritual where every

[26:31] morning around 10:00 a.m. The light was

[26:34] just right in my studio for

[26:36] photographing them for about an hour.

[26:39] >> And I could only handle the smell for

[26:41] about an hour. And so there I would do

[26:43] an hour of going through them, unfolding

[26:46] them, choosing which ones to photograph,

[26:48] photographing them, putting them all

[26:50] away. And it took several months of

[26:52] doing this. And it it was very much a

[26:55] morning ritual. And I'm I'm glad that I

[26:57] had that as an option, you know,

[26:59] >> and then thinking about it, writing

[27:00] about it, and ultimately I made an

[27:02] exhibition and then a book.

[27:04] >> Um,

[27:06] >> but yeah, it was helpful. You know, I

[27:08] think in general for me, art making, and

[27:12] often you only see this in retrospect,

[27:14] but art making is often um

[27:19] especially [clears throat] well,

[27:19] especially if you're someone who works

[27:20] in like projects and works in different

[27:23] mediums. Often you come up with an idea

[27:26] that you think is an idea to make a

[27:28] certain kind of art.

[27:29] >> Yeah.

[27:30] >> Right. Like, oh, I have this idea. It's

[27:32] going to look like this. But then once

[27:33] you go through the process of making it,

[27:35] you realize that in fact it was a

[27:37] prescription for a certain kind of

[27:38] action that you needed to take and the

[27:41] thing that you made is not what's as

[27:43] important as the experience you had

[27:45] making it. And in a way you're like

[27:47] self-prescribing what you need when you

[27:49] get these ideas, you know. So I very

[27:51] much see that project as that. It was an

[27:53] idea that

[27:54] >> that demanded I do a a ritual that

[27:57] needed doing.

[27:58] >> Yeah.

[27:58] >> Kind of. And it's a beautiful way of

[28:01] looking at things and it it reminds me

[28:03] of two things sort of like earlier on

[28:05] when we were talking about will like the

[28:07] will in nature. is like something deep

[28:09] that you need to do then as sort of a

[28:11] will. But that's just an association I

[28:13] have with with what we but but getting

[28:15] back to sort of the the metaphor of the

[28:18] butterfly hunter

[28:19] >> in your presentation there's this

[28:21] beautiful photo of your father standing

[28:23] in the midst of the jungle with a giant

[28:25] butterfly net

[28:27] >> and this image of catching butterflies.

[28:31] I mean that to me is sort of like a

[28:33] metaphor for for his life in a sense.

[28:35] Would you go along there? And of Because

[28:37] you're chasing something alive and but

[28:39] once you capture it, you know, if you

[28:41] want to really study it, you cannot, you

[28:43] know, you have to kill it. Yeah.

[28:45] >> Yes. And you know, he only did he only

[28:48] collected butterflies for four years,

[28:50] 1968 to 1972.

[28:53] And he became

[28:55] very

[28:57] >> [clears throat]

[28:57] >> um bothered by it and ultimately stopped

[29:01] doing it because he felt guilty. He felt

[29:04] both kind of squeamish, I think, and

[29:07] kind of guilty about it. And uh so later

[29:11] when my mom my mom and him met in 1975

[29:14] and she said there were a couple of

[29:16] times where they'd be somewhere exotic

[29:18] where he thought, "Oh my gosh, they're

[29:20] going to this kind of butterfly lives

[29:21] here and he like once or twice maybe in

[29:24] 1976 they were in the Amazon again. He

[29:27] caught one and then she said he said

[29:29] that's it. That was the last one. I'm

[29:31] not doing I'm never doing this again." M

[29:33] >> um because he sort of tapped back into

[29:35] that feeling of guilt about it. So it's

[29:38] interesting to me like it is can be seen

[29:40] as a metaphor but it also I think was a

[29:42] an ethical or a process of understanding

[29:45] his own ethics that he had to go through

[29:47] kind of.

[29:48] >> Um

[29:51] >> yes it's a it's a very poignant thing to

[29:53] do.

[29:54] >> Yeah indeed. and sort of the the the

[29:56] getting back to sort of the you telling

[29:59] about your early childhood and this

[30:00] deeply notion that that everything

[30:02] around us is alive and has a will and we

[30:04] can can can sort of we have to we have

[30:06] to relate to that and we participate in

[30:08] that. And a big question at this

[30:10] conference to many people is is um is

[30:13] sort of the the the psychedelic state

[30:16] and sort of the philos philosophical

[30:18] term is then sort of

[30:20] looking at the epistemics of you know is

[30:22] it does it give us true knowledge? Mhm.

[30:24] >> Of course, in the thinking of your

[30:26] father, I'd say that. So, how to is that

[30:29] to you personally when thinking about

[30:31] these sort of psychedelic states

[30:34] >> for my experience?

[30:35] >> Yeah.

[30:37] >> Um, yes. I I

[30:40] it does. I don't The word knowledge to

[30:43] me sometimes feels like

[30:46] it is about learning new information,

[30:50] which is not necessarily how it feels

[30:52] with psychedelics. For me, it feels a

[30:54] little more like understanding.

[30:57] >> It's more like things that are already

[30:59] there, knowledge that is maybe already

[31:01] in me somewhere, but I don't have access

[31:03] to, it reconnects me to it, you know,

[31:07] >> and so, but yes, absolutely. which is

[31:11] why I feel like I have to check in with

[31:12] that periodically is because it's and he

[31:16] talks about this a bit about like how do

[31:18] you hold on to the insights that you

[31:20] grasp in moments on psychedelics? How do

[31:24] you hold how do you bring that into your

[31:25] down life, [snorts]

[31:27] >> right? And I find that it works for a

[31:30] while

[31:31] >> and then it sort of like peters out and

[31:34] like this world takes over again and

[31:37] then I have to check back in to bring

[31:38] that back otherwise I I lose touch with

[31:41] it, you know.

[31:42] >> Um

[31:45] >> yeah.

[31:45] >> Yes. But I think that like my

[31:47] relationship to nature in particular and

[31:49] in into the way the relationship to

[31:52] nature question which I think

[31:54] psychedelics very much connect you to um

[31:59] it's not really like we say relationship

[32:01] to nature but it's not really about my

[32:03] relationship to nature. It's more about

[32:05] seeing how

[32:07] how everything is connected, but also

[32:09] how everything happening in nature, even

[32:12] in like the most mundane little pocket

[32:15] of it in your city park, is a sort of um

[32:19] allegory for human emotional experience.

[32:22] M.

[32:23] >> And so there's a way where like

[32:25] sometimes I can see in looking at a an

[32:30] area like a a glenn of trees and moss

[32:33] and leaves that are rotting and things

[32:35] that are climbing and eating something,

[32:37] you know, I can see all the problems and

[32:40] processes in my own life like reflected

[32:43] back to me and all the solutions in the

[32:45] sense of like, oh, this is how nature

[32:48] does death and and trauma and repair and

[32:52] community and all the things that are

[32:54] the major factors in human lives, you

[32:57] can find them in a kind of microcosm.

[32:59] >> Yeah.

[32:59] >> You know,

[33:00] >> yeah.

[33:01] >> In the biography on your father, strange

[33:03] attractor, there's this what is called a

[33:05] moment when your parents, they regularly

[33:08] sort of had sort of psychedelic retreats

[33:11] with the two of them. And one of them is

[33:14] described as sort of a trip of terror. I

[33:17] think in the 80s when they were coming

[33:19] on on psilocybin

[33:21] um high dose and um a thunderstorm

[33:24] started.

[33:25] >> Mhm.

[33:26] >> And how it's described is that that

[33:28] became one of the most difficult

[33:30] experiences for your father on

[33:32] psychedelics whereas your mother was

[33:34] difficult for her as well but she sort

[33:35] of managed

[33:36] >> and afterwards your father had sort of

[33:38] difficulty in sort of having to

[33:40] acknowledge that he couldn't handle that

[33:42] trip in a sense. And when you just spoke

[33:46] about sort of integration, to what

[33:48] degree was your father, I mean so much

[33:51] of the journeys that he undertook on

[33:53] psychics, to what degree was he able to

[33:55] integrate? Um because this to me was a

[33:58] story that your mother seemed more sort

[34:00] of like whole in sort of having the

[34:03] psychics and and as a person, but this

[34:05] is just how I read the read the book.

[34:08] >> Um

[34:10] >> well, the first thing I would say like I

[34:12] wasn't there. Yes. Sorry. Yeah.

[34:14] >> And also neither was anyone else who's

[34:17] recounted any of this. So like Graham

[34:19] >> who wrote the book like this is Graham's

[34:21] version.

[34:22] >> I check.

[34:22] >> Um I would guess that Graham's version

[34:25] comes mostly from Dennis's version, but

[34:27] Dennis also wasn't there.

[34:30] >> So let's just be conscious that like

[34:32] every every biography, every story is

[34:35] one person's version of a story.

[34:36] >> So maybe just leave it as an anecdote

[34:38] then.

[34:39] >> Yes. What I can say is I mean yes I

[34:42] agree with you that my dad had a bad

[34:44] trip and you know as one does sometimes

[34:47] when you do a lot of psychedelics and uh

[34:51] >> and I'm sure just knowing his

[34:52] personality that the fact that my mom

[34:54] weathered that better than him was hard

[34:56] for him to accept because you know ego.

[34:59] Um [sighs]

[35:01] >> however the sort of like myth that he

[35:04] never did psychedelics again is not true

[35:07] based on my experience. Um, and I don't

[35:10] know why that's such a thing out there,

[35:12] but um,

[35:16] >> yeah, and that's all I really know about

[35:18] it. And the only other thing I know

[35:19] about it really is that I know that my

[35:21] mom

[35:23] >> has been very irritated by other

[35:26] people's accounts of it

[35:27] >> and she was there. So, I trust her more

[35:30] than anyone else, you know.

[35:31] >> Yeah. And the role sort of that was

[35:34] projected on him. I mean, that must have

[35:36] been difficult for him as well, right?

[35:37] because you you are this sort of

[35:39] traveler and you get these stories and

[35:41] then you get all the projections of the

[35:42] psychedelic community

[35:44] >> and um you have to be someone and of

[35:48] course it was also his his his living

[35:50] sort of did you see during the 80s that

[35:52] that started to weigh on him or

[35:55] >> not during the 80s? No. I feel like 1989

[35:59] like this late 80s he was in his like

[36:01] intellectual [snorts]

[36:04] peak of he was he had figured out his

[36:07] public persona. He had it had calcified

[36:11] into like who he was and he um

[36:16] h was getting a lot of energy from his

[36:19] audience in the way that performers do

[36:21] where there's this kind of feedback. You

[36:23] know

[36:23] >> by the early 90s though I think by like

[36:26] 94 you know he was in a different stage.

[36:29] my parents had split up. That was hard

[36:31] on everyone, you know, and by the

[36:34] [clears throat] mid '9s, I think he was

[36:38] um a little bit disillusioned with his

[36:42] own role. And part of that part of that

[36:44] is just like professional burnout, you

[36:47] know, right? We all are like, what am I

[36:48] really doing? Like, you know, at a

[36:50] certain point. And then I also think

[36:52] like when I hear people sort of like

[36:54] critique that

[36:56] him maybe like slowing down a bit.

[37:00] >> I also think like you know I'm 45 now

[37:02] and I'm like well yeah

[37:05] >> like when you're partying in your 20s

[37:07] and 30s and then you're middle-aged like

[37:10] of course you want to like retreat a

[37:12] little. He wanted to live in Hawaii. He

[37:14] wanted to not travel as much. He was

[37:16] getting a little older. And then the

[37:17] other thing is we don't know in the, you

[37:20] know, latter half of the 90s, we don't

[37:22] know how long his brain cancer was like

[37:24] affecting him before we knew it was

[37:26] there. So there's some talks of his in

[37:28] the late '9s

[37:30] >> that to me, I think it was already

[37:32] affecting him. The way his voice sounds

[37:35] to me is sounds a little different

[37:37] >> than before. Like maybe there was

[37:39] something already going on, you know?

[37:42] >> Um, but I don't know that. I mean,

[37:44] that's just my intuition. But yeah, I

[37:46] mean, I think let's like it's okay to

[37:48] not go like pedal to the metal full

[37:51] blast for every moment of your life.

[37:53] >> Agree. And I love these pictures of the

[37:55] home he built in Hawaii with the big

[37:57] antenna. I was like,

[37:58] >> yes. He was trying to build a sort of

[38:00] like rural nest, but that could be like

[38:04] a a an antenna to the rest of the world.

[38:06] >> Yeah. And he wanted to connect. I'm just

[38:08] so so curious what your father would

[38:11] just ma think of what the world has

[38:14] become with the internet etc. in that

[38:15] sense his ideas and where we have now

[38:18] become I think

[38:19] >> and in your opinion people having these

[38:20] experiences on how to sort of

[38:22] communicate them because often it's sad

[38:24] these states are ineffable right and we

[38:26] cannot communicate of course your father

[38:27] did it in words you do it in art and

[38:29] writing as well but I I find it funny to

[38:33] hear you being annoyed about psychedelic

[38:36] art and a lot of the psychedelic art we

[38:38] see could you tell us just about

[38:39] [laughter] your critique on that

[38:41] >> at the risk of offending people Um,

[38:46] so there's two different things. There's

[38:47] there's there's visionary art,

[38:50] >> right,

[38:50] >> which

[38:52] I tend to not love. That doesn't mean

[38:55] there's not some great work in there,

[38:57] but and then there's just like more

[38:59] broadly the aesthetics of the

[39:01] psychedelic scene.

[39:03] >> And this lands differently here because

[39:06] the psychedelic scene in Europe is very

[39:07] different than in the West Coast of

[39:09] America. And that's the one I know. So,

[39:12] but in in my opinion, it has

[39:16] unfortunately

[39:18] held very tightly to a particular

[39:21] aesthetic and has not let that aesthetic

[39:24] evolve over the last 30 years. Like

[39:30] that kind of trippy acid color,

[39:32] everything feels weird kind of look.

[39:35] >> Fractal DMT entities

[39:37] >> and like the way Yes, exactly. that was

[39:40] that became sort of a thing in the '9s

[39:43] and I feel like was very drawing from

[39:46] the ' 70s heavily drawing from rock

[39:48] posters and this kind of hippie '7s

[39:51] aesthetic

[39:52] >> and then it and then and then they just

[39:55] held on to it. They just kept

[39:57] regurgitating the same thing for so long

[40:01] and then AI walked in and was like, "Oh,

[40:04] and now we'll just like turn up the

[40:05] volume on this and produce it really

[40:08] fast without evolving the aesthetic, you

[40:11] know." And so I just feel like

[40:14] until very recently anyways, the sort of

[40:16] like pop culture psychedelic aesthetic

[40:20] of marketing of um these websites,

[40:24] posters, events, all of this has been

[40:28] very unfortunate and it has expressed

[40:30] itself a lot in videos with my dad's

[40:33] voice. [laughter] And so when you look

[40:35] up Terrence McKenna, if you're if you

[40:38] don't know about him, what you encounter

[40:39] is YouTube videos of him talking with

[40:42] this kind of aesthetic, just like hodge

[40:44] podge poured over it. [snorts]

[40:47] And

[40:50] that is

[40:52] careless because it as a visual artist,

[40:56] I'm like what I'm looking at while I'm

[40:59] hearing these words really matters.

[41:01] It matters because the ideas are

[41:03] informed by it and vice versa. But it

[41:05] also matters because visual cues tell us

[41:08] whether something is for us or not,

[41:11] whether we identify with it or not.

[41:13] That's what marketing is, you know. And

[41:15] so

[41:17] if I weren't Terrence McKenna's daughter

[41:19] and someone said, "Oh, I listened to

[41:21] this amazing lecture. You should you

[41:22] should listen to it." And sent me a link

[41:23] and it was someone I trusted.

[41:26] Within 10 seconds of play pressing play,

[41:28] I would be like, "Oh, this isn't for

[41:30] me." because of the visual aesthetic,

[41:31] not because of the content of the words,

[41:34] right? I would go, "Oh, this is this I

[41:36] know who this is for and it's not me. I

[41:37] don't fit that mold, you know?" And so

[41:39] to me, that presents a barrier to entry

[41:41] to the intellectual ideas. And I see

[41:44] part of my job as stewarding his legacy

[41:47] now as,

[41:49] you know, I'm not going to undo any of

[41:51] that. Internet culture does what it

[41:52] does. I'm not trying to contain it. But

[41:54] I want to offer a counterpoint and offer

[41:57] his ideas with a different visual

[41:59] packaging that lets a different kind of

[42:02] person engage and that maybe

[42:05] acknowledges that um

[42:08] what we think looks psychedelic can mean

[42:11] many different things to different

[42:12] people and that that that singular

[42:14] aesthetic doesn't have to be it. You

[42:16] know, the flip side of that though that

[42:19] I have to mention so that it's clear I'm

[42:21] not going in this direction is that in

[42:24] this recent boom of like interest in

[42:26] psychedelics, pharmaceutical companies,

[42:28] therapies, all of this, um there's this

[42:31] other version of of the new psychedelic

[42:33] aesthetic that's like corporate

[42:35] whitewashing, you know, where you with

[42:37] these websites look like they're selling

[42:39] health insurance or something. And I

[42:41] think that's also a risk and another way

[42:44] that the underground is being visually

[42:47] erased kind of in this moment. So that's

[42:50] not a good direction either. We have to

[42:52] find another way or a multitude of ways.

[42:54] I mean that's the other thing like if

[42:56] your psychedelic experience is as

[42:58] individual as you are, then shouldn't

[43:00] there be many different aesthetics to

[43:01] represent this? you know, so I' I've

[43:04] read what you write about the Luxura um

[43:06] um archive you're working on and and it

[43:09] says there that um um as a generation

[43:12] passes the torch of psychedelics and we

[43:15] move from um the shadows into mainstream

[43:18] culture, science and medicine, the

[43:19] wisdom and stories of the counterculture

[43:21] will fade into the past. So that's what

[43:24] you try to keep alive.

[43:26] >> [snorts]

[43:26] >> um for people who maybe even didn't have

[43:29] a psychedelic experience, what would you

[43:31] say is a good entry point into the Lux

[43:34] Natura archive and what would you say if

[43:38] if one thing to our listeners is sort of

[43:41] like a key message that that's that

[43:43] speaks from the archive and I know this

[43:44] is a big question but maybe just the

[43:47] first feeling you have or the first

[43:49] thing that comes to mind. a key entry

[43:51] point to the archive is to be honest not

[43:54] yet available because we're still

[43:56] building it and so we're still in the

[43:58] stage of processing all this material.

[44:00] It's not yet being fully like shared

[44:03] with the public. Um but it will be and

[44:05] that will happen via both it will go to

[44:08] an institution where it's available for

[44:10] research but also we're making a

[44:14] whole range of um collaborations and

[44:18] publications that will pull from it. The

[44:21] first one, so this is an easy entry

[44:23] point, will be a podcast that's going to

[44:25] start um probably at the end of

[44:27] summertime. Uh that will

[44:31] use audio from

[44:34] the audio collection in the archive. So,

[44:36] some of it will be well-known talks and

[44:39] others will be material that's never

[44:41] been heard before, including lots of

[44:43] very kind of intimate recordings like

[44:46] things like um field recordings in the

[44:50] Amazon or conversations recorded in our

[44:52] living room. And then we're kind of

[44:55] activating that material, editing it in

[44:57] with more well-known material.

[44:59] >> So, that will be our first like big

[45:00] public thing. And then another thing

[45:02] that's coming that some sector of his

[45:05] fans will love is um a new album being

[45:09] released in the fall with uh Spacetime

[45:11] Continuum. He released they released

[45:13] Alien Dream Time together, you know, in

[45:15] the '90s. And this was a there was

[45:18] another concert besides Alien Dream

[45:20] Dream Time which they performed together

[45:22] on Halloween in 93 and that one was

[45:25] never released anywhere. So Jonah Sharp,

[45:28] who is the musician behind Spacetime

[45:31] Continuum, um lives in San Francisco

[45:33] also. And so we've been working together

[45:34] to release that as an album.

[45:36] >> Nice. And and when things become

[45:38] available, we will we can add them to

[45:40] the links in the description to his

[45:41] video so people can can find it.

[45:43] >> Yeah. Oh, but you asked also about like

[45:45] a message. Yeah,

[45:47] >> I I really

[45:48] >> may I share you just to see where we get

[45:50] maybe get at because thinking from our

[45:53] foundation essencia foundation is about

[45:55] idealism and non-duality and that in the

[45:58] end it's most plausible to think of the

[46:00] world as mental as as will as you just

[46:02] uh said it and in the archive in your

[46:06] presentation you have this quote from

[46:07] your father I want to say it right so

[46:09] look it up um

[46:13] um and I love this one when I stand up

[46:16] in the forest, I feel as though I'm

[46:18] standing in a library that's on fire.

[46:21] >> Yes. And I found that in his notes in a

[46:23] in a you know notepad. So I don't know

[46:26] if he ever included that in a lecture or

[46:28] not. I think it's such a beautiful idea

[46:31] because we usually think of the

[46:34] ecological and the planetary crisis we

[46:37] find ourselves in as sort of just that

[46:39] the resources and the ground of our

[46:41] existence is sort of now of course

[46:42] endangered but not of it as a world of

[46:45] ideas

[46:47] >> um um that that could help us and and

[46:49] and overlap with who we are. And just

[46:53] this notion to see a library, to see

[46:55] nature as a library, that to me is like

[46:57] astonishing and so representative of of

[46:59] your father's thinking and Yes. So I

[47:01] love that.

[47:01] >> I agree. I agree. Okay, I'll take that.

[47:04] [laughter]

[47:05] >> Okay.

[47:07] >> Thank you.

[47:08] >> Yeah, Clea, thank you so much for your

[47:10] your your wonderful um openhearted uh

[47:14] sharing of sort of who your father was

[47:17] to you, your art, and this whole

[47:19] reflection on the Lux Natura. I find it

[47:21] just a beautiful sort of play of things

[47:23] that you're working on and u thank you

[47:26] for your insightful questions too.

[47:28] >> Oh, thank you. And uh we will put uh

[47:30] links below in the description and we

[47:32] will share of course links to the Lux

[47:34] Nura archive um and when new things

[47:37] become available we'll update those

[47:39] links and a full presentation of Clea

[47:42] that she gave here at the ICPR

[47:44] conference. Thank you so much for

[47:46] watching and thanks again Clea.

[47:47] >> Thank you.

[47:53] Welcome to the talk archival revival ter

[47:56] McKenna's life and work seen through the

[47:58] Luke's Natura archive. As you may

[48:01] already know by now, you can come front

[48:03] for questions in the end of the talk.

[48:06] Now introducing the speaker, Clea

[48:08] McKenna is a visual artist and writer.

[48:10] She is a 2023 Guggenheim fellow and is

[48:13] known for cameraless photography and her

[48:15] innovative use of light sensitive

[48:17] materials. In early 2024, Clea became

[48:20] the manager of Luke Natura, a family

[48:23] partnership founded in 1977

[48:26] by her parents Kathleen Harrison and

[48:28] Terrence McKenna, which now stewards her

[48:31] father's legacy and is building an

[48:32] archive of his life and work. So, please

[48:36] give a warm welcome to Clea McKenna.

[48:41] [applause]

[48:43] >> Thank you.

[48:46] Thank you to Open Foundation for

[48:48] inviting me and also thank you to

[48:51] Nostromo Foundation who gave us a

[48:53] generous grant to launch this Lux

[48:56] Notoria archive

[48:58] and I'm Cle McKenna. Um, as she said,

[49:01] I'm primarily a visual artist. I live in

[49:04] San Francisco.

[49:06] I am also a working mom with two kids

[49:09] and I feel like a very unlikely person

[49:12] to be presenting at this conference. But

[49:14] in addition to those roles, I'm also the

[49:17] daughter of Kathleen Harrison and

[49:18] Terrence McKenna, who you may know one

[49:20] or both. Um,

[49:24] this is my artwork in the San Francisco

[49:27] Museum of Modern Art a few years ago.

[49:33] So, as you can likely imagine, Terrence

[49:37] was a complicated character to have as a

[49:40] father and cast a long shadow. And um he

[49:45] was warm and charming and charismatic

[49:49] and also mercurial and relatively

[49:53] unreliable as a parent. and um he

[49:57] delighted in,

[49:59] you know, telling us wild stories and

[50:04] fantasies and whatnot, but then he also

[50:06] would disappear into his own mind and be

[50:08] kind of completely unavailable. And I

[50:10] think if you look at the history of art

[50:12] or literature or politics, it's very

[50:14] very rare for um for someone who is a

[50:19] brilliant mind to also make a brilliant

[50:21] parent or partner. So that comes as no

[50:24] surprise. Uh let's see.

[50:27] The thing that I understand now in terms

[50:30] of my upbringing is that for people like

[50:33] my parents and also people like me, our

[50:36] inner life is often as interesting or

[50:41] more interesting than the outer world.

[50:43] And so it kind of creates this tension

[50:46] between your inner and your outer. And

[50:48] that is a conflict with the you know

[50:51] daily necessities of parenting. So I

[50:53] feel that now in my life and it gives me

[50:56] a lot of sympathy for my parents'

[50:58] shortcomings.

[51:00] Um my dad

[51:03] died when I was 19 26 years ago and when

[51:09] he did I needed to just like step away

[51:12] and do my own life and do my own you

[51:15] know find my own people my own

[51:17] community. So, I did that and I I built

[51:19] a career. I built a family. I found my

[51:22] community within the art world. And

[51:24] really only in the last two years, I've

[51:26] sort of had a big like midlife swerve

[51:29] back towards my roots.

[51:32] And so, I realized that took me a long

[51:33] time. And for those of you who have been

[51:35] waiting with baited breath for like new

[51:36] Terrence McKenna material, thank you for

[51:38] your patience. [laughter]

[51:41] Only a quarter century later. Um, so

[51:43] these are my parents, brighteyed and

[51:45] bushy tailed. And they founded Lux

[51:48] Notori in 1976. And its first role, it

[51:52] sort of has acted as just an umbrella

[51:54] for whatever it was that they wanted to

[51:56] be doing, but its first job was to sell

[52:00] psilocybin spore prints via mail order.

[52:03] So they would put these little tiny ads

[52:06] in the back of magazines and you know

[52:08] flyers at events and send out score

[52:11] prints. Over the years it did other

[52:14] things. It also became a small press and

[52:16] published some of their early book

[52:18] projects and all throughout my mom did

[52:22] all the illustrations and the art and

[52:23] the editing. So you can see here some of

[52:25] those examples.

[52:28] So back then, Luxur had many purposes

[52:31] and one of its purposes was to gather

[52:35] information about their community to try

[52:38] to kind of understand who were

[52:40] psychedelic people and help create or

[52:43] find that community.

[52:46] So this is a questionnaire that they

[52:49] sent out and gave out at events in the

[52:52] years between like I think 1982 to 85.

[52:55] They used this questionnaire. Don't

[52:57] worry, I'm going to read you some of it

[52:58] if it's too small to see. Um, this could

[53:01] be called folk research, kind of how

[53:04] communities construct meaning, gather

[53:07] data, and self-document outside of the

[53:10] official framework of, you know,

[53:11] institutions and those kinds of things.

[53:14] I think it's particularly interesting to

[53:16] consider this in this context that we're

[53:18] currently in of a conference on

[53:21] psychedelic research that is now you

[53:24] know much of it um

[53:29] government sanctioned institutionally

[53:31] funded and every one of those forces

[53:35] affects what is researched and what

[53:36] shape that research takes just like the

[53:39] absence of that structure affects that

[53:41] as well. And so what did psychedelic

[53:45] research look like in the absence of

[53:47] those kinds of structures of both

[53:49] support and regulation? And instead in

[53:52] the presence of taboo and secrecy and

[53:54] everpresent risk.

[53:57] So these are a few of the questions on

[53:59] the questionnaire. I'll read them to

[54:00] you. Describe the settings in which you

[54:03] have taken mushrooms. Were you in

[54:05] darkness alone? What are your thoughts

[54:07] on the role mushroom consciousness might

[54:09] play in the future? Have you cultivated

[54:12] magic mushrooms? Yes or no?

[54:15] Approximately how many dried grams per

[54:17] jar have you produced? Very specific.

[54:20] [laughter]

[54:21] And this is my favorite question. Do you

[54:23] own a micro computer? If you do and

[54:26] would like to be part of a mycelial

[54:28] computer network, please send a separate

[54:30] postcard marked computer with your name

[54:34] and address, type, and memory size of

[54:36] your computer. You will be contacted.

[54:41] So, I asked my mom recently what was

[54:44] their goal with this questionnaire, and

[54:46] she said, "Well, we were trying to find

[54:48] our people." And I was like, "Oh,

[54:50] right." And she said, "We were trying to

[54:51] find psychedelic people, but also people

[54:53] who were thinking about the future." And

[54:55] so, it's almost as though they were

[54:57] imagining the connectivity of the

[54:59] internet and the way it might help them

[55:01] find community before it existed. But

[55:04] what I like to imagine is a flood of

[55:08] postcards. the most analog form of

[55:10] communication there is moving through

[55:12] the United States Postal Service that

[55:14] just says computer on it and the kind of

[55:18] like mystery that might create. Um, and

[55:22] so we did receive a lot of these

[55:24] questionnaires and postcards in response

[55:26] and unfortunately they have either been

[55:28] lost to time or just I haven't found

[55:30] them yet.

[55:34] Another example of what independent

[55:36] psychedelic research looked like 50

[55:38] years ago is Terren's journal entry from

[55:41] 1977.

[55:43] And you know, at this time it basically

[55:45] looked like individuals experimenting

[55:47] often on themselves,

[55:49] recording that in one way or another,

[55:51] doing it again and again, and then

[55:53] sharing notes with friends and trying to

[55:55] understand, you know, what these

[55:57] phenomena mean. Um, I'm going to play a

[56:02] recording that is basically of Terrence.

[56:05] He made this recording. He was by

[56:07] himself in Hawaii. He was camping on our

[56:09] land there before we built a house. And

[56:12] he was taking mushrooms and

[56:14] experimenting with glossalia.

[56:17] And he

[56:19] had this experience recorded during it

[56:21] and then the next day wrote about it in

[56:23] his journal. So this this journal

[56:25] transcription refers to the the recorded

[56:28] evening and I'll just play a moment of

[56:30] it. Don't get too excited.

[56:35] >> We're talking to McKenna.

[56:39] >> I am taking 7 g of stfaria.

[56:47] I have decided to do seven grams because

[56:51] five grams was apparently insufficient

[56:55] two days ago.

[56:57] And uh if there's anything like

[57:01] tolerance, it would seem that a higher

[57:04] dose is indicated. And also uh perhaps

[57:09] five grams of this strain is uh simply

[57:12] not sufficient for what I'm trying to

[57:14] do.

[57:26] I'm what?

[57:31] This is chibberish.

[57:34] SL

[57:38] [laughter]

[57:57] [laughter]

[57:59] didn't

[58:01] delh

[58:04] My how dead

[58:06] flow didn't hurt me.

[58:09] >> Okay, that's enough of that. [laughter]

[58:12] Okay,

[58:18] so Lux Notori has evolved over the years

[58:21] and sort of went dormant for some

[58:23] decades. And when I took it over a year

[58:25] and a half ago,

[58:29] we took it on with this role of being

[58:32] the stewards of Terren's legacy of his

[58:34] original work, his intellectual

[58:36] property, and also building this

[58:38] archive. And that's really like the

[58:40] heart of it.

[58:42] So when I began this work, there really

[58:44] was no archive. It wasn't that it

[58:46] existed and I, you know, took it on. It

[58:48] didn't really exist. But there were

[58:50] multiple generations of people who never

[58:53] get rid of things. And so I began by

[58:55] going to family storage units and in

[58:58] both California and Hawaii, reaching out

[59:00] to close friends, to family members, to

[59:03] colleagues he collaborated with, to

[59:05] institutions that he taught at and

[59:07] seeing what they have and then compiling

[59:10] it. Um,

[59:13] Eselin Institute contributed 50 hours of

[59:16] video footage from the 80s. Librarian

[59:18] Chris Maize contributed his collection

[59:20] of periodicals featuring Terrence. And

[59:23] my mom had saved all the illustrations

[59:25] and mock-ups and ephemera from their

[59:27] projects together during their 17-year

[59:29] marriage. And then I had inherited all

[59:32] of his journals and papers and

[59:34] correspondents.

[59:37] So what does this archive contain and

[59:39] what does this process look like? Here's

[59:42] a very kind of broad strokes version of

[59:45] the categories that are in the archive

[59:47] and the types of material that we're

[59:48] processing. Within each category, we

[59:52] gather as much as we can. We inventory

[59:55] it. We give each item numbers and do all

[59:58] these a lot of spreadsheets. And then we

[1:00:01] identify the gaps in that inventory and

[1:00:03] go out and try to find those things when

[1:00:06] possible. And then we scan and digitize.

[1:00:10] And along the way, we're publicizing

[1:00:12] this project through things like doing

[1:00:14] talks and social media. And the reason

[1:00:17] for that is that it seems to elicit new

[1:00:21] material. So people hear about it and

[1:00:23] then reach out and say, "Oh, I have this

[1:00:25] thing from 82." And, you know,

[1:00:26] contribute it. And so it makes the

[1:00:29] archive both more complete and more

[1:00:31] collective.

[1:00:34] This is my studio in San Francisco,

[1:00:36] which has become archiving headquarters.

[1:00:38] Um,

[1:00:41] the team on this is basically me and

[1:00:44] Kelly Eisworth with the black hair here.

[1:00:47] And then we have a whole slew of

[1:00:49] volunteers who come to do specific jobs

[1:00:52] like digitization

[1:00:54] and adding metadata and sorting things

[1:00:57] by date. We also, this is my mom,

[1:01:00] Kathleen on the right, on the left,

[1:01:02] right, whatever. Um, who uh swoops in

[1:01:06] every once in a while to answer

[1:01:08] questions like weird audio tapes that

[1:01:10] have no labels? Can you identify them?

[1:01:12] Things, mysteries. Um,

[1:01:17] yeah. And the way that I'm I'm operating

[1:01:20] this project, the process I'm using, and

[1:01:22] particularly the way I'm working with

[1:01:24] others and volunteers is really guided

[1:01:27] by advice I've gotten from other

[1:01:30] parallel projects. Both the Ann and

[1:01:32] Sasha Schulan archive and the Alan Watts

[1:01:35] Foundation have been advising me on kind

[1:01:38] of how to engage people, how to work

[1:01:40] with them in a way that is both useful

[1:01:42] and efficient for the archive as well as

[1:01:45] like engaging and enriching for the

[1:01:47] community. So I'm grateful to their

[1:01:49] advice.

[1:01:51] We also work with a crew of remote

[1:01:54] volunteers who are all over the US and

[1:01:57] they transcribe his handwritten material

[1:02:00] via an online platform.

[1:02:03] So this is again a page from his

[1:02:05] journal. You can see his handwriting can

[1:02:07] be challenging especially for younger

[1:02:09] people who are not comfortable with

[1:02:11] cursive. Um and you might ask why aren't

[1:02:15] we using AI to do this? And the reason

[1:02:17] why is that we like working with humans

[1:02:20] and we find that they um contribute

[1:02:24] something beyond actually the

[1:02:25] translation. They contribute their

[1:02:27] insights, their experiences. They

[1:02:29] actually end up getting involved in

[1:02:32] unexpected ways. And so it's another way

[1:02:34] to make this a connective process.

[1:02:38] Okay. So this collection is both

[1:02:40] physical and digital. And the long-term

[1:02:42] goal is to find it a home in an

[1:02:45] institutional archive where it will be

[1:02:47] professionally preserved

[1:02:50] and become part of a kind of more

[1:02:52] permanent or you know whatever is

[1:02:54] permanent um historical record and be

[1:02:57] available to the public for

[1:02:59] interpretation for research for

[1:03:01] collaboration.

[1:03:03] So why that why rely on an institution?

[1:03:06] Um, I come from the art world and it has

[1:03:10] been my experience that art history is

[1:03:13] written through museum permanent

[1:03:15] collections. If you get your work into a

[1:03:17] museum permanent collection, no one can

[1:03:19] undo that. You are now part of the story

[1:03:21] of art history. And I think that in

[1:03:23] parallel archives operate that way for

[1:03:26] you know a more broader definition of

[1:03:28] history. And you know 100 years from

[1:03:30] now, 400 years from now, the history

[1:03:33] that will be told will be the one that

[1:03:36] is I mean is evidenced in

[1:03:40] archives that have survived have

[1:03:42] survived climate change, rising sea

[1:03:44] levels, political upheaval, and you know

[1:03:46] short-sighted personal decisions. So

[1:03:49] that's my goal also because I would like

[1:03:51] to pass this on and go back to making

[1:03:53] art. [laughter]

[1:03:56] So,

[1:03:57] so as I meet with curators and

[1:03:59] archivists at major institutions in the

[1:04:01] US, which I've done a lot of over the

[1:04:03] last year, um

[1:04:06] I'm hearing from them that we're in this

[1:04:09] unique moment where,

[1:04:13] you know, institutions are are funded by

[1:04:17] governments and corporations. And so

[1:04:19] therefore, what they collect tells the

[1:04:21] story that those entities want told. And

[1:04:24] because of that, because of the taboo

[1:04:26] nature of psychedelics, there is a very

[1:04:28] large gap in the archival record and it

[1:04:30] is the shape of 20th century psychedelic

[1:04:34] underground. Basically, that just hasn't

[1:04:36] been collected. And now, as there's this

[1:04:40] whole thing happening with psychedelics

[1:04:42] and they're sort of coming into the

[1:04:43] mainstream, it is retroactively

[1:04:45] legitimizing that history. So what once

[1:04:48] may have seemed sort of like fringy and

[1:04:50] crazy now seems like the history of a

[1:04:52] legitimate mainstream cultural phenomena

[1:04:55] and therefore they're willing to collect

[1:04:56] it. So that shift

[1:04:59] coincidentally maybe is happening at the

[1:05:03] same time as a generational changing of

[1:05:06] the guard from the baby boomers to you

[1:05:08] know all the rest of us. And

[1:05:12] you know my dad died very young. He died

[1:05:15] when he was 53, but his peers are 80

[1:05:18] now. He would be 80 if he were alive.

[1:05:20] And so they're dying off very quickly.

[1:05:22] And I'm seeing that in real time. I'm

[1:05:24] sure you all are, too. So I really feel

[1:05:27] like this presents an opportunity

[1:05:30] to both gather knowledge and try to

[1:05:35] facilitate a kind of um

[1:05:38] intergenerational transfer of knowledge

[1:05:40] and also get those stories into the

[1:05:42] permanent record.

[1:05:44] So that's kind of the big picture goal

[1:05:48] here.

[1:05:55] Thank you. [laughter] Sorry, I just need

[1:05:57] to make sure I didn't like skip

[1:05:58] something entirely. Okay.

[1:06:01] Okay. So now, wait, did it switch? Yes.

[1:06:05] Okay. So now I'm going to show you some

[1:06:07] highlights from the archive. This is one

[1:06:10] of my personal favorites that many of

[1:06:12] you have probably seen. These are the

[1:06:14] photographs of Sarah Hartley.

[1:06:16] Sarah was a friend of Terren's from UC

[1:06:18] Berkeley and in late 1970 when he and

[1:06:21] his crew were planning their you know

[1:06:24] adventure to the Amazon, Sarah sort of

[1:06:26] jumped on board and selfassigned

[1:06:30] the role of expedition photographer and

[1:06:33] she had some experience as a

[1:06:34] photographer on um archaeological digs.

[1:06:37] So she brought that, she went with them.

[1:06:41] She brought a twin lens, medium format

[1:06:45] camera and a 35mm SLR. And the result of

[1:06:49] that is that for the last, you know,

[1:06:52] 40ome, 50, whatever it was, years, we've

[1:06:55] had this series of about 10 really

[1:06:57] beautiful black and white prints. This

[1:06:59] being sort of the the hero of them, um,

[1:07:03] that she shot

[1:07:07] And I I'm giving you a closeup because I

[1:07:10] think this photo is kind of

[1:07:11] extraordinary with the level of

[1:07:13] botanical texture and detail in it. And

[1:07:16] at this time, you know, Terrence

[1:07:18] operated as a butterfly hunter from the

[1:07:21] years 1968 to 1972. this was a way of

[1:07:25] making a living but also um but also

[1:07:29] kind of a cover like a way of explaining

[1:07:32] what the hell he was doing in these

[1:07:34] places being himself, you know. So, it

[1:07:36] was his story. It sort of legitimized

[1:07:38] him, but it was also his living and it

[1:07:41] was also a way to cosplay being a

[1:07:44] Victorian explorer which he had been

[1:07:46] obsessed with since he was like a little

[1:07:48] kid.

[1:07:51] This is another one. This is the whole

[1:07:53] crew in Lerera. Terrence and Dennis are

[1:07:55] in the middle and the fellow at the far

[1:07:57] end has a little monkey in his lap and

[1:08:01] Sarah had the forethought here to set up

[1:08:04] the tripod and then go and get in the

[1:08:06] picture. So that's her on the left. So

[1:08:08] this is the whole band al together.

[1:08:13] These are more of them. I'm really

[1:08:15] eternally grateful to her for um for

[1:08:19] going on that journey and

[1:08:22] being such a good photographer

[1:08:24] [laughter] because this has been the

[1:08:26] only visual evidence we've had of the

[1:08:28] this moment in his life that became so

[1:08:30] pivotal to both his personal life and

[1:08:33] his philosophy.

[1:08:36] She was also kind of the voice of

[1:08:39] reason. And if you've read True

[1:08:40] Hallucinations, her character was named

[1:08:42] Vanessa, so you'll know what I mean. And

[1:08:44] again, like they may not have made it

[1:08:46] out of there alive had she not been with

[1:08:48] them because she really was the most she

[1:08:50] had her head screwed on. Um, okay. So,

[1:08:53] what we have found in doing the

[1:08:54] archiving that we didn't have before is

[1:08:56] we found contact sheets and we haven't

[1:08:58] found the negatives, but we found

[1:09:01] contact sheets and they provide

[1:09:03] narrative and context. This is a sheet

[1:09:06] from in the weeks before they went to

[1:09:08] Loera preparing for the expedition and

[1:09:10] passing through Periera Colombia.

[1:09:13] This is on the Rio Pamo.

[1:09:18] And in some cases, if the quality was

[1:09:20] good enough, we've been able to zoom in

[1:09:22] on the little contact sheets and, you

[1:09:24] know, do these high-res scans so that we

[1:09:26] can see images that were never printed

[1:09:28] and kind of um restore those. So, this

[1:09:32] is one as well from that.

[1:09:35] And if you'll notice on the lower right,

[1:09:37] there's this half of this boy's face,

[1:09:40] which I just love. And to me, this sort

[1:09:42] of sings of magical realism.

[1:09:46] So last month, I spent a day with Sarah.

[1:09:49] She is still alive. And um I spent a day

[1:09:51] at her house interviewing her, recording

[1:09:54] her stories, and going through these

[1:09:56] materials. And this is really one of the

[1:09:58] best parts of this whole job is getting

[1:10:00] to go beyond the actual material in the

[1:10:02] archive and find, you know, the

[1:10:05] characters and the stories connected to

[1:10:07] it and the parts that um like little

[1:10:10] putting pieces back into a puzzle.

[1:10:14] Okay. Another place where I've been able

[1:10:16] to do that kind of outreach and find

[1:10:18] material to add is in the

[1:10:21] correspondence. So we have hundreds

[1:10:22] maybe thousands of letters and

[1:10:26] the thing about letters is that you only

[1:10:28] have half the conversation generally

[1:10:30] right and it's the half not written by

[1:10:32] the person you're studying. So

[1:10:36] when we have a lot of letters from

[1:10:38] someone we try to find them or their

[1:10:41] heirs and see if by any chance some of

[1:10:43] Terren's letters to them survived. So

[1:10:46] one place where that was successful was

[1:10:48] Luis Eduardo Luna who many of you

[1:10:50] probably know. He's a renowned Iawaska

[1:10:52] researcher and ethnobbotonist. We have

[1:10:55] about 112 letters between the two of

[1:10:58] them back and forth and we've been able

[1:11:00] to sequence those and kind of see this

[1:11:02] arc of their relationship. They met in

[1:11:05] Colombia in 1972 and um

[1:11:10] and their their relationship affected

[1:11:12] both of their trajectories and Eduardo

[1:11:15] says that still.

[1:11:17] So

[1:11:19] this is a letter from 1973

[1:11:22] and you can kind of see the uh the way

[1:11:25] that they share ideas and also a sense

[1:11:27] of kind of a brotherly bond.

[1:11:31] Believe me, I s this is from Terrence to

[1:11:33] Eduardo. Believe me, I sympathize with

[1:11:35] your hunger for knowledge and I too look

[1:11:37] back at the life we knew at Villa

[1:11:39] Gloria. But don't worry, old friend.

[1:11:42] Reading all the mystics was very good

[1:11:43] for me because they insisted that there

[1:11:45] was a transcendent reality capable of

[1:11:47] being encountered. For years, they and

[1:11:49] their metaphors were the compass of our

[1:11:51] quest. When, however, we finally did

[1:11:53] encounter the mystery, we found that it

[1:11:55] was science that was most useful in

[1:11:57] allowing us to assimilate the contents

[1:11:59] of the mystery. My reading over the past

[1:12:01] couple years has centered on the worth

[1:12:03] of science. And I have wandered somewhat

[1:12:05] from the consensus of the pop mystics

[1:12:07] because I guess that we discovered that

[1:12:09] we ourselves, if we truly wish the world

[1:12:11] to take us seriously, we must give our

[1:12:13] theory the intellectual rigor that is

[1:12:16] only associated with the scientific

[1:12:17] theory.

[1:12:19] I'm not sure they totally achieved that,

[1:12:20] but they [laughter] tried.

[1:12:22] Okay. So, in the interest of time,

[1:12:24] unfortunately, I'm going to skip over

[1:12:26] this section, but these are letters from

[1:12:28] Terrence between Terrence and his

[1:12:29] mother. Um, which was a really beautiful

[1:12:32] and surprising relationship. Uh, I'll

[1:12:34] just the shortest version is just that,

[1:12:37] [sighs]

[1:12:38] [gasps] you know, she was a housewife in

[1:12:40] Colorado, a smart and educated one, but,

[1:12:43] you know, small town, and he was in

[1:12:45] Berkeley experimenting and doing all

[1:12:48] kinds of crazy things. and they he hid

[1:12:51] nothing from her. He was very open and

[1:12:54] candid. She really made a a true effort

[1:12:57] to sort of open her mind to his ideas

[1:12:59] and keep up and um and it's just

[1:13:02] beautiful to see. And then also these

[1:13:05] are postcards he sent her during the two

[1:13:08] years when

[1:13:10] he was ex exiled. He always called it uh

[1:13:13] he there was a there was a hash bust and

[1:13:15] he then there was a warrant out for a

[1:13:17] hash smuggling bust. there was a warrant

[1:13:18] out for his arrest and he couldn't

[1:13:19] re-enter the US and during those two

[1:13:22] years while he was living abroad she got

[1:13:24] breast cancer and died and he didn't

[1:13:27] make it back in time to say goodbye to

[1:13:29] her and this was a kind of wound that he

[1:13:31] carried his whole life it was a very a

[1:13:33] heartbreak for him um but you can see

[1:13:36] this is a transcription of the last of

[1:13:38] this series of postcards

[1:13:41] and you can see that he I'll let you

[1:13:43] guys read it to yourselves but you can

[1:13:44] see that he is

[1:13:47] trying to find connection between his

[1:13:49] kind of burgeoning worldview and her,

[1:13:52] you know, Irish Catholic

[1:13:56] perspective on dying.

[1:14:06] Okay.

[1:14:07] So, one of the things that is often said

[1:14:09] of Terrence is that he is hard to

[1:14:11] categorize,

[1:14:13] right? Is he a philosopher, a scholar,

[1:14:15] an ethnobbotonist, an entertainer? The

[1:14:18] term I've settled on out of convenience

[1:14:21] sort of is psychedelic philosopher, but

[1:14:23] it's not really comprehensive. I see him

[1:14:26] as a brilliant and deeply flawed man who

[1:14:30] was sort of just freef falling through

[1:14:32] life like the rest of us. and he

[1:14:36] definitely had, you know, was born with

[1:14:39] a gift for language and for creative

[1:14:41] thought and and connecting disparit

[1:14:44] ideas. And who knows where that came

[1:14:46] from. Um, but with decades of distance

[1:14:51] now re-encountering his work, I now view

[1:14:54] his work as art. And for me, that opens

[1:14:57] up

[1:14:59] the most room to appreciate it. Um, you

[1:15:03] know, I I understand it to be philosophy

[1:15:05] and literature and performance all sort

[1:15:09] of packaged into a persona that was

[1:15:11] itself a work of art. And um, like him,

[1:15:15] I've always been fairly unconcerned

[1:15:16] about truth or fact in art. He always

[1:15:19] said, you know, don't let the truth get

[1:15:21] in the way of a good story. Um,

[1:15:24] and you know when I encounter a work of

[1:15:26] art like a painting let's say I don't

[1:15:28] ask myself I don't judge it based on the

[1:15:30] criteria of like is it true is it

[1:15:33] factual or even like is it good advice I

[1:15:36] judge it on the metric of does it move

[1:15:38] me does it stretch my heart or mind and

[1:15:41] I feel like his work does and so that is

[1:15:44] my relationship to it now and I think

[1:15:47] that you know it is definitely not

[1:15:50] gospel it is not life instructions to be

[1:15:53] followed. What it is is art to be felt

[1:15:56] and considered and mold over and

[1:15:58] hopefully to incite wonder. And I think

[1:16:01] he would even back me up on that now.

[1:16:06] Okay. So, with that in mind, the next

[1:16:07] category I want to share with you is his

[1:16:09] lecture notes. Um, these are from the

[1:16:11] 80s and 90s. And I remember that during

[1:16:14] those years, he always had these yellow

[1:16:16] legal pads just like all over our house,

[1:16:18] everywhere. This one on the left is

[1:16:21] about the dangers of viral ideology

[1:16:25] and in the middle somewhere in there it

[1:16:27] says how to become resistant

[1:16:29] intellectual history rules of evidence

[1:16:31] mathematics aesthetics/good

[1:16:34] taste and psychedelics and then it ends

[1:16:37] with fullbrain condom

[1:16:41] [sighs]

[1:16:42] and this one says sweating the word out

[1:16:45] of the gross materia of the animal mind.

[1:16:49] So, you can see that some of these are

[1:16:51] actually lecture notes in the sense that

[1:16:52] they're like an outline with phrases

[1:16:55] that would trigger a whole rant and

[1:16:58] others are

[1:17:00] where he's sort of working through like

[1:17:03] word combinations and ways to express an

[1:17:05] idea and you can almost see the process

[1:17:07] a little more. And then some are just

[1:17:09] pros that may or may not have like

[1:17:11] become part of something later.

[1:17:15] So this one on the left is from a talk

[1:17:17] at Chapman College and it says,

[1:17:19] "Confidence is growing. Reality isn't

[1:17:22] what it used to be. Boundary dissolution

[1:17:24] is proceeding. Distancing ourselves from

[1:17:26] nature has failed."

[1:17:29] And then the other one I love says, "The

[1:17:32] old kingdom, its glory scattered, its

[1:17:35] great tombs unattended, lies 150 years

[1:17:38] in the past. The new kingdom has yet to

[1:17:41] rise 200 years in the future. It is 2300

[1:17:44] BC. It is the pivot. When I stand in a

[1:17:47] tropical rainforest, I feel as though I

[1:17:50] am standing in a library that is on

[1:17:51] fire.

[1:17:54] So, as I go through these lecture notes,

[1:17:57] I pull out little phrases that feel

[1:18:00] extra potent. And so, these are just

[1:18:02] some excerpts from the six pages I just

[1:18:04] showed you.

[1:18:09] Okay, I want to return to our current

[1:18:11] context.

[1:18:13] a conference on psychedelic science. And

[1:18:16] notice that in the shadow of all this

[1:18:19] progress that's been made, all this

[1:18:21] scientific research and policy and

[1:18:23] legislation and the arrival of the

[1:18:26] psychedelics into the mainstream that

[1:18:29] the psychedelic underground is sort of

[1:18:32] just quietly disappearing. And as I

[1:18:35] mentioned before, I see this as a window

[1:18:39] of opportunity

[1:18:41] both to do the folk research of

[1:18:44] gathering those stories and to get them

[1:18:48] into the actual historical record now

[1:18:51] that the forces that be will suddenly

[1:18:54] embrace that.

[1:18:56] And you know, obviously the deepest and

[1:18:58] truest roots of psychedelics belong to

[1:19:01] the indigenous cultures that have held

[1:19:03] those plants and practices for millennia

[1:19:06] and that should be

[1:19:09] recorded and respected as such. And so

[1:19:13] what then does the underground mean and

[1:19:16] what is its value if it's not that?

[1:19:19] Right? The way I see it is it's the sort

[1:19:21] of bridge in between. It's the

[1:19:25] it's a layer of culture that exists

[1:19:28] beneath mainstream culture and that

[1:19:31] anything that is taboo has to pass

[1:19:34] through that under underground to come

[1:19:37] to the surface of a culture. It's sort

[1:19:39] of like the bardau of a society.

[1:19:42] And I think that

[1:19:44] living in the underground carries real

[1:19:47] risk and stigma and is in and of itself

[1:19:50] a form of resistance. And that's the

[1:19:52] world I grew up in and spent the first

[1:19:54] 20 years of my life. Um,

[1:19:59] and so I think now

[1:20:02] one of the things that we can do,

[1:20:05] and I do want to say that this hits

[1:20:07] differently in different cultures. So

[1:20:09] the the depth of the underground perhaps

[1:20:12] was different in America than in Europe

[1:20:14] because the intensity of persecution was

[1:20:17] different. you know, the Reagan's war on

[1:20:19] drugs was a was a unique situation to

[1:20:21] some degree, but um

[1:20:24] yes, but that's my perspective, the

[1:20:25] American perspective.

[1:20:27] So,

[1:20:29] I think that now is a time to to gather

[1:20:33] this information and to share it. And

[1:20:38] there seems to be in the San Francisco

[1:20:40] Bay area a sort of wave of interest in

[1:20:42] archiving the psychedelic underground.

[1:20:44] There are several efforts, some I

[1:20:46] mentioned before, like the Scholan

[1:20:47] archive. Also at UC Santa Cruz, there's

[1:20:50] now the um the Grateful Dead archive,

[1:20:53] which is massive and sprawling in its

[1:20:55] scope. Um the archive of psychedelic

[1:20:58] history, which is a digital only archive

[1:21:00] at UC Santa Cruz. And so there is this

[1:21:03] interest and myself along with these

[1:21:06] other groups have been discussing some

[1:21:08] kind of collective way to encourage the

[1:21:11] public to do this kind of folk research.

[1:21:13] you know, to to if you know a

[1:21:16] psychedelic elder to sit down with them

[1:21:18] in a quiet room with your iPhone

[1:21:20] recorder and to ask them what it means

[1:21:23] to live a psychedelic life, what it

[1:21:26] means to live in the underground, how it

[1:21:28] shaped them, how they shaped it, and

[1:21:30] what advice they might have for us.

[1:21:39] I've jumped ahead. So, this is an image

[1:21:41] taken from uh the

[1:21:45] the making of the magic the psilocybin

[1:21:47] magic mushroom growers guide. These are

[1:21:49] like how-to photos and notes written in

[1:21:51] my mom's handwriting. This was a book

[1:21:53] that my uncle Dennis and Terrence and my

[1:21:56] mom published together both in 1976 and

[1:21:59] then reissued in 1986. And this was

[1:22:02] published under fake names, but you may

[1:22:04] know the book.

[1:22:07] Okay, here's another example of how folk

[1:22:09] research shows up in the archive. This

[1:22:12] is a collection of questions from the

[1:22:15] audience at Terren's talks from the

[1:22:17] years between 1986 and 1989. So when

[1:22:21] people would arrive, they would pass out

[1:22:23] these pieces of paper and then you could

[1:22:25] ask a question and pass it up to the

[1:22:26] front. And we have a few hundred of

[1:22:28] these and it's an interesting snapshot

[1:22:29] of that era and what people were asking.

[1:22:33] Um, I'll read you a few of them.

[1:22:38] People who have a near-death experience

[1:22:40] and come back seem to share common

[1:22:41] experiences. Do people using these drugs

[1:22:44] share common experiences? And the

[1:22:46] everpresent question, how does one

[1:22:48] acquire DMT? That one gets asked a lot.

[1:22:51] Um, in order to create a psychedelic

[1:22:54] society, it seems like we need to reach

[1:22:56] out to the public at large and get a

[1:22:57] significant percentage of it to have

[1:22:59] psychedelic experiences. How do we

[1:23:01] accomplish that? And then uh could you

[1:23:04] ask the mushroom what we do about George

[1:23:06] Bush? Or have you already?

[1:23:10] So in the 40 years since these questions

[1:23:13] were written, which ones have we

[1:23:14] answered, which ones have become

[1:23:16] obsolete, and which ones are still

[1:23:18] unknown to us?

[1:23:22] And uh lastly, I want to share with you

[1:23:25] what my dad told me about death.

[1:23:28] In the last week of his life, when he

[1:23:30] was already in this kind of liinal state

[1:23:33] between the veils, he said that

[1:23:38] at the moment that we die, our genetic

[1:23:41] material splits and travels both forward

[1:23:44] and backward in time, and we become

[1:23:46] simultaneously our ancestors and our

[1:23:49] descendants.

[1:23:52] And in the 25 years since then, I have

[1:23:54] yet to encounter a better definition of

[1:23:56] death. So, I've held on to that one. And

[1:23:58] I made this photo kind of in response to

[1:24:01] that. This is a picture of Terrence's

[1:24:03] Sicilian grandmother, Teresa, his

[1:24:06] mother, Hazel, Terrence, and of course,

[1:24:09] me as the photographer or the witness,

[1:24:12] and then my six-year-old son's hand

[1:24:14] there.

[1:24:17] And that's it. Thank you. [applause]

[1:24:24] Oh.

EF
Artist
Essentia Foundation

Watch more from Essentia Foundation on YouTube.

Sito web
Esplora i temi
Klea-mckennaTerence-mckennaLux-natura-archivePsychedelic-legacyAnimism

Hai domande?

Domande frequenti

Klea McKenna is a visual artist and writer, daughter of psychedelic philosopher Terence McKenna and ethnobotanist Kathleen Harrison. She is known for her camera-less photography and is now archiving her parents' work through the Lux Natura Archive.
The Lux Natura Archive is the project through which Klea McKenna is preserving the work of her parents, Terence McKenna and Kathleen Harrison. It is tied to the official Terence McKenna website, where the archival talks are gathered, and it supports a planned podcast built from those recordings.
According to his daughter Klea McKenna, he often used 'culture' when he meant 'society,' and his real target was American mainstream culture. She reads the line as a call to question the culture handed to you by default and to invent your own within your communities, rather than a rejection of culture itself.
Yes, Klea McKenna says that during a period in Hawaii the family lived off the grid, with no electricity, no telephones and no other conveniences. She describes that time as a magical period of her early childhood, before the family moved back to California.
She says chasing butterflies is a metaphor for his life because you chase something alive, but to study it closely you have to capture and kill it. The same tension, she suggests, applies to holding psychedelic insights in words and everyday life.
She says her childhood, with its travel across Central and South America and its exposure to indigenous worldviews, shaped her artwork and her awareness of nature. She describes an uncommon relationship to the natural world that she only recognized as unusual after comparing her life to others.

Continua a leggere

More on Inspiration

Vedi Tutto
Why Feeling Lazy After Awakening Is Normal: Being vs. Doing
Inspire

Why Feeling Lazy After Awakening Is Normal: Being vs. Doing

Feeling deeply connected yet strangely lazy after a spiritual awakening is more common than it seems. Eckhart Tolle explains why it happens …

9 min read
Mantra Medicine for Letting Go: Listening to "I Release"
Inspire

Mantra Medicine for Letting Go: Listening to "I Release"

A close listen to Beautiful Chorus's "Mantra Medicine: Release," a seven-minute sung affirmation built on "I release" and what repeating a s…

4 min read
Why Spiritual Seeking Can Keep You From Finding It
Inspire

Why Spiritual Seeking Can Keep You From Finding It

Eckhart Tolle argues that the spiritual search can hide the deep I, which is already present in the now. He reads the Buddha's tree, the 6:3…

9 min read
Loving-Kindness Metta: How the Phrases Widen the Heart
Inspire

Loving-Kindness Metta: How the Phrases Widen the Heart

Brenda McMorrow's eight-minute guided metta meditation moves from self to all beings through three short phrases. Here is how the sequence w…

8 min read

Continua a esplorare

Continua il tuo viaggio

Altra saggezza e altri incontri da tutta la directory BrightStar.

Altri articoli

Sfoglia l’intera raccolta di insegnamenti, interviste e guide.

Torna a tutti gli articoli →

Insegnanti e artisti

Esplora i lignaggi, i musicisti e le guide del mondo consapevole.

Esplora gli artisti →

Trova un evento

Kirtan, ritiri, sound bath, breathwork, festival: in arrivo presto.

Sfoglia gli eventi →